Skip to content
Zomma Golf
Menu

Callaway iron

The Callaway Womens REVA Rise Irons is an iron in 7 options from 27°–56°, RH and LH.

7
options
27–56
loft °
Built against the iron fieldpublished figures only
DIFFERENCE FROM THE MEDIAN OF EVERY RECORD WE HOLDLOFTMEDIAN 33.0°41.0° +8LIEMEDIAN 62.5°63.0° +0.5LENGTHMEDIAN 37.00"35.00" -2OFFSETMEDIAN 0.115"0.079" -0.036
Each bar is this club's published figure minus the median of the 1,084 other irons on record that publish it — a median over the records we hold.

Image not published

Where this club lands

The field is every iron in the database that publishes both of the chart's figures — every brand, not just Callaway.

This set's 7-iron is 31° — 45th percentile, stronger-lofted than 55% of the 889 sets that publish one. The median is 32°.

Loft ladder against the field

Loft at each club in the set over the middle half (p25–p75) of every comparable iron set on record — the busiest rung here is built from 900.

Callaway Womens REVA Rise Ironsmiddle half of the field
2030405060123456789PWGW/AWSWLWLOFT (°)Callaway Womens REVA Rise Irons — 6: 27°Callaway Womens REVA Rise Irons — 7: 31°Callaway Womens REVA Rise Irons — 8: 36°Callaway Womens REVA Rise Irons — 9: 41°Callaway Womens REVA Rise Irons — PW: 46°Callaway Womens REVA Rise Irons — AW: 51°Callaway Womens REVA Rise Irons — SW: 56°

A break in the line is a club the set does not publish a loft for — it is never bridged, because joining across a gap would draw a loft the manufacturer never stated. Every brand's name for the gap wedge is pooled into one rung, since only 25 of 917 sets publish two of them.

The head half

Read the set through

Callaway Womens REVA Rise Irons · 7

LOFT · X AXIS31°
45th percentile — stronger-lofted than 55% of the 889 sets that publish a 7-iron
LIE · Y AXIS61.5°
11th percentile — flatter than 89% of the 889 sets that publish a 7-iron
7-iron field: Loft × Lie

The 7-iron of every comparable iron set on record publishing both loft and lie — 889 of them, binned by density.

Offset

Published offset of 0.13 in (published as 3.3 mm): the leading edge sits 0.13 in behind the line of the shaft, against a median of 0.12 in for the 7-iron of 580 iron sets on record that publish one.MEDIAN 0.12 inOFFSET 0.13 in · 3.3 mm as publishedSHAFTLEADING EDGE0.25 INLEADING EDGE BEHIND THE SHAFTNOMINAL OUTLINE · SEEN FROM THE TOE · TRUE SCALE

Callaway Womens REVA Rise Irons · 7 — the leading edge sits behind the line of the shaft by the published figure, drawn to the scale marked and seen from the toe, which is the one view that shows offset truly: it runs perpendicular to the face, so a picture square to the face would have it pointing at you. The outline is a nominal iron — this database holds no head geometry — so the gap the arrow spans is the only measured thing in the frame. The dashed edge is the median of the 7-iron of 580 iron sets on record that publish one.

Offset through the set, against the field

Callaway's published offset at each club, over the middle half (p25–p75) of every comparable set on record that publishes one.

Callaway Womens REVA Rise Ironsmiddle half of the field
0.050.10.150.223456789PWGW/AWSWLWOFFSET (IN)Callaway Womens REVA Rise Irons — 6: 0.15 inCallaway Womens REVA Rise Irons — 7: 0.13 inCallaway Womens REVA Rise Irons — 8: 0.106 inCallaway Womens REVA Rise Irons — 9: 0.079 inCallaway Womens REVA Rise Irons — PW: 0.059 inCallaway Womens REVA Rise Irons — AW: 0.059 inCallaway Womens REVA Rise Irons — SW: 0.059 in

A break in the line is a club the set does not publish an offset for — it is never bridged, because joining across a gap would draw an offset the manufacturer never stated. Every brand's name for the gap wedge is pooled into one rung, since only 25 of 917 sets publish two of them.

Specifications by option

What this record publishes. Across 7 options: loft, lie, length and swingweight on every one.

7 rows, unsorted.

276RH / LH60.750.1537.25C3
317RH / LH61.50.1336.5C3
368RH / LH62.250.10635.75C3
419RH / LH630.07935C3
46PWRH / LH63.250.05934.75C3
51AWRH / LH63.50.05934.5C3
56SWRH / LH63.50.05934.5C3

Head geometry doesn't change with the shaft, so it's stated once. A blank cell means Callaway did not publish that figure — we don't estimate.

Callaway publishes offset in millimetres; the offset (in) column is that figure converted, and the record keeps Callaway's own figure verbatim.

Measured against comparable clubs

Where this club's published fitting specs sit among comparable clubs — never how good it is.

FigurePublishedAll ironsIts yearAmong its peers
Strongest-lofted 7-iron31°=332nd of 953no release year on record=59th of 121 Callaway irons · =125th of 237 mid-handicap irons
Most offset at the 7-iron0.13"=227th of 583no release year on record=37th of 74 Callaway irons · =81st of 145 mid-handicap irons
Widest loft range29°=629th of 1,104no release year on record=96th of 125 Callaway irons · =159th of 237 mid-handicap irons
Most upright lie61.5°=835th of 941no release year on record=111th of 121 Callaway irons · =211th of 233 mid-handicap irons
Longest36.5"=825th of 894no release year on record=97th of 112 Callaway irons · =203rd of 227 mid-handicap irons

player level — derived

This iron reads as built for a mid-handicap player — our deterministic reading of 7-iron offset 0.13", 7-iron loft 31°. A design classification, not a rule about who may play it. How the bands are read →

Compare this iron →

Or go straight to a comparison: vs PXG 0211 XCOR2 Irons | Players Distance Irons · vs XXIO 13 Ladies Irons · vs Titleist 1979-80 Tour Model

More irons

Other Callaway irons on record. Nothing here is a ranking or a recommendation. Browse every club →

What's on this page

In progress2 of 3 built

2 of 3 parts of this club page are built, and we're filling in the rest.

  • Callaway's own specs, not built yet.We haven't found Callaway's own page for this club yet — everything here comes from the sources listed at the foot of the page.
  • Published options, built.7 configurations with 5 of the 7 specs an iron can publish.
  • Stock shaft, built.Callaway names no stock shaft for this club on the sources we hold, so there's nothing to link.

The site is in beta and the database is still being built, so expect gaps. Know something we don't? Help us fill it in — a link to where it's published is worth more than anything else you could send.

Know something about this club? 8 fields we don't hold — or tell us something here is wrong