Skip to content
Zomma Golf
Menu

Wilson iron

The Wilson FG Tour F5 Irons is an iron in 9 options from 21°–51°, RH and LH.

9
options
21–51
loft °
Built against the iron fieldpublished figures only
DIFFERENCE FROM THE MEDIAN OF EVERY RECORD WE HOLDLOFTMEDIAN 33.0°35.0° +2LIEMEDIAN 62.5°62.0° -0.5LENGTHMEDIAN 37.00"37.25" +0.25
Each bar is this club's published figure minus the median of the 1,118 other irons on record that publish it — a median over the records we hold.

View on Wilson →

Where this club lands

The field is every iron in the database that publishes both of the chart's figures — every brand, not just Wilson.

This set's 7-iron is 35° — 95th percentile, weaker-lofted than 95% of the 889 sets that publish one. The median is 32°.

Loft ladder against the field

Loft at each club in the set over the middle half (p25–p75) of every comparable iron set on record — the busiest rung here is built from 900.

Wilson FG Tour F5 Ironsmiddle half of the field
2030405060123456789PWGW/AWSWLWLOFT (°)Wilson FG Tour F5 Irons — 3: 21°Wilson FG Tour F5 Irons — 4: 24°Wilson FG Tour F5 Irons — 5: 27°Wilson FG Tour F5 Irons — 6: 31°Wilson FG Tour F5 Irons — 7: 35°Wilson FG Tour F5 Irons — 8: 39°Wilson FG Tour F5 Irons — 9: 43°Wilson FG Tour F5 Irons — PW: 47°Wilson FG Tour F5 Irons — GW: 51°

A break in the line is a club the set does not publish a loft for — it is never bridged, because joining across a gap would draw a loft the manufacturer never stated. Every brand's name for the gap wedge is pooled into one rung, since only 25 of 917 sets publish two of them.

The head half

Read the set through

Wilson FG Tour F5 Irons · 7

LOFT · X AXIS35°
95th percentile — weaker-lofted than 95% of the 889 sets that publish a 7-iron
LIE · Y AXIS62°
44th percentile — flatter than 56% of the 889 sets that publish a 7-iron
7-iron field: Loft × Lie

The 7-iron of every comparable iron set on record publishing both loft and lie — 889 of them, binned by density.

Specifications by option

What this record publishes. Across 9 options: loft, lie, length and swingweight on every one.

9 rows, unsorted, collapsed — use the button below the table to show every option.

213RH59.539.25D2
244RH / LH6038.75D2
275RH / LH6138.25D2
316RH / LH61.537.75D2
357RH / LH6237.25D2
398RH / LH6336.75D2
439RH / LH63.536.25D2
47PWRH / LH6435.75D2
51GWRH / LH6435.5D2

Head geometry doesn't change with the shaft, so it's stated once. A blank cell means Wilson did not publish that figure — we don't estimate.

Measured against comparable clubs

Where this club's published fitting specs sit among comparable clubs — never how good it is.

FigurePublishedAll ironsIts yearAmong its peers
Strongest-lofted 7-iron35°=838th of 953no release year on record=34th of 39 Wilson irons · =396th of 508 low-handicap irons
Widest loft range30°=552nd of 1,104no release year on record=18th of 42 Wilson irons · =191st of 508 low-handicap irons
Most upright lie62°=539th of 941no release year on record=2nd of 38 Wilson irons · =264th of 505 low-handicap irons
Longest37.3"=49th of 894no release year on record=17th of 38 Wilson irons · =8th of 466 low-handicap irons

player level — derived

This iron reads as built for a low-handicap player — our deterministic reading of 7-iron loft 35° (no offset published). A design classification, not a rule about who may play it. How the bands are read →

Compare this iron →

Or go straight to a comparison: vs PXG 0211 XCOR2 Irons | Players Distance Irons · vs XXIO 13 Ladies Irons · vs Titleist 1979-80 Tour Model

More irons

Other Wilson irons on record. Nothing here is a ranking or a recommendation. Browse every club →

What's on this page

In progress2 of 3 built

2 of 3 parts of this club page are built, and we're filling in the rest.

  • Wilson's own specs, partly built.Taken from Wilson's product page. We haven't found their full spec sheet for this club yet, so some figures they publish may be missing.
  • Published options, built.9 configurations with 4 of the 7 specs an iron can publish.
  • Stock shaft, built.Wilson names no stock shaft for this club on the sources we hold, so there's nothing to link.

The site is in beta and the database is still being built, so expect gaps. Know something we don't? Help us fill it in — a link to where it's published is worth more than anything else you could send.

Know something about this club? 8 fields we don't hold — or tell us something here is wrong