Skip to content
Zomma Golf
Menu

Tour Edge iron

The Tour Edge Exotics C722 Irons is an iron in 9 options from 19°–49°, RH.

9
options
19–49
loft °
2022
released
Built against the iron fieldpublished figures only
DIFFERENCE FROM THE MEDIAN OF EVERY RECORD WE HOLDLOFTMEDIAN 33.0°30.0° -3LIEMEDIAN 62.5°63.0° +0.5LENGTHMEDIAN 37.00"37.25" +0.25
Each bar is this club's published figure minus the median of the 1,118 other irons on record that publish it — a median over the records we hold.

View on Tour Edge →

Where this club lands

The field is every iron in the database that publishes both of the chart's figures — every brand, not just Tour Edge.

This set's 7-iron is 30° — 31st percentile, stronger-lofted than 69% of the 889 sets that publish one. The median is 32°.

Loft ladder against the field

Loft at each club in the set over the middle half (p25–p75) of every comparable iron set on record — the busiest rung here is built from 900.

Tour Edge Exotics C722 Ironsmiddle half of the field
2030405060123456789PWGW/AWSWLWLOFT (°)Tour Edge Exotics C722 Irons — 3: 19°Tour Edge Exotics C722 Irons — 4: 21°Tour Edge Exotics C722 Irons — 5: 23°Tour Edge Exotics C722 Irons — 6: 26.5°Tour Edge Exotics C722 Irons — 7: 30°Tour Edge Exotics C722 Irons — 8: 34°Tour Edge Exotics C722 Irons — 9: 39°Tour Edge Exotics C722 Irons — PW: 44°Tour Edge Exotics C722 Irons — AW: 49°

A break in the line is a club the set does not publish a loft for — it is never bridged, because joining across a gap would draw a loft the manufacturer never stated. Every brand's name for the gap wedge is pooled into one rung, since only 25 of 917 sets publish two of them.

The head half

Read the set through

Tour Edge Exotics C722 Irons · 7

LOFT · X AXIS30°
31st percentile — stronger-lofted than 69% of the 889 sets that publish a 7-iron
LIE · Y AXIS63°
97th percentile — more upright than 97% of the 889 sets that publish a 7-iron
7-iron field: Loft × Lie

The 7-iron of every comparable iron set on record publishing both loft and lie — 889 of them, binned by density.

Specifications by option

What this record publishes. Across 9 options: loft, lie and length on every one.

9 rows, unsorted, collapsed — use the button below the table to show every option.

1936139.25
21461.538.75
2356238.25
26.5662.537.75
3076337.25
34863.536.75
3996436.25
44PW6435.75
49AW6435.5

Head geometry doesn't change with the shaft, so it's stated once. A blank cell means Tour Edge did not publish that figure — we don't estimate.

Measured against comparable clubs

Where this club's published fitting specs sit among comparable clubs — never how good it is.

FigurePublishedAll irons2022Among its peers
Strongest-lofted 7-iron30°=189th of 953=12th of 34=23rd of 120 Tour Edge irons · =36th of 237 mid-handicap irons
Widest loft range30°=552nd of 1,104=15th of 39=142nd of 204 Tour Edge irons · =136th of 237 mid-handicap irons
Most upright lie63°=33rd of 941=6th of 32=1st of 119 Tour Edge irons · =7th of 233 mid-handicap irons
Longest37.3"=49th of 894=2nd of 32=1st of 107 Tour Edge irons · =19th of 227 mid-handicap irons

player level — derived

This iron reads as built for a mid-handicap player — our deterministic reading of 7-iron loft 30° (no offset published). A design classification, not a rule about who may play it. How the bands are read →

Compare this iron →

Or go straight to a comparison: vs Miura CB-801 · vs Callaway Great Big Bertha 23 Iron Set · vs Takomo Iron 101T

More irons

Other Tour Edge irons on record. Irons released in 2022 by other brands, one per brand. Nothing here is a ranking or a recommendation. Browse every club →

What's on this page

In progress2 of 3 built

2 of 3 parts of this club page are built, and we're filling in the rest.

  • Tour Edge's own specs, partly built.Taken from Tour Edge's product page. We haven't found their full spec sheet for this club yet, so some figures they publish may be missing.
  • Published options, built.9 configurations with 3 of the 7 specs an iron can publish.
  • Stock shaft, built.Tour Edge names no stock shaft for this club on the sources we hold, so there's nothing to link.

The site is in beta and the database is still being built, so expect gaps. Know something we don't? Help us fill it in — a link to where it's published is worth more than anything else you could send.

Know something about this club? 8 fields we don't hold — or tell us something here is wrong