Skip to content
Zomma Golf
Menu

Callaway iron

The Callaway Paradym Star Iron Set is an iron in 8 options from 24°–56°, RH.

8
options
24–56
loft °
2023
released (est.)
Built against the iron fieldpublished figures only
DIFFERENCE FROM THE MEDIAN OF EVERY RECORD WE HOLDLOFTMEDIAN 33.0°37.5° +4.5LIEMEDIAN 62.5°62.8° +0.3LENGTHMEDIAN 37.00"36.50" -0.5OFFSETMEDIAN 0.115"0.140" +0.025
Each bar is this club's published figure minus the median of the 1,084 other irons on record that publish it — a median over the records we hold.

Image not published

Where this club lands

The field is every iron in the database that publishes both of the chart's figures — every brand, not just Callaway.

This set's 7-iron is 30° — 31st percentile, stronger-lofted than 69% of the 889 sets that publish one. The median is 32°.

Loft ladder against the field

Loft at each club in the set over the middle half (p25–p75) of every comparable iron set on record — the busiest rung here is built from 900.

Callaway Paradym Star Iron Setmiddle half of the field
2030405060123456789PWGW/AWSWLWLOFT (°)Callaway Paradym Star Iron Set — 5: 24°Callaway Paradym Star Iron Set — 6: 26°Callaway Paradym Star Iron Set — 7: 30°Callaway Paradym Star Iron Set — 8: 35°Callaway Paradym Star Iron Set — 9: 40°Callaway Paradym Star Iron Set — PW: 45°Callaway Paradym Star Iron Set — AW: 50°Callaway Paradym Star Iron Set — SW: 56°

A break in the line is a club the set does not publish a loft for — it is never bridged, because joining across a gap would draw a loft the manufacturer never stated. Every brand's name for the gap wedge is pooled into one rung, since only 25 of 917 sets publish two of them.

The head half

Read the set through

Callaway Paradym Star Iron Set · 7

LOFT · X AXIS30°
31st percentile — stronger-lofted than 69% of the 889 sets that publish a 7-iron
LIE · Y AXIS62°
44th percentile — flatter than 56% of the 889 sets that publish a 7-iron
7-iron field: Loft × Lie

The 7-iron of every comparable iron set on record publishing both loft and lie — 889 of them, binned by density.

Offset

Published offset of 0.165 in (published as 4.2 mm): the leading edge sits 0.165 in behind the line of the shaft, against a median of 0.12 in for the 7-iron of 580 iron sets on record that publish one.MEDIAN 0.12 inOFFSET 0.165 in · 4.2 mm as publishedSHAFTLEADING EDGE0.25 INLEADING EDGE BEHIND THE SHAFTNOMINAL OUTLINE · SEEN FROM THE TOE · TRUE SCALE

Callaway Paradym Star Iron Set · 7 — the leading edge sits behind the line of the shaft by the published figure, drawn to the scale marked and seen from the toe, which is the one view that shows offset truly: it runs perpendicular to the face, so a picture square to the face would have it pointing at you. The outline is a nominal iron — this database holds no head geometry — so the gap the arrow spans is the only measured thing in the frame. The dashed edge is the median of the 7-iron of 580 iron sets on record that publish one.

Offset through the set, against the field

Callaway's published offset at each club, over the middle half (p25–p75) of every comparable set on record that publishes one.

Callaway Paradym Star Iron Setmiddle half of the field
0.050.10.150.223456789PWGW/AWSWLWOFFSET (IN)Callaway Paradym Star Iron Set — 5: 0.189 inCallaway Paradym Star Iron Set — 6: 0.177 inCallaway Paradym Star Iron Set — 7: 0.165 inCallaway Paradym Star Iron Set — 8: 0.15 inCallaway Paradym Star Iron Set — 9: 0.13 inCallaway Paradym Star Iron Set — PW: 0.106 inCallaway Paradym Star Iron Set — AW: 0.087 inCallaway Paradym Star Iron Set — SW: 0.067 in

A break in the line is a club the set does not publish an offset for — it is never bridged, because joining across a gap would draw an offset the manufacturer never stated. Every brand's name for the gap wedge is pooled into one rung, since only 25 of 917 sets publish two of them.

Specifications by option

What this record publishes. Across 8 options: loft, lie, length and swingweight on every one.

8 rows, unsorted.

245610.18938.25D1
26661.50.17737.75D1
307620.16537.25D1
35862.50.1536.75D1
409630.1336.25D1
45PW63.50.10635.75D1
50AW640.08735.25D1
56SW640.06735D1

Head geometry doesn't change with the shaft, so it's stated once. A blank cell means Callaway did not publish that figure — we don't estimate.

Callaway publishes offset in millimetres; the offset (in) column is that figure converted, and the record keeps Callaway's own figure verbatim.

Measured against comparable clubs

Where this club's published fitting specs sit among comparable clubs — never how good it is.

FigurePublishedAll irons2023Among its peers
Strongest-lofted 7-iron30°=189th of 953=18th of 35=28th of 121 Callaway irons · =147th of 208 high-handicap irons
Most offset at the 7-iron0.165"=104th of 5838th of 2321st of 74 Callaway irons · =84th of 155 high-handicap irons
Widest loft range32°=462nd of 1,104=15th of 42=73rd of 125 Callaway irons · =150th of 208 high-handicap irons
Most upright lie62°=539th of 941=17th of 34=69th of 121 Callaway irons · =119th of 203 high-handicap irons
Longest37.3"=49th of 894=1st of 34=12th of 112 Callaway irons · =24th of 201 high-handicap irons

player level — derived

This iron reads as built for a high-handicap player — our deterministic reading of 7-iron offset 0.165", 7-iron loft 30°. A design classification, not a rule about who may play it. How the bands are read →

Compare this iron →

Or go straight to a comparison: vs Cobra Aerojet Iron Set · vs Miura CB-302 · vs Srixon Z-Forged II Irons

More irons

Other Callaway irons on record. Irons released in 2023 by other brands, one per brand. Nothing here is a ranking or a recommendation. Browse every club →

What's on this page

In progress2 of 3 built

2 of 3 parts of this club page are built, and we're filling in the rest.

  • Callaway's own specs, not built yet.We haven't found Callaway's own page for this club yet — everything here comes from the sources listed at the foot of the page.
  • Published options, built.8 configurations with 5 of the 7 specs an iron can publish.
  • Stock shaft, built.Callaway names no stock shaft for this club on the sources we hold, so there's nothing to link.

The site is in beta and the database is still being built, so expect gaps. Know something we don't? Help us fill it in — a link to where it's published is worth more than anything else you could send.

Know something about this club? 7 fields we don't hold — or tell us something here is wrong