Callaway iron
The Callaway EPIC Star Iron Set is an iron in 10 options from 18°–54°, RH and LH.
Image not published
Callaway iron
Image not published
The field is every iron in the database that publishes both of the chart's figures — every brand, not just Callaway.
This set's 7-iron is 26° — 1st percentile, stronger-lofted than 99% of the 889 sets that publish one. The median is 32°.
Loft at each club in the set over the middle half (p25–p75) of every comparable iron set on record — the busiest rung here is built from 900.
A break in the line is a club the set does not publish a loft for — it is never bridged, because joining across a gap would draw a loft the manufacturer never stated. Every brand's name for the gap wedge is pooled into one rung, since only 25 of 917 sets publish two of them.
Callaway EPIC Star Iron Set · 7
The 7-iron of every comparable iron set on record publishing both loft and lie — 889 of them, binned by density.
Callaway EPIC Star Iron Set · 7 — the leading edge sits behind the line of the shaft by the published figure, drawn to the scale marked and seen from the toe, which is the one view that shows offset truly: it runs perpendicular to the face, so a picture square to the face would have it pointing at you. The outline is a nominal iron — this database holds no head geometry — so the gap the arrow spans is the only measured thing in the frame. The dashed edge is the median of the 7-iron of 580 iron sets on record that publish one.
Callaway's published offset at each club, over the middle half (p25–p75) of every comparable set on record that publishes one.
A break in the line is a club the set does not publish an offset for — it is never bridged, because joining across a gap would draw an offset the manufacturer never stated. Every brand's name for the gap wedge is pooled into one rung, since only 25 of 917 sets publish two of them.
What this record publishes. Across 10 options: loft, lie, length and swingweight on every one.
10 rows, unsorted, collapsed — use the button below the table to show every option.
| 18 | 4 | RH / LH | 60 | 0.22 | 39.5 | C8 |
| 20.5 | 5 | RH / LH | 60.5 | 0.2 | 38.875 | C8 |
| 23 | 6 | RH / LH | 61.3 | 0.18 | 38.25 | C8 |
| 26 | 7 | RH / LH | 62 | 0.16 | 37.625 | C8 |
| 30 | 8 | RH / LH | 62.5 | 0.15 | 37 | C8 |
| 34.5 | 9 | RH / LH | 63 | 0.14 | 36.5 | C8 |
| 39 | PW | RH / LH | 63.5 | 0.13 | 36 | C8 |
| 44 | AW | RH / LH | 64 | 0.12 | 35.75 | C8 |
| 49 | GW | RH / LH | 64 | 0.11 | 35.5 | C8 |
| 54 | SW | RH / LH | 64 | 0.1 | 35.25 | C8 |
Head geometry doesn't change with the shaft, so it's stated once. A blank cell means Callaway did not publish that figure — we don't estimate.
Where this club's published fitting specs sit among comparable clubs — never how good it is.
| Figure | Published | All irons | Its year | Among its peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strongest-lofted 7-iron | 26° | =1st of 953 | no release year on record | =1st of 121 Callaway irons · =1st of 208 high-handicap irons |
| Most offset at the 7-iron | 0.16" | =127th of 583 | no release year on record | 22nd of 74 Callaway irons · =105th of 155 high-handicap irons |
| Widest loft range | 36° | =280th of 1,104 | no release year on record | =40th of 125 Callaway irons · =67th of 208 high-handicap irons |
| Most upright lie | 62° | =539th of 941 | no release year on record | =69th of 121 Callaway irons · =119th of 203 high-handicap irons |
| Longest | 37.6" | =5th of 894 | no release year on record | =4th of 112 Callaway irons · =2nd of 201 high-handicap irons |
This iron reads as built for a high-handicap player — our deterministic reading of 7-iron offset 0.16", 7-iron loft 26°. A design classification, not a rule about who may play it. How the bands are read →
Or go straight to a comparison: vs PXG 0211 XCOR2 Irons | Players Distance Irons · vs XXIO 13 Ladies Irons · vs Titleist 1979-80 Tour Model
Other Callaway irons on record. Nothing here is a ranking or a recommendation. Browse every club →
2 of 3 parts of this club page are built, and we're filling in the rest.
The site is in beta and the database is still being built, so expect gaps. Know something we don't? Help us fill it in — a link to where it's published is worth more than anything else you could send.