Skip to content
Zomma Golf
Menu

Titleist iron

The Titleist Forged 735.CM iron is an iron in 9 options from 19°–47°.

9
options
19–47
loft °
2005
released
Built against the iron fieldpublished figures only
DIFFERENCE FROM THE MEDIAN OF EVERY RECORD WE HOLDLOFTMEDIAN 33.0°31.0° -2LIEMEDIAN 62.5°62.5° 0LENGTHMEDIAN 37.00"37.50" +0.5OFFSETMEDIAN 0.115"0.110" -0.005
Each bar is this club's published figure minus the median of the 1,084 other irons on record that publish it — a median over the records we hold.

View on Titleist →

Where this club lands

The field is every iron in the database that publishes both of the chart's figures — every brand, not just Titleist.

This set's 7-iron is 35° — 95th percentile, weaker-lofted than 95% of the 889 sets that publish one. The median is 32°.

Loft ladder against the field

Loft at each club in the set over the middle half (p25–p75) of every comparable iron set on record — the busiest rung here is built from 900.

Titleist Forged 735.CMmiddle half of the field
2030405060123456789PWGW/AWSWLWLOFT (°)Titleist Forged 735.CM — 2: 19°Titleist Forged 735.CM — 3: 22°Titleist Forged 735.CM — 4: 25°Titleist Forged 735.CM — 5: 28°Titleist Forged 735.CM — 6: 31°Titleist Forged 735.CM — 7: 35°Titleist Forged 735.CM — 8: 39°Titleist Forged 735.CM — 9: 43°Titleist Forged 735.CM — P: 47°

A break in the line is a club the set does not publish a loft for — it is never bridged, because joining across a gap would draw a loft the manufacturer never stated. Every brand's name for the gap wedge is pooled into one rung, since only 25 of 917 sets publish two of them.

The head half

Read the set through

Titleist Forged 735.CM · 7 Iron

LOFT · X AXIS35°
95th percentile — weaker-lofted than 95% of the 889 sets that publish a 7-iron
LIE · Y AXIS63°
97th percentile — more upright than 97% of the 889 sets that publish a 7-iron
7-iron field: Loft × Lie

The 7-iron of every comparable iron set on record publishing both loft and lie — 889 of them, binned by density.

Offset

Published offset of 0.1 in: the leading edge sits 0.1 in behind the line of the shaft, against a median of 0.12 in for the 7-iron of 580 iron sets on record that publish one.MEDIAN 0.12 inOFFSET 0.1 inSHAFTLEADING EDGE0.25 INLEADING EDGE BEHIND THE SHAFTNOMINAL OUTLINE · SEEN FROM THE TOE · TRUE SCALE

Titleist Forged 735.CM · 7 Iron — the leading edge sits behind the line of the shaft by the published figure, drawn to the scale marked and seen from the toe, which is the one view that shows offset truly: it runs perpendicular to the face, so a picture square to the face would have it pointing at you. The outline is a nominal iron — this database holds no head geometry — so the gap the arrow spans is the only measured thing in the frame. The dashed edge is the median of the 7-iron of 580 iron sets on record that publish one.

Offset through the set, against the field

Titleist's published offset at each club, over the middle half (p25–p75) of every comparable set on record that publishes one.

Titleist Forged 735.CMmiddle half of the field
0.050.10.150.223456789PWGW/AWSWLWOFFSET (IN)Titleist Forged 735.CM — 2: 0.15 inTitleist Forged 735.CM — 3: 0.14 inTitleist Forged 735.CM — 4: 0.13 inTitleist Forged 735.CM — 5: 0.12 inTitleist Forged 735.CM — 6: 0.11 inTitleist Forged 735.CM — 7: 0.1 inTitleist Forged 735.CM — 8: 0.095 inTitleist Forged 735.CM — 9: 0.09 inTitleist Forged 735.CM — P: 0.085 in

A break in the line is a club the set does not publish an offset for — it is never bridged, because joining across a gap would draw an offset the manufacturer never stated. Every brand's name for the gap wedge is pooled into one rung, since only 25 of 917 sets publish two of them.

Specifications by option

What this record publishes. Across 9 options: loft, lie and length on every one.

9 rows, unsorted, collapsed — use the button below the table to show every option.

192 Iron590.15039.5
223 Iron600.14139
254 Iron610.13238.5
285 Iron620.12338
316 Iron62.50.11437.5
357 Iron630.1537
398 Iron63.50.095636.5
439 Iron640.09736
47P640.085835.75

Head geometry doesn't change with the shaft, so it's stated once. A blank cell means Titleist did not publish that figure — we don't estimate.

Measured against comparable clubs

Where this club's published fitting specs sit among comparable clubs — never how good it is.

FigurePublishedAll irons2005Among its peers
Strongest-lofted 7-iron35°=838th of 953too few comparable clubs to place=63rd of 124 Titleist irons · =396th of 508 low-handicap irons
Most offset at the 7-iron0.1"=395th of 583too few comparable clubs to place=51st of 85 Titleist irons · =95th of 283 low-handicap irons
Widest loft range28°=719th of 1,104too few comparable clubs to place=99th of 129 Titleist irons · =304th of 508 low-handicap irons
Most upright lie63°=33rd of 941too few comparable clubs to place=1st of 124 Titleist irons · =8th of 505 low-handicap irons
Longest37"=265th of 894too few comparable clubs to place=1st of 115 Titleist irons · =83rd of 466 low-handicap irons

player level — derived

This iron reads as built for a low-handicap player — our deterministic reading of 7-iron offset 0.1", 7-iron loft 35°. A design classification, not a rule about who may play it. How the bands are read →

Compare this iron →

Or go straight to a comparison: vs TaylorMade R7 XD Iron Set · vs Cleveland CG1 Tour Iron Set · vs Cobra S3 Irons

More irons

Other Titleist irons on record. Irons released in 2005 by other brands, one per brand. Nothing here is a ranking or a recommendation. Browse every club →

What's on this page

In progress2 of 3 built

2 of 3 parts of this club page are built, and we're filling in the rest.

  • Titleist's own specs, partly built.Taken from Titleist's product page. We haven't found their full spec sheet for this club yet, so some figures they publish may be missing.
  • Published options, built.9 configurations with 5 of the 7 specs an iron can publish.
  • Stock shaft, built.Titleist names no stock shaft for this club on the sources we hold, so there's nothing to link.

The site is in beta and the database is still being built, so expect gaps. Know something we don't? Help us fill it in — a link to where it's published is worth more than anything else you could send.

Know something about this club? 7 fields we don't hold — or tell us something here is wrong