Skip to content
Zomma Golf
Menu

Charwood Country Club is an 18-hole semi-private golf course in West Columbia, South Carolina.

It plays 6,365 yards from the Black tees, rated 69.6/128 (checked 2026-08-14).

Create a free account to save Charwood Country Club to My Game, where every course you save is measured against the rest of its state on the figures it publishes.

18
holes
71
par
6,365
yards (tips)
128
slope (black)
The shape of the round · Black teespublished figures only
HOLE ORDER — BLACK TEES23024880330240230245952502502307526521510035075325142433455464748394104114123135144153165173185PAROUT 1,948 YDSIN 1,885 YDSFIRST NINESECOND NINE
The published card in playing order, 18 holes with the two nines split — hole number under each bar, its par below that.

The course

access
semi-private
address
222 Clubhouse Drive, West Columbia, SC, 29172
phone
803-755-2000
elevation
254 ft derived
opened
1993
on site
driving range · pro shop · restaurant · lessons

33.90112, -81.09911 — open on OpenStreetMap →

The course, from above

OpenStreetMap has this course's outline but has not traced any of its 18 holes. The shaded area is the property; no hole, green or tee is drawn.

The outline of Charwood Country Club as OpenStreetMap holds it, drawn over NAIP 2023 aerial imagery. No hole, green or tee has been traced inside it.

Use arrow keys to pan, plus and minus to zoom. Tab reaches the map controls.

The outline of Charwood Country Club as OpenStreetMap holds it, drawn over NAIP 2023 aerial imagery. No hole, green or tee has been traced inside it. The map itself needs JavaScript; the outline is a plain GeoJSON file either way.

Imported from OpenStreetMap, edges unchecked · USDA NAIP 2023-04-12

The outline is the whole of the traced geometry here, so there is no hole or green to jump to and nothing to measure a yardage against.

Tees & ratings

Ratingsopen datachecked 2026-08-14

All 6 tee sets par, yardage, course rating, slope — the full table

Sorted by Yards, descending. 6 rows.

BlackM716365contested383369.612819481885
Combo Tees 1M71600268.6127
GreenM71572967.712527682929
Combo Tees 2M71535266.3120
YellowM714897contested478463.511523422442
GarnetM713833contested609860.510529733125

Every figure as published except Card yards (derived), which is summed from the card below and shown only where a published figure is contested; a blank cell elsewhere is one nobody publishes. Front 9 and Back 9 are summed from the per-hole yardages on the scorecard.

The Black, Yellow and Garnet tees publish a yardage total the scorecard below does not add up to. Both figures are published and nothing we hold settles which one a round plays to, so the Yards column keeps the published figure, marked contested, and each tee's own yardage row from the card below is summed beside it, marked derived.

Scorecard

Scorecardopen datachecked 2026-08-14

Hole 123456789101112131415161718 Total
Par 443544434443543535 71
Black 23024880330240230245952502502307526521510035075325 6,365
Green 369327148483340303350131317315349150472341145495185477 5,729
Yellow 29425711943927123334395291275253108394309121380156446 4,897
Garnet 385349170513359323384145345329391157502367157505220497 3,833
Handicap 515917113171310164181214628

No per-hole yardages are published for Combo Tees 1 and Combo Tees 2, so they are not on the card above.

The Studio

The Studio can't plan Charwood Country Club hole by hole yet.

We hold its scorecard, but nobody has traced its holes: the bunkers, water and fairway edges a plan aims around.

It plans 4,579 courses hole by hole today, and it charts your bag anywhere.

  • The approach, planned A Studio approach map on the aerial photo: a lob wedge aimed at the island green, its spread drawn as a dashed ring over the water, and the side it most often misses. Example from another course: hole 15, Resort tee, Stadium Course at TPC Scottsdale
  • The green, from LiDAR A Studio green view on the aerial photo: arrows for the slope a LiDAR survey measured, the area a cup could be cut, and the safer side to miss. Example from another course: hole 15, Stadium Course at TPC Scottsdale
  • Every shot, tee to green A Studio plan on the aerial photo of a desert par 4: the driver off the tee and a 7-iron into the green between the bunkers, each shot with its landing spread drawn as a dashed ring. Example from another course: hole 2, Resort tee, Stadium Course at TPC Scottsdale

See the courses it plans Open the Studio

Pictures: Studio output for a sample golfer, drawn 2026-10-15. The Studio needs a free account. AI can make mistakes.

© OpenStreetMap contributors

Book a tee time

Rates change by day and by season, so we send you to Charwood Country Club's own booking page rather than quoting a figure that was true the week we captured it.

Check tee times and rates

Also bookable nearby: Solina Golf Club (4.5 mi) · Hidden Valley Golf Club (4.7 mi) · Golden Hills Golf & Country Club (9.0 mi) · Riverside Golf Center (9.9 mi)

Measured against comparable courses

How hard and how long this course plays against comparable courses — never how good it is.

FigureThis courseIn South CarolinaNationwideAmong its peers
Longest6,365 yds280th of 351=6,997th of 12,02524th of 28 in the Columbia, SC metro area · 1,060th of 2,030 semi-private courses · =3,545th of 7,004 courses you can book · =6,933rd of 9,017 18-hole regulation courses
Toughest testslope 128=177th of 227=4,449th of 8,710=16th of 25 in the Columbia, SC metro area · =599th of 1,395 semi-private courses · =2,008th of 4,936 courses you can book · =4,313th of 7,089 18-hole regulation courses
Hardest from the tipsrating 69.6206th of 215=6,380th of 7,61522nd of 24 in the Columbia, SC metro area · =954th of 1,141 semi-private courses · =3,281st of 4,145 courses you can book · =6,245th of 7,034 18-hole regulation courses
Widest tee spread2,532 yds between tees31st of 345=703rd of 11,5234th of 28 in the Columbia, SC metro area · 109th of 1,970 semi-private courses · 326th of 6,653 courses you can book · =687th of 8,962 18-hole regulation courses
Oldestopened 1993=172nd of 253=6,728th of 9,36823rd of 26 in the Columbia, SC metro area · =1,119th of 1,516 semi-private courses · =3,744th of 5,526 courses you can book · =4,882nd of 7,001 18-hole regulation courses
Highest above sea level254 ft derived 145th of 374=8,708th of 12,43723rd of 29 in the Columbia, SC metro area · =1,466th of 2,089 semi-private courses · =5,466th of 7,274 courses you can book · =6,246th of 9,106 18-hole regulation courses

What's on this page

In progress2 of 6 built

2 of 6 parts of this course page are built, and we're filling in the rest.

  • Scorecard, built.Par and yardage for every hole, from 4 sets of tees.
  • Course rating and slope, built.Rated from 6 sets of tees.
  • Course map, partly built.The course's outline is drawn, but none of its 18 holes has been traced in OpenStreetMap yet.
  • Per-hole distances, not built yet.The holes aren't traced yet, so there are no measured carries or distances to the green.
  • Green contours, not built yet.We haven't built the green contours for this course yet.
  • Course details, partly built.5 of 7 background details — we don't hold the architect and the grass on the greens.

The site is in beta and the database is still being built, so expect gaps. Know something we don't? Help us fill it in — a link to where it's published is worth more than anything else you could send.

Sources

Gathered from the course's own site and public records — every figure on this page is traceable to who published it and when. Spot an error or a gap? Tell us.

Location and identity seeded from OpenStreetMap — © OpenStreetMap contributors, ODbL. Last checked 2026-08-14. Where each figure came from is stated beside it, above.

Compare this course →

Or go straight to a comparison: vs Solina Golf Club · vs Hidden Valley Golf Club · vs Golden Hills Golf & Country Club

Nearby courses

Straight-line distance from this course's coordinates, within 60 miles — not driving distance, and it crosses state lines where the nearest courses are over one.

Know something about this course? 6 fields we don't hold — or tell us something here is wrong