Skip to content
Zomma Golf
Menu

PING iron

The PING i530 iron is an iron in 8 options from 19°–47°, RH and LH.

Discontinued. Kept here because the published specs still matter to anyone playing one or buying used.

8
options
19–47
loft °
2024
released
Built against the iron fieldpublished figures only
DIFFERENCE FROM THE MEDIAN OF EVERY RECORD WE HOLDLOFTMEDIAN 33.0°31.0° -2LIEMEDIAN 62.5°62.4° -0.1LENGTHMEDIAN 37.00"36.75" -0.25OFFSETMEDIAN 0.115"0.105" -0.01
Each bar is this club's published figure minus the median of the 1,084 other irons on record that publish it — a median over the records we hold.

View on PING →

Where this club lands

The field is every iron in the database that publishes both of the chart's figures — every brand, not just PING.

This set's 7-iron is 29° — 19th percentile, stronger-lofted than 81% of the 889 sets that publish one. The median is 32°.

Loft ladder against the field

Loft at each club in the set over the middle half (p25–p75) of every comparable iron set on record — the busiest rung here is built from 900.

PING i530middle half of the field
2030405060123456789PWGW/AWSWLWLOFT (°)PING i530 — 4: 19°PING i530 — 5: 22°PING i530 — 6: 25.5°PING i530 — 7: 29°PING i530 — 8: 33°PING i530 — 9: 37°PING i530 — PW: 42°PING i530 — UW: 47°

A break in the line is a club the set does not publish a loft for — it is never bridged, because joining across a gap would draw a loft the manufacturer never stated. Every brand's name for the gap wedge is pooled into one rung, since only 25 of 917 sets publish two of them.

The head half

Read the set through

PING i530 · 7-iron

LOFT · X AXIS29°
19th percentile — stronger-lofted than 81% of the 889 sets that publish a 7-iron
LIE · Y AXIS62°
44th percentile — flatter than 56% of the 889 sets that publish a 7-iron
7-iron field: Loft × Lie

The 7-iron of every comparable iron set on record publishing both loft and lie — 889 of them, binned by density.

Offset

Published offset of 0.12 in: the leading edge sits 0.12 in behind the line of the shaft, against a median of 0.12 in for the 7-iron of 580 iron sets on record that publish one.MEDIAN 0.12 inOFFSET 0.12 inSHAFTLEADING EDGE0.25 INLEADING EDGE BEHIND THE SHAFTNOMINAL OUTLINE · SEEN FROM THE TOE · TRUE SCALE

PING i530 · 7-iron — the leading edge sits behind the line of the shaft by the published figure, drawn to the scale marked and seen from the toe, which is the one view that shows offset truly: it runs perpendicular to the face, so a picture square to the face would have it pointing at you. The outline is a nominal iron — this database holds no head geometry — so the gap the arrow spans is the only measured thing in the frame. The dashed edge is the median of the 7-iron of 580 iron sets on record that publish one.

Offset through the set, against the field

PING's published offset at each club, over the middle half (p25–p75) of every comparable set on record that publishes one.

PING i530middle half of the field
0.050.10.150.223456789PWGW/AWSWLWOFFSET (IN)PING i530 — 4: 0.2 inPING i530 — 5: 0.17 inPING i530 — 6: 0.14 inPING i530 — 7: 0.12 inPING i530 — 8: 0.09 inPING i530 — 9: 0.07 inPING i530 — PW: 0.05 inPING i530 — UW: 0.03 in

A break in the line is a club the set does not publish an offset for — it is never bridged, because joining across a gap would draw an offset the manufacturer never stated. Every brand's name for the gap wedge is pooled into one rung, since only 25 of 917 sets publish two of them.

Specifications by option

What this record publishes. Across 8 options: loft, lie, length and swingweight on every one.

8 rows, unsorted.

194-ironRH / LH60.50.2638.875D11820
225-ironRH / LH610.17738.25D12124
25.56-ironRH / LH61.50.14837.625D12427.5
297-ironRH / LH620.12937D127.531
338-ironRH / LH62.80.0910.536.5D131.534.5
379-ironRH / LH63.50.071236D1.53638
42PWRH / LH64.10.051335.5D24142.5
47UWRH / LH64.10.031335.5D24647.5

Head geometry doesn't change with the shaft, so it's stated once. A blank cell means PING did not publish that figure — we don't estimate.

Measured against comparable clubs

Where this club's published fitting specs sit among comparable clubs — never how good it is.

FigurePublishedAll irons2024Among its peers
Strongest-lofted 7-iron29°=119th of 953=13th of 47=4th of 68 PING irons · =12th of 237 mid-handicap irons
Most offset at the 7-iron0.12"=286th of 58318th of 36=34th of 54 PING irons · =123rd of 145 mid-handicap irons
Widest loft range28°=719th of 1,104=31st of 53=59th of 71 PING irons · =177th of 237 mid-handicap irons
Most upright lie62°=539th of 941=17th of 46=34th of 66 PING irons · =158th of 233 mid-handicap irons
Longest37"=265th of 894=26th of 47=1st of 64 PING irons · =74th of 227 mid-handicap irons

player level — derived

This iron reads as built for a mid-handicap player — our deterministic reading of 7-iron offset 0.12", 7-iron loft 29°. A design classification, not a rule about who may play it. How the bands are read →

Compare this iron →

Or go straight to a comparison: vs Bridgestone 220 MB · vs New Level 702 CB · vs Callaway Apex Ai200

More irons

Other PING irons on record. Irons released in 2024 by other brands, one per brand. Nothing here is a ranking or a recommendation. Browse every club →

What's on this page

In progress2 of 3 built

2 of 3 parts of this club page are built, and we're filling in the rest.

  • PING's own specs, partly built.Taken from PING's product page. We haven't found their full spec sheet for this club yet, so some figures they publish may be missing.
  • Published options, built.8 configurations with 6 of the 7 specs an iron can publish.
  • Stock shaft, built.PING names no stock shaft for this club on the sources we hold, so there's nothing to link.

The site is in beta and the database is still being built, so expect gaps. Know something we don't? Help us fill it in — a link to where it's published is worth more than anything else you could send.

Know something about this club? 4 fields we don't hold — or tell us something here is wrong