Skip to content
Zomma Golf
Menu

Titleist iron

The Titleist T100•S iron is an iron in 9 options from 19°–48°, RH and LH.

Discontinued. Kept here because the published specs still matter to anyone playing one or buying used.

9
options
19–48
loft °
2021
released
Built against the iron fieldpublished figures only
DIFFERENCE FROM THE MEDIAN OF EVERY RECORD WE HOLDLOFTMEDIAN 33.0°32.0° -1LIEMEDIAN 62.5°63.0° +0.5LENGTHMEDIAN 37.00"37.00" 0
Each bar is this club's published figure minus the median of the 1,118 other irons on record that publish it — a median over the records we hold.

View on Titleist →

Where this club lands

The field is every iron in the database that publishes both of the chart's figures — every brand, not just Titleist.

This set's 7-iron is 32° — 60th percentile, weaker-lofted than 60% of the 889 sets that publish one. The median is 32°.

Loft ladder against the field

Loft at each club in the set over the middle half (p25–p75) of every comparable iron set on record — the busiest rung here is built from 900.

Titleist T100•Smiddle half of the field
2030405060123456789PWGW/AWSWLWLOFT (°)Titleist T100•S — 3: 19°Titleist T100•S — 4: 22°Titleist T100•S — 5: 25°Titleist T100•S — 6: 28°Titleist T100•S — 7: 32°Titleist T100•S — 8: 36°Titleist T100•S — 9: 40°Titleist T100•S — PW: 44°Titleist T100•S — W: 48°

A break in the line is a club the set does not publish a loft for — it is never bridged, because joining across a gap would draw a loft the manufacturer never stated. Every brand's name for the gap wedge is pooled into one rung, since only 25 of 917 sets publish two of them.

The head half

Read the set through

Titleist T100•S · 7-iron

LOFT · X AXIS32°
60th percentile — weaker-lofted than 60% of the 889 sets that publish a 7-iron
LIE · Y AXIS63°
97th percentile — more upright than 97% of the 889 sets that publish a 7-iron
7-iron field: Loft × Lie

The 7-iron of every comparable iron set on record publishing both loft and lie — 889 of them, binned by density.

Specifications by option

What this record publishes. Across 9 options: loft, lie and length on every one.

9 rows, unsorted, collapsed — use the button below the table to show every option.

193-ironRH / LH6139
224-ironRH / LH61.538.5
255-ironRH / LH6238
286-ironRH / LH62.537.5
327-ironRH / LH6337
368-ironRH / LH63.536.5
409-ironRH / LH6436
44PWRH / LH6435.75
48WRH / LH6435.5

Head geometry doesn't change with the shaft, so it's stated once. A blank cell means Titleist did not publish that figure — we don't estimate.

Measured against comparable clubs

Where this club's published fitting specs sit among comparable clubs — never how good it is.

FigurePublishedAll irons2021Among its peers
Strongest-lofted 7-iron32°=438th of 953=25th of 36=29th of 124 Titleist irons · =48th of 508 low-handicap irons
Widest loft range29°=629th of 1,104=22nd of 42=64th of 129 Titleist irons · =241st of 508 low-handicap irons
Most upright lie63°=33rd of 941=3rd of 35=1st of 124 Titleist irons · =8th of 505 low-handicap irons
Longest37"=265th of 894=11th of 35=1st of 115 Titleist irons · =83rd of 466 low-handicap irons

player level — derived

This iron reads as built for a low-handicap player — our deterministic reading of 7-iron loft 32° (no offset published). A design classification, not a rule about who may play it. How the bands are read →

Compare this iron →

Or go straight to a comparison: vs New Level 902-OS · vs Ben Hogan Edge EX Irons · vs Tour Edge Exotics C721 Iron Set

More irons

Other Titleist irons on record. Irons released in 2021 by other brands, one per brand. Nothing here is a ranking or a recommendation. Browse every club →

What's on this page

In progress2 of 3 built

2 of 3 parts of this club page are built, and we're filling in the rest.

  • Titleist's own specs, partly built.Taken from Titleist's product page. We haven't found their full spec sheet for this club yet, so some figures they publish may be missing.
  • Published options, built.9 configurations with 3 of the 7 specs an iron can publish.
  • Stock shaft, built.Titleist names no stock shaft for this club on the sources we hold, so there's nothing to link.

The site is in beta and the database is still being built, so expect gaps. Know something we don't? Help us fill it in — a link to where it's published is worth more than anything else you could send.

Know something about this club? 7 fields we don't hold — or tell us something here is wrong