Skip to content
Zomma Golf
Menu

Mizuno iron

The Mizuno Mizuno Pro 225 iron is an iron in 10 options from 16.5°–49°, RH.

Discontinued. Kept here because the published specs still matter to anyone playing one or buying used.

10
options
16.5–49
loft °
2022
released
Built against the iron fieldpublished figures only
DIFFERENCE FROM THE MEDIAN OF EVERY RECORD WE HOLDLOFTMEDIAN 33.0°28.5° -4.5LIEMEDIAN 62.5°61.3° -1.3LENGTHMEDIAN 37.00"37.25" +0.25OFFSETMEDIAN 0.115"0.126" +0.011
Each bar is this club's published figure minus the median of the 1,084 other irons on record that publish it — a median over the records we hold.

View on Mizuno →

Where this club lands

The field is every iron in the database that publishes both of the chart's figures — every brand, not just Mizuno.

This set's 7-iron is 30° — 31st percentile, stronger-lofted than 69% of the 889 sets that publish one. The median is 32°.

Loft ladder against the field

Loft at each club in the set over the middle half (p25–p75) of every comparable iron set on record — the busiest rung here is built from 900.

Mizuno Mizuno Pro 225middle half of the field
2030405060123456789PWGW/AWSWLWLOFT (°)Mizuno Mizuno Pro 225 — 2: 16.5°Mizuno Mizuno Pro 225 — 3: 19°Mizuno Mizuno Pro 225 — 4: 21.5°Mizuno Mizuno Pro 225 — 5: 24°Mizuno Mizuno Pro 225 — 6: 27°Mizuno Mizuno Pro 225 — 7: 30°Mizuno Mizuno Pro 225 — 8: 34°Mizuno Mizuno Pro 225 — 9: 39°Mizuno Mizuno Pro 225 — PW: 44°Mizuno Mizuno Pro 225 — GW: 49°

A break in the line is a club the set does not publish a loft for — it is never bridged, because joining across a gap would draw a loft the manufacturer never stated. Every brand's name for the gap wedge is pooled into one rung, since only 25 of 917 sets publish two of them.

The head half

Read the set through

Mizuno Mizuno Pro 225 · 7-iron

LOFT · X AXIS30°
31st percentile — stronger-lofted than 69% of the 889 sets that publish a 7-iron
LIE · Y AXIS61.5°
11th percentile — flatter than 89% of the 889 sets that publish a 7-iron
7-iron field: Loft × Lie

The 7-iron of every comparable iron set on record publishing both loft and lie — 889 of them, binned by density.

Offset

Published offset of 0.122 in: the leading edge sits 0.122 in behind the line of the shaft, against a median of 0.12 in for the 7-iron of 580 iron sets on record that publish one.MEDIAN 0.12 inOFFSET 0.122 inSHAFTLEADING EDGE0.25 INLEADING EDGE BEHIND THE SHAFTNOMINAL OUTLINE · SEEN FROM THE TOE · TRUE SCALE

Mizuno Mizuno Pro 225 · 7-iron — the leading edge sits behind the line of the shaft by the published figure, drawn to the scale marked and seen from the toe, which is the one view that shows offset truly: it runs perpendicular to the face, so a picture square to the face would have it pointing at you. The outline is a nominal iron — this database holds no head geometry — so the gap the arrow spans is the only measured thing in the frame. The dashed edge is the median of the 7-iron of 580 iron sets on record that publish one.

Offset through the set, against the field

Mizuno's published offset at each club, over the middle half (p25–p75) of every comparable set on record that publishes one.

Mizuno Mizuno Pro 225middle half of the field
0.050.10.150.223456789PWGW/AWSWLWOFFSET (IN)Mizuno Mizuno Pro 225 — 2: 0.15 inMizuno Mizuno Pro 225 — 3: 0.142 inMizuno Mizuno Pro 225 — 4: 0.138 inMizuno Mizuno Pro 225 — 5: 0.134 inMizuno Mizuno Pro 225 — 6: 0.13 inMizuno Mizuno Pro 225 — 7: 0.122 inMizuno Mizuno Pro 225 — 8: 0.114 inMizuno Mizuno Pro 225 — 9: 0.106 inMizuno Mizuno Pro 225 — PW: 0.098 inMizuno Mizuno Pro 225 — GW: 0.094 in

A break in the line is a club the set does not publish an offset for — it is never bridged, because joining across a gap would draw an offset the manufacturer never stated. Every brand's name for the gap wedge is pooled into one rung, since only 25 of 917 sets publish two of them.

Specifications by option

What this record publishes. Across 10 options: loft, lie and length on every one.

10 rows, unsorted, collapsed — use the button below the table to show every option.

16.52-iron590.1539.5
193-iron59.50.14239
21.54-iron600.13838.5
245-iron60.50.13438
276-iron610.1337.5
307-iron61.50.12237
348-iron620.11436.5
399-iron62.50.10636
44PW630.09835.5
49GW630.09435.25

Head geometry doesn't change with the shaft, so it's stated once. A blank cell means Mizuno did not publish that figure — we don't estimate.

Measured against comparable clubs

Where this club's published fitting specs sit among comparable clubs — never how good it is.

FigurePublishedAll irons2022Among its peers
Strongest-lofted 7-iron30°=189th of 953=12th of 34=12th of 69 Mizuno irons · =36th of 237 mid-handicap irons
Most offset at the 7-iron0.122"=272nd of 583=9th of 25=23rd of 48 Mizuno irons · =110th of 145 mid-handicap irons
Widest loft range32.5°=460th of 1,10412th of 3910th of 71 Mizuno irons · 110th of 237 mid-handicap irons
Most upright lie61.5°=835th of 941=28th of 32=17th of 69 Mizuno irons · =211th of 233 mid-handicap irons
Longest37"=265th of 894=10th of 32=21st of 69 Mizuno irons · =74th of 227 mid-handicap irons

player level — derived

This iron reads as built for a mid-handicap player — our deterministic reading of 7-iron offset 0.122", 7-iron loft 30°. A design classification, not a rule about who may play it. How the bands are read →

Compare this iron →

Or go straight to a comparison: vs Miura CB-801 · vs Tour Edge Exotics C722 Irons · vs Callaway Great Big Bertha 23 Iron Set

More irons

Other Mizuno irons on record. Irons released in 2022 by other brands, one per brand. Nothing here is a ranking or a recommendation. Browse every club →

What's on this page

In progress2 of 3 built

2 of 3 parts of this club page are built, and we're filling in the rest.

  • Mizuno's own specs, partly built.Taken from Mizuno's product page. We haven't found their full spec sheet for this club yet, so some figures they publish may be missing.
  • Published options, built.10 configurations with 4 of the 7 specs an iron can publish.
  • Stock shaft, built.Mizuno names no stock shaft for this club on the sources we hold, so there's nothing to link.

The site is in beta and the database is still being built, so expect gaps. Know something we don't? Help us fill it in — a link to where it's published is worth more than anything else you could send.

Know something about this club? 6 fields we don't hold — or tell us something here is wrong