Honma iron
The Honma Bugatti Super Premium Iron is an iron in 8 options from 24°–56°, RH.
Built against the iron fieldpublished figures only
Where this club lands
The field is every iron in the database that publishes both of the chart's figures — every brand, not just Honma.
This set's 7-iron is 27° — 5th percentile, stronger-lofted than 95% of the 889 sets that publish one. The median is 32°.
Loft ladder against the field
Loft at each club in the set over the middle half (p25–p75) of every comparable iron set on record — the busiest rung here is built from 900.
Honma Bugatti Super Premium Ironmiddle half of the field
A break in the line is a club the set does not publish a loft for — it is never bridged, because joining across a gap would draw a loft the manufacturer never stated. Every brand's name for the gap wedge is pooled into one rung, since only 25 of 917 sets publish two of them.
The head half
Read the set through
10, 11 are in the set and on the ladder above, but too few sets on record publish those clubs to place them in a field of their own.
Honma Bugatti Super Premium Iron · #7
- LOFT · X AXIS27°
- 5th percentile — stronger-lofted than 95% of the 889 sets that publish a 7-iron
- LIE · Y AXIS62°
- 44th percentile — flatter than 56% of the 889 sets that publish a 7-iron
7-iron field: Loft × Lie
The 7-iron of every comparable iron set on record publishing both loft and lie — 889 of them, binned by density.
Offset
Honma Bugatti Super Premium Iron · #7 — the leading edge sits behind the line of the shaft by the published figure, drawn to the scale marked and seen from the toe, which is the one view that shows offset truly: it runs perpendicular to the face, so a picture square to the face would have it pointing at you. The outline is a nominal iron — this database holds no head geometry — so the gap the arrow spans is the only measured thing in the frame. The dashed edge is the median of the 7-iron of 580 iron sets on record that publish one.
Offset through the set, against the field
Honma's published offset at each club, over the middle half (p25–p75) of every comparable set on record that publishes one.
Honma Bugatti Super Premium Ironmiddle half of the field
A break in the line is a club the set does not publish an offset for — it is never bridged, because joining across a gap would draw an offset the manufacturer never stated. Every brand's name for the gap wedge is pooled into one rung, since only 25 of 917 sets publish two of them.
Specifications by option
What this record publishes. Across 8 options: loft, lie and length on every one.
8 rows, unsorted.
| 24 | #6 | 61.5 | 0.146 | 37.75 | Body:17-4/Casting Face:C300 |
| 27 | #7 | 62 | 0.138 | 37.25 | not published |
| 31 | #8 | 62.5 | 0.138 | 36.75 | not published |
| 35 | #9 | 63 | 0.138 | 36.25 | not published |
| 40 | #10 | 63 | 0.138 | 35.75 | not published |
| 45 | #11 | 63 | 0.118 | 35.5 | not published |
| 50 | AW | 63 | 0.118 | 35.5 | not published |
| 56 | SW | 64 | 0.079 | 35 | not published |
Head geometry doesn't change with the shaft, so it's stated once. A blank cell means Honma did not publish that figure — we don't estimate.
Stock shafts
Honma states this about the shaft this club ships with, quoted exactly as the record holds it:
- Stock shaft 'BERES for BUGATTI' (tier-branded ARMRQ BUGATTI): swingweight/assembled weight by flex, R = C9 (D0 for SW) / 353-391g across #6-SW; S = C9 (D0 for SW) / 359-397g across #6-SW (both per the 3-Star set page; identical across tiers).
We hold no shaft record matching that name, so there is nothing to link to and no weight, torque or flex profile to show — naming one on a guess would attach another product's numbers to this club. Browse every shaft instead.
Measured against comparable clubs
Where this club's published fitting specs sit among comparable clubs — never how good it is.
| Figure | Published | All irons | 2026 | Among its peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strongest-lofted 7-iron | 27° | =12th of 953 | =1st of 56 | =1st of 40 Honma irons · =12th of 208 high-handicap irons |
| Most offset at the 7-iron | 0.138" | =182nd of 583 | 19th of 47 | =1st of 17 Honma irons · =127th of 155 high-handicap irons |
| Widest loft range | 32° | =462nd of 1,104 | 20th of 57 | =20th of 43 Honma irons · =150th of 208 high-handicap irons |
| Most upright lie | 62° | =539th of 941 | =35th of 56 | =10th of 35 Honma irons · =119th of 203 high-handicap irons |
| Longest | 37.3" | =49th of 894 | =2nd of 53 | =1st of 31 Honma irons · =24th of 201 high-handicap irons |
player level — derived
This iron reads as built for a high-handicap player — our deterministic reading of 7-iron offset 0.138", 7-iron loft 27° (strong distance loft). A design classification, not a rule about who may play it. How the bands are read →
Or go straight to a comparison: vs Cobra COBRA 3DP MB Irons · vs Wilson DYNAPWR Forged Steel Irons · vs Tour Edge Exotics CB Irons
More irons
Honma BERES 10 3-Star Iron 2026 · 21°–55° · 9 options · 1 stock shaft Honma BERES 10 4-Star Iron 2026 · 21°–55° · 9 options · 1 stock shaft Honma BERES 10 5-Star Iron 2026 · 21°–55° · 9 options · 1 stock shaft Honma Bugatti Premium Iron 2026 · 25°–56° · 8 options · 1 stock shaft Callaway Quantum Max 2026 · 19°–55° · 10 options · 3 stock shafts Cobra BAFFLER Irons 2026 · 21°–56° · 9 options Miura LC-930 2026 · 22°–48° · 8 options Mizuno Mizuno Pro M-13 2026 · 22°–48° · 8 options · 4 stock shafts
Other Honma irons on record. Irons released in 2026 by other brands, one per brand. Nothing here is a ranking or a recommendation. Browse every club →
What's on this page
In progress2 of 3 built
2 of 3 parts of this club page are built, and we're filling in the rest.
- Honma's own specs, partly built.Taken from Honma's product page. We haven't found their full spec sheet for this club yet, so some figures they publish may be missing.
- Published options, built.8 configurations with 4 of the 7 specs an iron can publish.
- Stock shaft, built.Honma names no stock shaft for this club on the sources we hold, so there's nothing to link.
The site is in beta and the database is still being built, so expect gaps. Know something we don't? Help us fill it in — a link to where it's published is worth more than anything else you could send.