Skip to content
Zomma Golf
Menu

Callaway iron

The Callaway EPIC Star Iron Set is an iron in 10 options from 18°–54°, RH and LH.

10
options
18–54
loft °
Built against the iron fieldpublished figures only
DIFFERENCE FROM THE MEDIAN OF EVERY RECORD WE HOLDLOFTMEDIAN 33.0°32.3° -0.8LIEMEDIAN 62.5°62.8° +0.3LENGTHMEDIAN 37.00"36.75" -0.25OFFSETMEDIAN 0.115"0.145" +0.03
Each bar is this club's published figure minus the median of the 1,084 other irons on record that publish it — a median over the records we hold.

Image not published

Where this club lands

The field is every iron in the database that publishes both of the chart's figures — every brand, not just Callaway.

This set's 7-iron is 26° — 1st percentile, stronger-lofted than 99% of the 889 sets that publish one. The median is 32°.

Loft ladder against the field

Loft at each club in the set over the middle half (p25–p75) of every comparable iron set on record — the busiest rung here is built from 900.

Callaway EPIC Star Iron Setmiddle half of the field
2030405060123456789PWGW/AWSWLWLOFT (°)Callaway EPIC Star Iron Set — 4: 18°Callaway EPIC Star Iron Set — 5: 20.5°Callaway EPIC Star Iron Set — 6: 23°Callaway EPIC Star Iron Set — 7: 26°Callaway EPIC Star Iron Set — 8: 30°Callaway EPIC Star Iron Set — 9: 34.5°Callaway EPIC Star Iron Set — PW: 39°Callaway EPIC Star Iron Set — AW: 44°Callaway EPIC Star Iron Set — SW: 54°

A break in the line is a club the set does not publish a loft for — it is never bridged, because joining across a gap would draw a loft the manufacturer never stated. Every brand's name for the gap wedge is pooled into one rung, since only 25 of 917 sets publish two of them.

The head half

Read the set through

Callaway EPIC Star Iron Set · 7

LOFT · X AXIS26°
1st percentile — stronger-lofted than 99% of the 889 sets that publish a 7-iron
LIE · Y AXIS62°
44th percentile — flatter than 56% of the 889 sets that publish a 7-iron
7-iron field: Loft × Lie

The 7-iron of every comparable iron set on record publishing both loft and lie — 889 of them, binned by density.

Offset

Published offset of 0.16 in: the leading edge sits 0.16 in behind the line of the shaft, against a median of 0.12 in for the 7-iron of 580 iron sets on record that publish one.MEDIAN 0.12 inOFFSET 0.16 inSHAFTLEADING EDGE0.25 INLEADING EDGE BEHIND THE SHAFTNOMINAL OUTLINE · SEEN FROM THE TOE · TRUE SCALE

Callaway EPIC Star Iron Set · 7 — the leading edge sits behind the line of the shaft by the published figure, drawn to the scale marked and seen from the toe, which is the one view that shows offset truly: it runs perpendicular to the face, so a picture square to the face would have it pointing at you. The outline is a nominal iron — this database holds no head geometry — so the gap the arrow spans is the only measured thing in the frame. The dashed edge is the median of the 7-iron of 580 iron sets on record that publish one.

Offset through the set, against the field

Callaway's published offset at each club, over the middle half (p25–p75) of every comparable set on record that publishes one.

Callaway EPIC Star Iron Setmiddle half of the field
0.050.10.150.223456789PWGW/AWSWLWOFFSET (IN)Callaway EPIC Star Iron Set — 4: 0.22 inCallaway EPIC Star Iron Set — 5: 0.2 inCallaway EPIC Star Iron Set — 6: 0.18 inCallaway EPIC Star Iron Set — 7: 0.16 inCallaway EPIC Star Iron Set — 8: 0.15 inCallaway EPIC Star Iron Set — 9: 0.14 inCallaway EPIC Star Iron Set — PW: 0.13 inCallaway EPIC Star Iron Set — AW: 0.12 inCallaway EPIC Star Iron Set — SW: 0.1 in

A break in the line is a club the set does not publish an offset for — it is never bridged, because joining across a gap would draw an offset the manufacturer never stated. Every brand's name for the gap wedge is pooled into one rung, since only 25 of 917 sets publish two of them.

Specifications by option

What this record publishes. Across 10 options: loft, lie, length and swingweight on every one.

10 rows, unsorted, collapsed — use the button below the table to show every option.

184RH / LH600.2239.5C8
20.55RH / LH60.50.238.875C8
236RH / LH61.30.1838.25C8
267RH / LH620.1637.625C8
308RH / LH62.50.1537C8
34.59RH / LH630.1436.5C8
39PWRH / LH63.50.1336C8
44AWRH / LH640.1235.75C8
49GWRH / LH640.1135.5C8
54SWRH / LH640.135.25C8

Head geometry doesn't change with the shaft, so it's stated once. A blank cell means Callaway did not publish that figure — we don't estimate.

Measured against comparable clubs

Where this club's published fitting specs sit among comparable clubs — never how good it is.

FigurePublishedAll ironsIts yearAmong its peers
Strongest-lofted 7-iron26°=1st of 953no release year on record=1st of 121 Callaway irons · =1st of 208 high-handicap irons
Most offset at the 7-iron0.16"=127th of 583no release year on record22nd of 74 Callaway irons · =105th of 155 high-handicap irons
Widest loft range36°=280th of 1,104no release year on record=40th of 125 Callaway irons · =67th of 208 high-handicap irons
Most upright lie62°=539th of 941no release year on record=69th of 121 Callaway irons · =119th of 203 high-handicap irons
Longest37.6"=5th of 894no release year on record=4th of 112 Callaway irons · =2nd of 201 high-handicap irons

player level — derived

This iron reads as built for a high-handicap player — our deterministic reading of 7-iron offset 0.16", 7-iron loft 26°. A design classification, not a rule about who may play it. How the bands are read →

Compare this iron →

Or go straight to a comparison: vs PXG 0211 XCOR2 Irons | Players Distance Irons · vs XXIO 13 Ladies Irons · vs Titleist 1979-80 Tour Model

More irons

Other Callaway irons on record. Nothing here is a ranking or a recommendation. Browse every club →

What's on this page

In progress2 of 3 built

2 of 3 parts of this club page are built, and we're filling in the rest.

  • Callaway's own specs, not built yet.We haven't found Callaway's own page for this club yet — everything here comes from the sources listed at the foot of the page.
  • Published options, built.10 configurations with 5 of the 7 specs an iron can publish.
  • Stock shaft, built.Callaway names no stock shaft for this club on the sources we hold, so there's nothing to link.

The site is in beta and the database is still being built, so expect gaps. Know something we don't? Help us fill it in — a link to where it's published is worth more than anything else you could send.

Know something about this club? 8 fields we don't hold — or tell us something here is wrong