Cleveland fairway
Discontinued. Kept here because the published specs still matter to anyone playing one or buying used.
Two separate readings, because a club is two products. Each field is every fairway in the database that publishes both of that chart's figures — every brand, not just Cleveland.
Across every option: this club's loft from the 31st to the 83rd percentile, and length from the 36th to the 83rd percentile.
The cloud is every fairway head option on record that publishes both loft and length — 1,546 of them, binned by density.
Across every build: this club's stock shafts run weight from the 45th to the 51st percentile, and torque at the 43rd percentile.
The cloud is every fairway shaft variant on record that publishes both weight and torque — 1,748 of them, binned by density.
What this record publishes. Across 6 options: loft and lie on every one; length on 3 of 6 and swingweight on 3 of 6.
6 rows, unsorted.
| 15 | 3-wood (15°) | RH / LH | 57.5 | 43.125 | D1 |
| 18 | 5-wood (18°) | RH / LH | 58 | 42.625 | D1 |
| 21 | 7-wood (21°) | RH / LH | 58.5 | 42.125 | D1 |
| 15 | 3W | RH / LH | 57.5 | not published | not published |
| 18 | 5W | RH / LH | 58 | not published | not published |
| 21 | 7W | RH / LH | 58.5 | not published | not published |
Head geometry doesn't change with the shaft, so it's stated once. A blank cell means Cleveland did not publish that figure — we don't estimate.
Every shaft Cleveland lists as stock for this club, each with its own flexes, weight and torque. Open one for its full loft × flex build table.
12 rows, unsorted.
| 15 | 3W | R | RH / LH | 60 | 3.5 | 57.5 | not published | not published |
| 15 | 3-wood (15°) | R | RH / LH | 60 | 3.5 | 57.5 | 43.125 | D1 |
| 15 | 3W | S | RH / LH | 63 | 3.5 | 57.5 | not published | not published |
| 15 | 3-wood (15°) | S | RH / LH | 63 | 3.5 | 57.5 | 43.125 | D1 |
| 18 | 5W | R | RH / LH | 60 | 3.5 | 58 | not published | not published |
| 18 | 5-wood (18°) | R | RH / LH | 60 | 3.5 | 58 | 42.625 | D1 |
| 18 | 5W | S | RH / LH | 63 | 3.5 | 58 | not published | not published |
| 18 | 5-wood (18°) | S | RH / LH | 63 | 3.5 | 58 | 42.625 | D1 |
| 21 | 7W | R | RH / LH | 60 | 3.5 | 58.5 | not published | not published |
| 21 | 7-wood (21°) | R | RH / LH | 60 | 3.5 | 58.5 | 42.125 | D1 |
| 21 | 7W | S | RH / LH | 63 | 3.5 | 58.5 | not published | not published |
| 21 | 7-wood (21°) | S | RH / LH | 63 | 3.5 | 58.5 | 42.125 | D1 |
Made-for means a version built for this club, not the aftermarket shaft of the same name — a different product with different specs. We keep them as separate records and never blur the two.
Where this club's published fitting specs sit among comparable clubs — never how good it is.
| Figure | Published | All fairway woods | 2021 | Among its peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lowest published loft | 15° | =182nd of 548 | =11th of 17 | =6th of 17 Cleveland fairway woods · =12th of 126 high-handicap fairway woods |
| Widest loft range | 6° | =256th of 531 | =11th of 16 | =8th of 16 Cleveland fairway woods · =86th of 126 high-handicap fairway woods |
| Most upright lie | 58.5° | =305th of 500 | too few comparable clubs to place | =9th of 14 Cleveland fairway woods · =98th of 117 high-handicap fairway woods |
| Longest | 43.1" | =202nd of 551 | 4th of 12 | =5th of 17 Cleveland fairway woods · =49th of 123 high-handicap fairway woods |
This fairway reads as built for a high-handicap player — our deterministic reading of manufacturer designation "xl", "halo" (forgiveness / draw / lightweight line). A design classification, not a rule about who may play it. How the bands are read →
Or go straight to a comparison: vs TaylorMade SIM2 Max Fairway · vs Callaway Big Bertha B21 Fairway Woods · vs Tour Edge Exotics C722 Fairway
Other Cleveland fairways on record. Fairways released in 2021 by other brands, one per brand. Nothing here is a ranking or a recommendation. Browse every club →
2 of 3 parts of this club page are built, and we're filling in the rest.
The site is in beta and the database is still being built, so expect gaps. Know something we don't? Help us fill it in — a link to where it's published is worth more than anything else you could send.