Skip to content
Zomma Golf
Menu

Fujikura shaft

The Fujikura Vista Tour 70 is a shaft in 3 flexes — it weighs 87–101 g with 3.5° torque and a high kick point.

Weight and torque, one panel eachpublished figures only
WEIGHT · GRAMS · 87g–101g101g92g87gRSXTORQUE · DEGREES · 3.5°–3.5°3.5°3.5°3.5°RSX
Published weight and torque for all 3 options, on two separate scales — grams and degrees share none.

View on Fujikura →

Compare this shaft →

How this shaft reads against the database

WEIGHT AND TORQUE

This record carries no club category, so there is no peer field to place it in.

Flex
Launch and spin, as published

Fujikura rates this shaft low launch and low spin — the shading is how many of the 0 rated shafts on record share each square.

LOWMIDHIGHLOWMIDHIGHSPINLAUNCHFujikura Vista Tour 70: low launch, low spin (as published)
STIFFNESS BY SECTION

Neither Fujikura nor our derived profile has a stiffness reading for the butt, mid and tip of this shaft. Nothing here is estimated, so there is nothing to draw.

Specifications by flex

What this record publishes. Across 3 flex options: weight, torque, tip diameter, launch rating, spin rating and kick point on every one.

3 rows, unsorted.

R1013.50.3350.646highlowlow73
S923.50.3350.646highlowlow74
X873.50.3350.646highlowlow75

What's on this page

In progress2 of 3 built

2 of 3 parts of this shaft page are built, and we're filling in the rest.

  • Fujikura's own specs, partly built.Taken from Fujikura's product page. We haven't found their full spec sheet for this shaft yet, so some figures they publish may be missing.
  • Flex options, built.3 flexes, each with a published weight.
  • Launch, spin and torque, built.Published for every flex — the figures a fitter compares shafts on.

The site is in beta and the database is still being built, so expect gaps. Know something we don't? Help us fill it in — a link to where it's published is worth more than anything else you could send.

Know something about this shaft? 2 fields we don't hold — or tell us something here is wrong