PING iron
The PING Womens G Le4 Irons is an iron in 7 options from 25°–56°.
Image not published
PING iron
Image not published
The field is every iron in the database that publishes both of the chart's figures — every brand, not just PING.
This set's UW is 51.5° — 96th percentile, weaker-lofted than 96% of the 672 sets that publish one. The median is 50°. This set publishes no 7-iron, so it is read through the UW instead.
Loft at each club in the set over the middle half (p25–p75) of every comparable iron set on record — the busiest rung here is built from 900.
A break in the line is a club the set does not publish a loft for — it is never bridged, because joining across a gap would draw a loft the manufacturer never stated. Every brand's name for the gap wedge is pooled into one rung, since only 25 of 917 sets publish two of them.
PING Womens G Le4 Irons · UW
The UW of every comparable iron set on record publishing both loft and lie — 672 of them, binned by density.
PING Womens G Le4 Irons · UW — the leading edge sits behind the line of the shaft by the published figure, drawn to the scale marked and seen from the toe, which is the one view that shows offset truly: it runs perpendicular to the face, so a picture square to the face would have it pointing at you. The outline is a nominal iron — this database holds no head geometry — so the gap the arrow spans is the only measured thing in the frame. The dashed edge is the median of the GW/AW of 438 iron sets on record that publish one.
PING's published offset at each club, over the middle half (p25–p75) of every comparable set on record that publishes one.
A break in the line is a club the set does not publish an offset for — it is never bridged, because joining across a gap would draw an offset the manufacturer never stated. Every brand's name for the gap wedge is pooled into one rung, since only 25 of 917 sets publish two of them.
What this record publishes. Across 7 options: loft, lie and length on every one.
7 rows, unsorted.
| 25 | 6I | 61.5 | 0.2 | 8.1 | 37 |
| 29.5 | 7I | 62 | 0.18 | 9.7 | 36.5 |
| 35 | 8I | 62.8 | 0.15 | 10.1 | 36 |
| 41 | 9I | 63.5 | 0.13 | 11.6 | 35.5 |
| 46.5 | W | 64.1 | 0.11 | 12 | 35 |
| 51.5 | UW | 64.1 | 0.11 | 13.1 | 35 |
| 56 | SW | 64.4 | 0.1 | 13 | 34.5 |
Head geometry doesn't change with the shaft, so it's stated once. A blank cell means PING did not publish that figure — we don't estimate.
Where this club's published fitting specs sit among comparable clubs — never how good it is.
| Figure | Published | All irons | 2026 | Among its peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strongest-lofted 7-iron | 29.5° | =172nd of 953 | =25th of 56 | =10th of 68 PING irons · =139th of 208 high-handicap irons |
| Most offset at the 7-iron | 0.18" | =84th of 583 | =8th of 47 | =21st of 54 PING irons · =68th of 155 high-handicap irons |
| Widest loft range | 31° | =496th of 1,104 | =23rd of 57 | =45th of 71 PING irons · =157th of 208 high-handicap irons |
| Most upright lie | 62° | =539th of 941 | =35th of 56 | =34th of 66 PING irons · =119th of 203 high-handicap irons |
| Longest | 36.5" | =825th of 894 | =48th of 53 | =61st of 64 PING irons · =183rd of 201 high-handicap irons |
This iron reads as built for a high-handicap player — our deterministic reading of 7-iron offset 0.18", 7-iron loft 29.5°. A design classification, not a rule about who may play it. How the bands are read →
Or go straight to a comparison: vs Honma BERES 10 3-Star Iron · vs Cobra COBRA 3DP MB Irons · vs Wilson DYNAPWR Forged Steel Irons
Other PING irons on record. Irons released in 2026 by other brands, one per brand. Nothing here is a ranking or a recommendation. Browse every club →
2 of 3 parts of this club page are built, and we're filling in the rest.
The site is in beta and the database is still being built, so expect gaps. Know something we don't? Help us fill it in — a link to where it's published is worth more than anything else you could send.