PING fairway
Where this club lands
Two separate readings, because a club is two products. Each field is every fairway in the database that publishes both of that chart's figures — every brand, not just PING.
The head half
Across every option: this club's loft from the 31st to the 96th percentile, and length from the 18th to the 83rd percentile.
The cloud is every fairway head option on record that publishes both loft and length — 1,546 of them, binned by density.
The stock-shaft half
Across every build: this club's stock shafts run weight from the 1st to the 6th percentile.
Every fairway shaft variant on record publishing a weight — 1,882 of them, counted into 14 bars.
35 — 17 fairway shaft variants · 1% of 1,882
Specifications by option
What this record publishes. Across 5 options: loft, lie, length, swingweight and head weight on every one.
5 rows, unsorted.
| 15 | 3-wood | RH / LH | 56 | 43 | C9 | 210.8 | 186 |
| 17 | 4-wood | RH / LH | 56 | 43 | C9 | 210.8 | 180 |
| 19 | 5-wood | RH / LH | 56.5 | 42.5 | C9 | 214.7 | 174 |
| 21 | 7-wood | RH / LH | 57 | 42 | C9 | 219 | 165 |
| 24 | 9-wood | RH / LH | 57.5 | 41.5 | C9 | 223.3 | 157 |
Head geometry doesn't change with the shaft, so it's stated once. A blank cell means PING did not publish that figure — we don't estimate.
Stock shafts (1)
Every shaft PING lists as stock for this club, each with its own flexes, weight and torque. Open one for its full loft × flex build table.
PING ALTA Quick aftermarket specs pending 10 builds · 15°–24° · 2 flexes · 38–45 g
- Weight
- 38–45 g
- Launch
- high
- Flexes
- 35, 45
10 rows, unsorted.
| 15 | 3-wood | 35 | RH / LH | 38 | 56 | 43 | C9 |
| 15 | 3-wood | 45 | RH / LH | 45 | 56 | 43 | C9 |
| 17 | 4-wood | 35 | RH / LH | 38 | 56 | 43 | C9 |
| 17 | 4-wood | 45 | RH / LH | 45 | 56 | 43 | C9 |
| 19 | 5-wood | 35 | RH / LH | 38 | 56.5 | 42.5 | C9 |
| 19 | 5-wood | 45 | RH / LH | 45 | 56.5 | 42.5 | C9 |
| 21 | 7-wood | 35 | RH / LH | 38 | 57 | 42 | C9 |
| 21 | 7-wood | 45 | RH / LH | 45 | 57 | 42 | C9 |
| 24 | 9-wood | 35 | RH / LH | 38 | 57.5 | 41.5 | C9 |
| 24 | 9-wood | 45 | RH / LH | 45 | 57.5 | 41.5 | C9 |
Made-for means a version built for this club, not the aftermarket shaft of the same name — a different product with different specs. We keep them as separate records and never blur the two.
Measured against comparable clubs
Where this club's published fitting specs sit among comparable clubs — never how good it is.
| Figure | Published | All fairway woods | 2025 | Among its peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lowest published loft | 15° | =182nd of 548 | =8th of 43 | =3rd of 16 PING fairway woods · =12th of 126 high-handicap fairway woods |
| Widest loft range | 9° | =82nd of 531 | =4th of 40 | =6th of 14 PING fairway woods · =23rd of 126 high-handicap fairway woods |
| Most upright lie | 57.5° | =413th of 500 | =28th of 41 | =8th of 20 PING fairway woods · =108th of 117 high-handicap fairway woods |
| Longest | 43" | =205th of 551 | =24th of 42 | =1st of 20 PING fairway woods · =51st of 123 high-handicap fairway woods |
player level — derived
This fairway reads as built for a high-handicap player — our deterministic reading of manufacturer designation "max", "hl" (forgiveness / draw / lightweight line). A design classification, not a rule about who may play it. How the bands are read →
Or go straight to a comparison: vs Callaway Apex Utility Woods · vs Cobra DS-ADAPT LS Fairway · vs Wilson DYNAPWR Carbon Fairway Wood
More fairways
Other PING fairways on record. Fairways released in 2025 by other brands, one per brand. Nothing here is a ranking or a recommendation. Browse every club →
What's on this page
2 of 3 parts of this club page are built, and we're filling in the rest.
- PING's own specs, partly built.Taken from PING's product page. We haven't found their full spec sheet for this club yet, so some figures they publish may be missing.
- Published options, built.5 configurations, carrying every one of the 5 specs a fairway can publish.
- Stock shaft, built.1 stock shaft, each with its own specced page.
The site is in beta and the database is still being built, so expect gaps. Know something we don't? Help us fill it in — a link to where it's published is worth more than anything else you could send.