Wilson iron
The Wilson Staff Ci6 Iron Set is an iron in 11 options from 20°–60°.
Built against the iron fieldpublished figures only
Image not published
Where this club lands
The field is every iron in the database that publishes both of the chart's figures — every brand, not just Wilson.
This set's 7-iron is 32° — 60th percentile, weaker-lofted than 60% of the 889 sets that publish one. The median is 32°.
Loft ladder against the field
Loft at each club in the set over the middle half (p25–p75) of every comparable iron set on record — the busiest rung here is built from 900.
Wilson Staff Ci6 Iron Setmiddle half of the field
A break in the line is a club the set does not publish a loft for — it is never bridged, because joining across a gap would draw a loft the manufacturer never stated. Every brand's name for the gap wedge is pooled into one rung, since only 25 of 917 sets publish two of them.
The head half
Wilson Staff Ci6 Iron Set · 7
- LOFT · X AXIS32°
- 60th percentile — weaker-lofted than 60% of the 889 sets that publish a 7-iron
- LIE · Y AXIS62°
- 44th percentile — flatter than 56% of the 889 sets that publish a 7-iron
7-iron field: Loft × Lie
The 7-iron of every comparable iron set on record publishing both loft and lie — 889 of them, binned by density.
Specifications by option
What this record publishes. Across 11 options: loft, lie and length on every one.
11 rows, unsorted, collapsed — use the button below the table to show every option.
| 20 | 3 | 59.5 | 39.5 |
| 23 | 4 | 60 | 39 |
| 26 | 5 | 61 | 38.5 |
| 29 | 6 | 61.5 | 38 |
| 32 | 7 | 62 | 37.5 |
| 36 | 8 | 63 | 37 |
| 40 | 9 | 63.5 | 36.5 |
| 44 | PW | 64 | 36 |
| 50 | GW | 64 | 36 |
| 55 | SW | 64 | 36 |
| 60 | LW | 64 | 36 |
Head geometry doesn't change with the shaft, so it's stated once. A blank cell means Wilson did not publish that figure — we don't estimate.
Measured against comparable clubs
Where this club's published fitting specs sit among comparable clubs — never how good it is.
| Figure | Published | All irons | Its year | Among its peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strongest-lofted 7-iron | 32° | =438th of 953 | no release year on record | =20th of 39 Wilson irons · =48th of 508 low-handicap irons |
| Widest loft range | 40° | =96th of 1,104 | no release year on record | =1st of 42 Wilson irons · =42nd of 508 low-handicap irons |
| Most upright lie | 62° | =539th of 941 | no release year on record | =2nd of 38 Wilson irons · =264th of 505 low-handicap irons |
| Longest | 37.5" | =8th of 894 | no release year on record | =1st of 38 Wilson irons · =1st of 466 low-handicap irons |
player level — derived
This iron reads as built for a low-handicap player — our deterministic reading of 7-iron loft 32° (no offset published). A design classification, not a rule about who may play it. How the bands are read →
Or go straight to a comparison: vs PXG 0211 XCOR2 Irons | Players Distance Irons · vs XXIO 13 Ladies Irons · vs Titleist 1979-80 Tour Model
More irons
Wilson Ci11 IRONS 1 option Wilson Ci9 IRONS 1 option Wilson D9 Forged Irons discontinued 2021 · 19°–49° · 9 options · 3 stock shafts Wilson D9 Irons discontinued 2021 · 18°–53° · 16 options · 1 stock shaft Wilson Di11 IRONS 1 option Wilson Dynapower Forged Irons discontinued 2024 · 21.5°–49° · 8 options · 2 stock shafts Wilson Dynapower Irons discontinued 2023 · 21°–42° · 7 options Wilson DYNAPWR Forged Steel Irons 2026 · 19°–49° · 9 options · 1 stock shaft
Other Wilson irons on record. Nothing here is a ranking or a recommendation. Browse every club →
What's on this page
In progress2 of 3 built
2 of 3 parts of this club page are built, and we're filling in the rest.
- Wilson's own specs, not built yet.We haven't found Wilson's own page for this club yet — everything here comes from the sources listed at the foot of the page.
- Published options, built.11 configurations with 3 of the 7 specs an iron can publish.
- Stock shaft, built.Wilson names no stock shaft for this club on the sources we hold, so there's nothing to link.
The site is in beta and the database is still being built, so expect gaps. Know something we don't? Help us fill it in — a link to where it's published is worth more than anything else you could send.