Skip to content
Zomma Golf
Menu

PING iron

The PING Womens G Le4 Irons is an iron in 7 options from 25°–56°.

7
options
25–56
loft °
2026
released (est.)
Built against the iron fieldpublished figures only
DIFFERENCE FROM THE MEDIAN OF EVERY RECORD WE HOLDLOFTMEDIAN 33.0°41.0° +8LIEMEDIAN 62.5°63.5° +1LENGTHMEDIAN 37.00"35.50" -1.5OFFSETMEDIAN 0.115"0.130" +0.015
Each bar is this club's published figure minus the median of the 1,084 other irons on record that publish it — a median over the records we hold.

Image not published

Where this club lands

The field is every iron in the database that publishes both of the chart's figures — every brand, not just PING.

This set's UW is 51.5° — 96th percentile, weaker-lofted than 96% of the 672 sets that publish one. The median is 50°. This set publishes no 7-iron, so it is read through the UW instead.

Loft ladder against the field

Loft at each club in the set over the middle half (p25–p75) of every comparable iron set on record — the busiest rung here is built from 900.

PING Womens G Le4 Ironsmiddle half of the field
2030405060123456789PWGW/AWSWLWLOFT (°)PING Womens G Le4 Irons — W: 46.5°PING Womens G Le4 Irons — SW: 56°

A break in the line is a club the set does not publish a loft for — it is never bridged, because joining across a gap would draw a loft the manufacturer never stated. Every brand's name for the gap wedge is pooled into one rung, since only 25 of 917 sets publish two of them.

The head half

Read the set through

PING Womens G Le4 Irons · UW

LOFT · X AXIS51.5°
96th percentile — weaker-lofted than 96% of the 672 sets that publish a UW
LIE · Y AXIS64.1°
83rd percentile — more upright than 83% of the 672 sets that publish a UW
UW field: Loft × Lie

The UW of every comparable iron set on record publishing both loft and lie — 672 of them, binned by density.

Offset

Published offset of 0.11 in: the leading edge sits 0.11 in behind the line of the shaft, against a median of 0.075 in for the GW/AW of 438 iron sets on record that publish one.MEDIAN 0.075 inOFFSET 0.11 inSHAFTLEADING EDGE0.25 INLEADING EDGE BEHIND THE SHAFTNOMINAL OUTLINE · SEEN FROM THE TOE · TRUE SCALE

PING Womens G Le4 Irons · UW — the leading edge sits behind the line of the shaft by the published figure, drawn to the scale marked and seen from the toe, which is the one view that shows offset truly: it runs perpendicular to the face, so a picture square to the face would have it pointing at you. The outline is a nominal iron — this database holds no head geometry — so the gap the arrow spans is the only measured thing in the frame. The dashed edge is the median of the GW/AW of 438 iron sets on record that publish one.

Offset through the set, against the field

PING's published offset at each club, over the middle half (p25–p75) of every comparable set on record that publishes one.

PING Womens G Le4 Ironsmiddle half of the field
0.050.10.150.223456789PWGW/AWSWLWOFFSET (IN)PING Womens G Le4 Irons — W: 0.11 inPING Womens G Le4 Irons — SW: 0.1 in

A break in the line is a club the set does not publish an offset for — it is never bridged, because joining across a gap would draw an offset the manufacturer never stated. Every brand's name for the gap wedge is pooled into one rung, since only 25 of 917 sets publish two of them.

Specifications by option

What this record publishes. Across 7 options: loft, lie and length on every one.

7 rows, unsorted.

256I61.50.28.137
29.57I620.189.736.5
358I62.80.1510.136
419I63.50.1311.635.5
46.5W64.10.111235
51.5UW64.10.1113.135
56SW64.40.11334.5

Head geometry doesn't change with the shaft, so it's stated once. A blank cell means PING did not publish that figure — we don't estimate.

Measured against comparable clubs

Where this club's published fitting specs sit among comparable clubs — never how good it is.

FigurePublishedAll irons2026Among its peers
Strongest-lofted 7-iron29.5°=172nd of 953=25th of 56=10th of 68 PING irons · =139th of 208 high-handicap irons
Most offset at the 7-iron0.18"=84th of 583=8th of 47=21st of 54 PING irons · =68th of 155 high-handicap irons
Widest loft range31°=496th of 1,104=23rd of 57=45th of 71 PING irons · =157th of 208 high-handicap irons
Most upright lie62°=539th of 941=35th of 56=34th of 66 PING irons · =119th of 203 high-handicap irons
Longest36.5"=825th of 894=48th of 53=61st of 64 PING irons · =183rd of 201 high-handicap irons

player level — derived

This iron reads as built for a high-handicap player — our deterministic reading of 7-iron offset 0.18", 7-iron loft 29.5°. A design classification, not a rule about who may play it. How the bands are read →

Compare this iron →

Or go straight to a comparison: vs Honma BERES 10 3-Star Iron · vs Cobra COBRA 3DP MB Irons · vs Wilson DYNAPWR Forged Steel Irons

More irons

Other PING irons on record. Irons released in 2026 by other brands, one per brand. Nothing here is a ranking or a recommendation. Browse every club →

What's on this page

In progress2 of 3 built

2 of 3 parts of this club page are built, and we're filling in the rest.

  • PING's own specs, not built yet.We haven't found PING's own page for this club yet — everything here comes from the sources listed at the foot of the page.
  • Published options, built.7 configurations with 5 of the 7 specs an iron can publish.
  • Stock shaft, built.PING names no stock shaft for this club on the sources we hold, so there's nothing to link.

The site is in beta and the database is still being built, so expect gaps. Know something we don't? Help us fill it in — a link to where it's published is worth more than anything else you could send.

Know something about this club? 8 fields we don't hold — or tell us something here is wrong