Cobra iron
The Cobra 3DP Tour Irons is an iron in 9 options from 19°–50°, RH and LH.
Image not published
Cobra iron
Image not published
The field is every iron in the database that publishes both of the chart's figures — every brand, not just Cobra.
This set's 7-iron is 31° — 45th percentile, stronger-lofted than 55% of the 889 sets that publish one. The median is 32°.
Loft at each club in the set over the middle half (p25–p75) of every comparable iron set on record — the busiest rung here is built from 900.
A break in the line is a club the set does not publish a loft for — it is never bridged, because joining across a gap would draw a loft the manufacturer never stated. Every brand's name for the gap wedge is pooled into one rung, since only 25 of 917 sets publish two of them.
Cobra 3DP Tour Irons · 7
The 7-iron of every comparable iron set on record publishing both loft and lie — 889 of them, binned by density.
Cobra 3DP Tour Irons · 7 — the leading edge sits behind the line of the shaft by the published figure, drawn to the scale marked and seen from the toe, which is the one view that shows offset truly: it runs perpendicular to the face, so a picture square to the face would have it pointing at you. The outline is a nominal iron — this database holds no head geometry — so the gap the arrow spans is the only measured thing in the frame. The dashed edge is the median of the 7-iron of 580 iron sets on record that publish one.
Cobra's published offset at each club, over the middle half (p25–p75) of every comparable set on record that publishes one.
A break in the line is a club the set does not publish an offset for — it is never bridged, because joining across a gap would draw an offset the manufacturer never stated. Every brand's name for the gap wedge is pooled into one rung, since only 25 of 917 sets publish two of them.
What this record publishes. Across 9 options: loft, lie and length on every one.
9 rows, unsorted, collapsed — use the button below the table to show every option.
| 19 | 3 | RH / LH | 60 | 0.134 | 39.25 |
| 21.5 | 4 | RH / LH | 60.5 | 0.118 | 38.75 |
| 24 | 5 | RH / LH | 61 | 0.106 | 38.25 |
| 27 | 6 | RH / LH | 61.5 | 0.094 | 37.75 |
| 31 | 7 | RH / LH | 62 | 0.083 | 37.25 |
| 35 | 8 | RH / LH | 62.5 | 0.079 | 36.75 |
| 40 | 9 | RH / LH | 63 | 0.067 | 36.25 |
| 45 | PW | RH / LH | 63.5 | 0.063 | 36 |
| 50 | GW | RH / LH | 63.5 | 0.063 | 35.75 |
Head geometry doesn't change with the shaft, so it's stated once. A blank cell means Cobra did not publish that figure — we don't estimate.
Cobra publishes offset in millimetres; the offset (in) column is that figure converted, and the record keeps Cobra's own figure verbatim.
Where this club's published fitting specs sit among comparable clubs — never how good it is.
| Figure | Published | All irons | 2025 | Among its peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strongest-lofted 7-iron | 31° | =332nd of 953 | =39th of 61 | =40th of 70 Cobra irons · =34th of 508 low-handicap irons |
| Most offset at the 7-iron | 0.083" | =521st of 583 | =48th of 50 | =42nd of 47 Cobra irons · =221st of 283 low-handicap irons |
| Widest loft range | 31° | =496th of 1,104 | =25th of 68 | =37th of 76 Cobra irons · =162nd of 508 low-handicap irons |
| Most upright lie | 62° | =539th of 941 | =31st of 61 | =61st of 70 Cobra irons · =264th of 505 low-handicap irons |
| Longest | 37.3" | =49th of 894 | =8th of 60 | =8th of 68 Cobra irons · =8th of 466 low-handicap irons |
This iron reads as built for a low-handicap player — our deterministic reading of 7-iron offset 0.083", 7-iron loft 31°. A design classification, not a rule about who may play it. How the bands are read →
Or go straight to a comparison: vs Callaway Apex Ai150 · vs Wilson DYNAPWR Irons · vs Tour Edge Exotics C725 Irons
Other Cobra irons on record. Irons released in 2025 by other brands, one per brand. Nothing here is a ranking or a recommendation. Browse every club →
2 of 3 parts of this club page are built, and we're filling in the rest.
The site is in beta and the database is still being built, so expect gaps. Know something we don't? Help us fill it in — a link to where it's published is worth more than anything else you could send.