Skip to content
Zomma Golf
Menu

Petrifying Springs Golf Course is an 18-hole public course in Kenosha, Wisconsin.

Designed by Joseph A. Roseman. It plays 6,019 yards from the White tees, rated 67.8/119 (checked 2026-08-15).

Create a free account to save Petrifying Springs Golf Course to My Game, where every course you save is measured against the rest of its state on the figures it publishes.

18
holes
70
par
6,019
yards (tips)
119
slope (white)
The shape of the round · White teespublished figures only
HOLE ORDER — WHITE TEES336272383167268329354492476304350152417367307189419437142334435464748595104114123134144154163174184PAROUT 3,077 YDSIN 2,942 YDSFIRST NINESECOND NINE
The published card in playing order, 18 holes with the two nines split — hole number under each bar, its par below that.

The course

designer
Joseph A. Roseman reported
access
public
address
4909 7th Street, Kenosha, WI, 53144
phone
262-697-4653
elevation
710 ft derived
opened
1978
on site
restaurant · lessons

42.65036, -87.86723 — open on OpenStreetMap →

The course, from above

This map shows all 18 holes. 3 mapped features sit close to more than one hole and are drawn with the nearer one.

126 traced features across 8 layers for Petrifying Springs Golf Course, drawn over NAIP 2022 aerial imagery.

Use arrow keys to pan, plus and minus to zoom. Tab reaches the map controls.

126 traced features across 8 layers for Petrifying Springs Golf Course, drawn over NAIP 2022 aerial imagery. The map itself needs JavaScript; the geometry is a plain GeoJSON file either way.

18
Holes
20
Fairways
8
Bunkers
1
Water
18
Greens
37
Tee pads
6,019yds
White tees
492yds
Longest hole
152yds
Shortest hole

Imported from OpenStreetMap, edges unchecked · USDA NAIP 2022-06-23

Tees & ratings

Ratingsopen datachecked 2026-08-15

All 2 tee sets par, yardage, course rating, slope — the full table

Sorted by Yards, descending. 2 rows.

WhiteM70601967.811930772942
OrangeF72contested705287contested502470.912225602464

Every figure as published except Card par (derived) and Card yards (derived), which are summed from the card below and shown only where a published figure is contested; a blank cell elsewhere is one nobody publishes. Front 9 and Back 9 are summed from the per-hole yardages on the scorecard.

The Orange tees publish a par the scorecard below does not add up to. Both figures are published and nothing we hold settles which one a round plays to, so the Par column keeps the published figure, marked contested, and each tee's own par row from the card below is summed beside it, marked derived.

The Orange tees publish a yardage total the scorecard below does not add up to. Both figures are published and nothing we hold settles which one a round plays to, so the Yards column keeps the published figure, marked contested, and each tee's own yardage row from the card below is summed beside it, marked derived.

Scorecard — every published tee

Scorecardopen datachecked 2026-08-15

Hole 123456789101112131415161718 Total
Par 434344455443444344 70
White 336272383167268329354492476304350152417367307189419437 6,019
Orange 323154258152242269327429406288318136306306276138360336 5,287
Handicap 513915171171312101881416642

Plan it in the Studio

Plan Petrifying Springs Golf Course hole by hole, for your game.

Ask in plain words. The Studio draws each hole on the aerial photo, picks a club for each shot from your carries and the way you miss, and shows where a miss costs you strokes. Where a green was surveyed, it reads the slope too.

  • The approach, planned A Studio approach map on the aerial photo: a lob wedge aimed at the island green, its spread drawn as a dashed ring over the water, and the side it most often misses. Example from another course: hole 15, Resort tee, Stadium Course at TPC Scottsdale
  • The green, from LiDAR A Studio green view on the aerial photo: arrows for the slope a LiDAR survey measured, the area a cup could be cut, and the safer side to miss. Example from another course: hole 15, Stadium Course at TPC Scottsdale
  • Every shot, tee to green A Studio plan on the aerial photo of a desert par 4: the driver off the tee and a 7-iron into the green between the bunkers, each shot with its landing spread drawn as a dashed ring. Example from another course: hole 2, Resort tee, Stadium Course at TPC Scottsdale

Plan this course in the Studio

Pictures: Studio output for a sample golfer, drawn 2026-10-15. The Studio needs a free account. AI can make mistakes.

© OpenStreetMap contributors

Book a tee time

Rates change by day and by season, so we send you to Petrifying Springs Golf Course's own booking page rather than quoting a figure that was true the week we captured it.

Check tee times and rates

Also bookable nearby: Maplecrest Country Club (3.3 mi) · Pleasant View Golf Course (6.8 mi) · Ives Grove Golf Links (7.0 mi)

Measured against comparable courses

How hard and how long this course plays against comparable courses — never how good it is.

FigureThis courseIn WisconsinNationwideAmong its peers
Longest6,019 yds220th of 337=8,416th of 12,025231st of 305 in the Chicago-Naperville, IL-IN-WI combined area · =2,444th of 4,105 public courses · =4,457th of 7,004 courses you can book · =8,339th of 9,017 18-hole regulation courses
Toughest testslope 119=160th of 225=6,765th of 8,710=217th of 264 in the Chicago-Naperville, IL-IN-WI combined area · =1,901st of 2,882 public courses · =3,506th of 4,936 courses you can book · =6,320th of 7,089 18-hole regulation courses
Hardest from the tipsrating 67.8178th of 210=7,039th of 7,615=219th of 233 in the Chicago-Naperville, IL-IN-WI combined area · =2,135th of 2,412 public courses · =3,757th of 4,145 courses you can book · =6,840th of 7,034 18-hole regulation courses
Widest tee spread732 yds between tees240th of 316=9,335th of 11,523=246th of 292 in the Chicago-Naperville, IL-IN-WI combined area · 2,899th of 3,841 public courses · =5,152nd of 6,653 courses you can book · 8,653rd of 8,962 18-hole regulation courses
Oldestopened 1978=154th of 258=5,298th of 9,368=126th of 196 in the Chicago-Naperville, IL-IN-WI combined area · =1,639th of 3,277 public courses · =2,873rd of 5,526 courses you can book · =3,760th of 7,001 18-hole regulation courses
Highest above sea level710 ft derived =312th of 355=5,643rd of 12,437122nd of 319 in the Chicago-Naperville, IL-IN-WI combined area · =2,246th of 4,289 public courses · =3,681st of 7,274 courses you can book · =3,989th of 9,106 18-hole regulation courses

What's on this page

In progress4 of 6 built

4 of 6 parts of this course page are built, and we're filling in the rest.

  • Scorecard, built.Par and yardage for every hole, from 2 sets of tees.
  • Course rating and slope, built.Rated from 2 sets of tees.
  • Course map, built.All 18 greens drawn, with the fairways, bunkers and water, over aerial imagery.
  • Per-hole distances, built.Every hole is traced, so carries and distances to the front, middle and back of each green are measured along the line you actually play.
  • Green contours, not built yet.We haven't built the green contours for this course yet.
  • Course details, partly built.6 of 7 background details — we don't hold the grass on the greens.

The site is in beta and the database is still being built, so expect gaps. Know something we don't? Help us fill it in — a link to where it's published is worth more than anything else you could send.

Sources

Gathered from the course's own site and public records — every figure on this page is traceable to who published it and when. Spot an error or a gap? Tell us.

Location and identity seeded from OpenStreetMap — © OpenStreetMap contributors, ODbL. Last checked 2026-08-15. Where each figure came from is stated beside it, above.

Compare this course →

Or go straight to a comparison: vs Kenosha Country Club · vs Maplecrest Country Club · vs Washington Park Municipal Golf Course

Nearby courses

Straight-line distance from this course's coordinates, within 60 miles — not driving distance, and it crosses state lines where the nearest courses are over one.

Know something about this course? 7 fields we don't hold — or tell us something here is wrong