Titleist iron
The Titleist T250* Launch Spec Iron Set is an iron in 7 options from 27°–52°, RH and LH.
Built against the iron fieldpublished figures only
Image not published
Where this club lands
The field is every iron in the database that publishes both of the chart's figures — every brand, not just Titleist.
This set's 7-iron is 35° — 95th percentile, weaker-lofted than 95% of the 889 sets that publish one. The median is 32°.
Loft ladder against the field
Loft at each club in the set over the middle half (p25–p75) of every comparable iron set on record — the busiest rung here is built from 900.
Titleist T250* Launch Spec Iron Setmiddle half of the field
A break in the line is a club the set does not publish a loft for — it is never bridged, because joining across a gap would draw a loft the manufacturer never stated. Every brand's name for the gap wedge is pooled into one rung, since only 25 of 917 sets publish two of them.
The head half
Read the set through
Titleist T250* Launch Spec Iron Set · 7
- LOFT · X AXIS35°
- 95th percentile — weaker-lofted than 95% of the 889 sets that publish a 7-iron
- LIE · Y AXIS63°
- 97th percentile — more upright than 97% of the 889 sets that publish a 7-iron
7-iron field: Loft × Lie
The 7-iron of every comparable iron set on record publishing both loft and lie — 889 of them, binned by density.
Specifications by option
What this record publishes. Across 7 options: loft, lie and length on every one.
7 rows, unsorted.
| 27 | 5 | RH / LH | 62 | 38 |
| 31 | 6 | RH / LH | 62.5 | 37.5 |
| 35 | 7 | RH / LH | 63 | 37 |
| 39 | 8 | RH / LH | 63.5 | 36.5 |
| 43 | 9 | RH / LH | 64 | 36 |
| 47 | PW | RH / LH | 64 | 35.75 |
| 52 | W | RH / LH | 64 | 35.5 |
Head geometry doesn't change with the shaft, so it's stated once. A blank cell means Titleist did not publish that figure — we don't estimate.
Measured against comparable clubs
Where this club's published fitting specs sit among comparable clubs — never how good it is.
| Figure | Published | All irons | 2025 | Among its peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strongest-lofted 7-iron | 35° | =838th of 953 | =60th of 61 | =63rd of 124 Titleist irons · =396th of 508 low-handicap irons |
| Widest loft range | 25° | =871st of 1,104 | =53rd of 68 | =119th of 129 Titleist irons · =385th of 508 low-handicap irons |
| Most upright lie | 63° | =33rd of 941 | =5th of 61 | =1st of 124 Titleist irons · =8th of 505 low-handicap irons |
| Longest | 37" | =265th of 894 | =35th of 60 | =1st of 115 Titleist irons · =83rd of 466 low-handicap irons |
player level — derived
This iron reads as built for a low-handicap player — our deterministic reading of 7-iron loft 35° (no offset published). A design classification, not a rule about who may play it. How the bands are read →
Or go straight to a comparison: vs Cobra 3DP Tour Irons · vs Callaway Apex Ai150 · vs Wilson DYNAPWR Irons
More irons
Titleist T100 2025 · 20°–50° · 10 options · 6 stock shafts Titleist T150 2025 · 19°–48° · 10 options · 6 stock shafts Titleist T250 2025 · 18°–48° · 10 options · 6 stock shafts Titleist T250 Launch Spec 2025 · 27°–52° · 7 options · 6 stock shafts Ben Hogan Fort Worth CB Irons 2025 · 23°–46° · 7 options · 2 stock shafts Callaway Apex Ai150 2025 · 20°–49° · 9 options · 1 stock shaft Cobra 3DP Tour Irons 2025 · 19°–50° · 9 options Honma Malbon Performance Iron (Ladies) 2025 · 27°–56° · 7 options
Other Titleist irons on record. Irons released in 2025 by other brands, one per brand. Nothing here is a ranking or a recommendation. Browse every club →
What's on this page
In progress2 of 3 built
2 of 3 parts of this club page are built, and we're filling in the rest.
- Titleist's own specs, not built yet.We haven't found Titleist's own page for this club yet — everything here comes from the sources listed at the foot of the page.
- Published options, built.7 configurations with 3 of the 7 specs an iron can publish.
- Stock shaft, built.Titleist names no stock shaft for this club on the sources we hold, so there's nothing to link.
The site is in beta and the database is still being built, so expect gaps. Know something we don't? Help us fill it in — a link to where it's published is worth more than anything else you could send.