Skip to content
Zomma Golf
Menu

Woodcreek Golf Club is an 18-hole course in Roseville, California.

It plays 6,518 yards from the Gold tees, rated 72.2/133 (checked 2026-08-21).

Create a free account to save Woodcreek Golf Club to My Game, where every course you save is measured against the rest of its state on the figures it publishes.
18
holes
72
par
6,518
yards (tips)
133
slope (gold)
The shape of the round · Gold teespublished figures only
HOLE ORDER — GOLD TEES398348375174533427319219525552306321367197426486133412142434435564748395105114124134143154165173184PAROUT 3,318 YDSIN 3,200 YDSFIRST NINESECOND NINE
The published card in playing order, 18 holes with the two nines split — hole number under each bar, its par below that.

The course

address
5880 Woodcreek Oaks Blvd, Roseville, CA 95747, USA
phone
831-320-2228
elevation
138 ft derived
on site
restaurant · lessons

38.77709, -121.33145 — open on OpenStreetMap →

The course, from above

This map shows all 18 holes. 3 mapped features sit close to more than one hole and are drawn with the nearer one.

218 traced features across 7 layers for Woodcreek Golf Club, drawn over NAIP 2022 aerial imagery.

Use arrow keys to pan, plus and minus to zoom. Tab reaches the map controls.

218 traced features across 7 layers for Woodcreek Golf Club, drawn over NAIP 2022 aerial imagery. The map itself needs JavaScript; the geometry is a plain GeoJSON file either way.

18
Holes
29
Fairways
51
Bunkers
8
Water
18
Greens
75
Tee pads
6,518yds
Gold tees
552yds
Longest hole
133yds
Shortest hole

Imported from OpenStreetMap, edges unchecked · USDA NAIP 2022-07-09

Tees & ratings

Ratingsreported, not from the clubchecked 2026-08-21

All 7 tee sets par, yardage, course rating, slope — the full table

Sorted by Yards, descending. 7 rows.

GoldM72651872.213333183200
BlueM72604170.512130103031
WhiteM72548367.111727382745
White (W)F72548371.2126
GreenM72473966.211222992440
Green (W)F72473966.2112
BlackM72427762.110321012176

Every figure as published; a blank cell is one nobody publishes. Front 9 and Back 9 are summed from the per-hole yardages on the scorecard.

Scorecard

Scorecardreported, not from the clubchecked 2026-08-21

Hole 123456789101112131415161718 Total
Par 444354435544434534 72
Gold 398348375174533427319219525552306321367197426486133412 6,518
Blue 376311345148499399300128504523292293341183408474119398 6,041
White 337290317122453376267109467477275264305175359428103359 5,483
Green 2942572581004172932558933640624623826216432938982324 4,739
Black 2542572051003552502558933636520623826210027038982264 4,277

We don't hold a stroke index for this course's holes, so that row is not above. The yardages are every figure we hold hole by hole.

No per-hole yardages are published for White (W) and Green (W), so they are not on the card above.

The Studio

The Studio can't plan Woodcreek Golf Club hole by hole yet.

We hold its scorecard and 218 traced features, but not a model of every green, which a plan aims at.

It plans 4,579 courses hole by hole today, and it charts your bag anywhere.

  • The approach, planned A Studio approach map on the aerial photo: a lob wedge aimed at the island green, its spread drawn as a dashed ring over the water, and the side it most often misses. Example from another course: hole 15, Resort tee, Stadium Course at TPC Scottsdale
  • The green, from LiDAR A Studio green view on the aerial photo: arrows for the slope a LiDAR survey measured, the area a cup could be cut, and the safer side to miss. Example from another course: hole 15, Stadium Course at TPC Scottsdale
  • Every shot, tee to green A Studio plan on the aerial photo of a desert par 4: the driver off the tee and a 7-iron into the green between the bunkers, each shot with its landing spread drawn as a dashed ring. Example from another course: hole 2, Resort tee, Stadium Course at TPC Scottsdale

See the courses it plans Open the Studio

Pictures: Studio output for a sample golfer, drawn 2026-10-15. The Studio needs a free account. AI can make mistakes.

© OpenStreetMap contributors

Book a tee time

Rates change by day and by season, so we send you to Woodcreek Golf Club's own booking page rather than quoting a figure that was true the week we captured it.

Check tee times and rates

Also bookable nearby: Wood Creek Golf Links (0.0 mi) · Timber Creek Golf Course Lakes Oaks (0.9 mi) · Timber Creek Golf Course Sierra Pines (0.9 mi) · Antelope Greens Golf Course (5.6 mi)

Measured against comparable courses

How hard and how long this course plays against comparable courses — never how good it is.

FigureThis courseIn CaliforniaNationwideAmong its peers
Longest6,518 yds=505th of 889=5,900th of 12,02528th of 49 in the Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom, CA metro area · =5,851st of 9,017 18-hole regulation courses
Toughest testslope 133=238th of 750=2,813th of 8,710=16th of 47 in the Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom, CA metro area · =2,750th of 7,089 18-hole regulation courses
Hardest from the tipsrating 72.2=356th of 685=3,733rd of 7,61523rd of 45 in the Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom, CA metro area · =3,694th of 7,034 18-hole regulation courses
Widest tee spread2,241 yds between tees96th of 857=1,285th of 11,5237th of 48 in the Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom, CA metro area · =1,253rd of 8,962 18-hole regulation courses
Highest above sea level138 ft derived =657th of 917=9,591st of 12,43729th of 51 in the Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom, CA metro area · =6,907th of 9,106 18-hole regulation courses

A published figure is compared only against the courses that publish it too, which is why the totals differ from row to row — a state's length field is the courses with a scorecard, not the courses in the state. Height above sea level is the exception: we derive it from a coordinate, so its field is very nearly every course we render. Ties share an ordinal and are marked =. How this is computed →

What's on this page

In progress4 of 6 built

4 of 6 parts of this course page are built, and we're filling in the rest.

  • Scorecard, built.Par and yardage for every hole, from 5 sets of tees.
  • Course rating and slope, built.Rated from 7 sets of tees.
  • Course map, built.All 18 greens drawn, with the fairways, bunkers and water, over aerial imagery.
  • Per-hole distances, built.Every hole is traced, so carries and distances to the front, middle and back of each green are measured along the line you actually play.
  • Green contours, not built yet.We haven't built the green contours for this course yet.
  • Course details, partly built.3 of 7 background details — we don't hold the architect, the year it opened and whether it is public or private, and 1 more.

The site is in beta and the database is still being built, so expect gaps. Know something we don't? Help us fill it in — a link to where it's published is worth more than anything else you could send.

Sources

Gathered from the course's own site and public records — every figure on this page is traceable to who published it and when. Spot an error or a gap? Tell us.

Location and identity seeded from OpenStreetMap — © OpenStreetMap contributors, ODbL. Last checked 2026-08-21. Where each figure came from is stated beside it, above.

Compare this course →

Or go straight to a comparison: vs Wood Creek Golf Links · vs Timber Creek Golf Course Lakes Oaks · vs Timber Creek Golf Course Sierra Pines

Nearby courses

Wood Creek Golf Links

0.0 mi · Roseville · public · 18 holes

Timber Creek Golf Course Lakes Oaks

0.9 mi · Roseville · public · 18 holes

Timber Creek Golf Course Sierra Pines

0.9 mi · Roseville · public · 9 holes

Diamond Oaks Municipal Golf Course

2.5 mi · Roseville · 18 holes

Sierra View Country Club

2.6 mi · Roseville · private · 18 holes

Morgan Creek Golf and Country Club

2.8 mi · Roseville · private · 18 holes

Antelope Greens Golf Course

5.6 mi · Antelope · public · 18 holes

Whitney Oaks Golf Club

5.8 mi · Rocklin · 18 holes

Straight-line distance from this course's coordinates, within 60 miles — not driving distance, and it crosses state lines where the nearest courses are over one.

Know something about this course? 10 fields we don't hold — or tell us something here is wrong