Skip to content
Zomma Golf
Menu

Titleist iron

The Titleist 804.OS Iron Set is an iron in 10 options from 19°–50°.

10
options
19–50
loft °
2004
released
Built against the iron fieldpublished figures only
DIFFERENCE FROM THE MEDIAN OF EVERY RECORD WE HOLDLOFTMEDIAN 33.0°32.0° -1LIEMEDIAN 62.5°62.8° +0.3LENGTHMEDIAN 37.00"37.25" +0.25OFFSETMEDIAN 0.115"0.212" +0.098
Each bar is this club's published figure minus the median of the 1,084 other irons on record that publish it — a median over the records we hold.

Image not published

Where this club lands

The field is every iron in the database that publishes both of the chart's figures — every brand, not just Titleist.

This set's 7-iron is 34° — 86th percentile, weaker-lofted than 86% of the 889 sets that publish one. The median is 32°.

Loft ladder against the field

Loft at each club in the set over the middle half (p25–p75) of every comparable iron set on record — the busiest rung here is built from 900.

Titleist 804.OS Iron Setmiddle half of the field
2030405060123456789PWGW/AWSWLWLOFT (°)Titleist 804.OS Iron Set — 2: 19°Titleist 804.OS Iron Set — 3: 21.5°Titleist 804.OS Iron Set — 4: 24°Titleist 804.OS Iron Set — 5: 27°Titleist 804.OS Iron Set — 6: 30°Titleist 804.OS Iron Set — 7: 34°Titleist 804.OS Iron Set — 8: 38°Titleist 804.OS Iron Set — 9: 42°Titleist 804.OS Iron Set — PW: 46°Titleist 804.OS Iron Set — GW: 50°

A break in the line is a club the set does not publish a loft for — it is never bridged, because joining across a gap would draw a loft the manufacturer never stated. Every brand's name for the gap wedge is pooled into one rung, since only 25 of 917 sets publish two of them.

The head half

Read the set through

Titleist 804.OS Iron Set · 7 Iron

LOFT · X AXIS34°
86th percentile — weaker-lofted than 86% of the 889 sets that publish a 7-iron
LIE · Y AXIS63°
97th percentile — more upright than 97% of the 889 sets that publish a 7-iron
7-iron field: Loft × Lie

The 7-iron of every comparable iron set on record publishing both loft and lie — 889 of them, binned by density.

Offset

Published offset of 0.205 in: the leading edge sits 0.205 in behind the line of the shaft, against a median of 0.12 in for the 7-iron of 580 iron sets on record that publish one.MEDIAN 0.12 inOFFSET 0.205 inSHAFTLEADING EDGE0.25 INLEADING EDGE BEHIND THE SHAFTNOMINAL OUTLINE · SEEN FROM THE TOE · TRUE SCALE

Titleist 804.OS Iron Set · 7 Iron — the leading edge sits behind the line of the shaft by the published figure, drawn to the scale marked and seen from the toe, which is the one view that shows offset truly: it runs perpendicular to the face, so a picture square to the face would have it pointing at you. The outline is a nominal iron — this database holds no head geometry — so the gap the arrow spans is the only measured thing in the frame. The dashed edge is the median of the 7-iron of 580 iron sets on record that publish one.

Offset through the set, against the field

Titleist's published offset at each club, over the middle half (p25–p75) of every comparable set on record that publishes one.

Titleist 804.OS Iron Setmiddle half of the field
0.050.10.150.20.250.323456789PWGW/AWSWLWOFFSET (IN)Titleist 804.OS Iron Set — 2: 0.3 inTitleist 804.OS Iron Set — 3: 0.28 inTitleist 804.OS Iron Set — 4: 0.26 inTitleist 804.OS Iron Set — 5: 0.24 inTitleist 804.OS Iron Set — 6: 0.22 inTitleist 804.OS Iron Set — 7: 0.205 inTitleist 804.OS Iron Set — 8: 0.18 inTitleist 804.OS Iron Set — 9: 0.16 inTitleist 804.OS Iron Set — PW: 0.14 inTitleist 804.OS Iron Set — GW: 0.12 in

A break in the line is a club the set does not publish an offset for — it is never bridged, because joining across a gap would draw an offset the manufacturer never stated. Every brand's name for the gap wedge is pooled into one rung, since only 25 of 917 sets publish two of them.

Specifications by option

What this record publishes. Across 10 options: loft, lie, length and swingweight on every one.

10 rows, unsorted, collapsed — use the button below the table to show every option.

192 Iron590.339.5D2
21.53 Iron600.2839D2
244 Iron610.2638.5D2
275 Iron620.2438D2
306 Iron62.50.2237.5D2
347 Iron630.20537D2
388 Iron63.50.1836.5D2
429 Iron640.1636D2
46PW640.1435.75D2
50GW640.1235.5D2

Head geometry doesn't change with the shaft, so it's stated once. A blank cell means Titleist did not publish that figure — we don't estimate.

Measured against comparable clubs

Where this club's published fitting specs sit among comparable clubs — never how good it is.

FigurePublishedAll irons2004Among its peers
Strongest-lofted 7-iron34°=677th of 953too few comparable clubs to place=52nd of 124 Titleist irons · =224th of 237 mid-handicap irons
Most offset at the 7-iron0.205"=34th of 583too few comparable clubs to place=1st of 85 Titleist irons · =9th of 145 mid-handicap irons
Widest loft range31°=496th of 1,104too few comparable clubs to place=46th of 129 Titleist irons · =122nd of 237 mid-handicap irons
Most upright lie63°=33rd of 941too few comparable clubs to place=1st of 124 Titleist irons · =7th of 233 mid-handicap irons
Longest37"=265th of 894too few comparable clubs to place=1st of 115 Titleist irons · =74th of 227 mid-handicap irons

player level — derived

This iron reads as built for a mid-handicap player — our deterministic reading of 7-iron offset 0.205", 7-iron loft 34° (traditional players loft). A design classification, not a rule about who may play it. How the bands are read →

Compare this iron →

Or go straight to a comparison: vs TaylorMade R7 XD Iron Set · vs Cleveland CG1 Tour Iron Set · vs Cobra S3 Irons

More irons

Other Titleist irons on record. Nothing here is a ranking or a recommendation. Browse every club →

What's on this page

In progress2 of 3 built

2 of 3 parts of this club page are built, and we're filling in the rest.

  • Titleist's own specs, not built yet.We haven't found Titleist's own page for this club yet — everything here comes from the sources listed at the foot of the page.
  • Published options, built.10 configurations with 5 of the 7 specs an iron can publish.
  • Stock shaft, built.Titleist names no stock shaft for this club on the sources we hold, so there's nothing to link.

The site is in beta and the database is still being built, so expect gaps. Know something we don't? Help us fill it in — a link to where it's published is worth more than anything else you could send.

Know something about this club? 8 fields we don't hold — or tell us something here is wrong