Fujikura shaft
The Fujikura Motore Speeder 569 is a shaft in 3 flexes — it weighs 55.5–59 g with 3.6–4° torque and a mid kick point.
Weight and torque, one panel eachpublished figures only
How this shaft reads against the database
WEIGHT AND TORQUE
This record carries no club category, so there is no peer field to place it in.
Flex
LAUNCH AND SPIN
Fujikura does not publish a launch or spin rating for this shaft. We do not infer one — a kick point is a related measurement, not the same measurement.
Stiffness by section
Where this shaft is stiff and where it gives — bands DERIVED by ranking each section against the maker's own shafts of the same type and weight.
A hatched section is one with no published rating — it is drawn as unknown rather than shaded at a middle value. Derived profiles carry no mid-section reading at all, because the numbers they are ranked from describe only the tip and the butt.
Specifications by flex
What this record publishes. Across 3 flex options: weight, torque, tip diameter, launch rating, spin rating and kick point on every one.
3 rows, unsorted.
| R2 | 55.5 | 4 | 0.335 | 0.6 | 47 | 2.5 | 130 | 95 | mid | M/H | mid | firm | not published | firm |
| R | 57 | 3.6 | 0.335 | 0.6 | 47 | 2.5 | 120 | 90 | mid | M/H | mid | mid | not published | mid+ |
| S | 59 | 3.6 | 0.335 | 0.6 | 47 | 2.5 | 115 | 80 | mid | M/H | mid | soft | not published | mid |
Flex profile is estimated — ranked from Fujikura's tip/butt-flex figures within similar shafts (approximate); the raw numbers are in the table.
What's on this page
In progress2 of 3 built
2 of 3 parts of this shaft page are built, and we're filling in the rest.
- Fujikura's own specs, partly built.Taken from Fujikura's product page. We haven't found their full spec sheet for this shaft yet, so some figures they publish may be missing.
- Flex options, built.3 flexes, each with a published weight.
- Launch, spin and torque, built.Published for every flex — the figures a fitter compares shafts on.
The site is in beta and the database is still being built, so expect gaps. Know something we don't? Help us fill it in — a link to where it's published is worth more than anything else you could send.