Skip to content
Zomma Golf
Menu

Bunker Hills Executive Course is a 9-hole public golf course in Coon Rapids, Minnesota.

Designed by David Gill. It plays 2,000 yards from the White tees.

Create a free account to save Bunker Hills Executive Course to My Game, where every course you save is measured against the rest of its state on the figures it publishes.
9
holes
31
par
2,000
yards (tips)
The shape of the round · White teespublished figures only
HOLE ORDER — WHITE TEES155360155140330240125260110132433435464738493PAROUT 810 YDSIN 1,065 YDSFIRST NINESECOND NINE
The published card in playing order, 9 holes with the two nines split — hole number under each bar, its par below that.

The course

designer
David Gill reported
access
public
address
Bunker Prairie Road Northwest, Coon Rapids, MN, 55448
elevation
888 ft derived
opened
1968
turf
Bent Grass & Poa Annua greens · Bent Grass & Poa Annua fairways

45.19963, -93.28496 — open on OpenStreetMap →

The course, from above

This map shows 8 of 9 holes. OpenStreetMap has not traced hole 5. 4 mapped features sit close to more than one hole and are drawn with the nearer one. The map below draws everything that has been traced.

70 traced features across 8 layers for Bunker Hills Executive Course, drawn over no aerial imagery.

Use arrow keys to pan, plus and minus to zoom. Tab reaches the map controls.

70 traced features across 8 layers for Bunker Hills Executive Course, drawn over no aerial imagery. The map itself needs JavaScript; the geometry is a plain GeoJSON file either way.

9
Holes
8
Fairways
10
Bunkers
6
Water
8
Greens
13
Tee pads
1,545yds
White tees
360yds
Longest hole
110yds
Shortest hole

Imported from OpenStreetMap, edges unchecked

Tees & ratings

Ratingsopen datachecked 2026-08-15

All 2 tee sets par, yardage — the full table

Sorted by Yards, descending. 2 rows.

WhiteM32contested312000contested1875
RedF32contested311780contested1665

Every figure as published except Card par (derived) and Card yards (derived), which are summed from the card below and shown only where a published figure is contested; a blank cell elsewhere is one nobody publishes.

The White and Red tees publish a par the scorecard below does not add up to. Both figures are published and nothing we hold settles which one a round plays to, so the Par column keeps the published figure, marked contested, and each tee's own par row from the card below is summed beside it, marked derived.

The White and Red tees publish a yardage total the scorecard below does not add up to. Both figures are published and nothing we hold settles which one a round plays to, so the Yards column keeps the published figure, marked contested, and each tee's own yardage row from the card below is summed beside it, marked derived.

Scorecard — every published tee

Scorecardopen datachecked 2026-08-15

Hole 123456789 Total
Par 343344343 31
White 155360155140330240125260110 2,000
Red 14532514513025522011524090 1,780
Handicap 817425639

The Studio

The Studio can't plan Bunker Hills Executive Course hole by hole yet.

We hold its scorecard and 70 traced features, but not a model of every green, which a plan aims at.

It plans 4,579 courses hole by hole today, and it charts your bag anywhere.

  • The approach, planned A Studio approach map on the aerial photo: a lob wedge aimed at the island green, its spread drawn as a dashed ring over the water, and the side it most often misses. Example from another course: hole 15, Resort tee, Stadium Course at TPC Scottsdale
  • The green, from LiDAR A Studio green view on the aerial photo: arrows for the slope a LiDAR survey measured, the area a cup could be cut, and the safer side to miss. Example from another course: hole 15, Stadium Course at TPC Scottsdale
  • Every shot, tee to green A Studio plan on the aerial photo of a desert par 4: the driver off the tee and a 7-iron into the green between the bunkers, each shot with its landing spread drawn as a dashed ring. Example from another course: hole 2, Resort tee, Stadium Course at TPC Scottsdale

See the courses it plans Open the Studio

Pictures: Studio output for a sample golfer, drawn 2026-10-15. The Studio needs a free account. AI can make mistakes.

© OpenStreetMap contributors

Measured against comparable courses

How hard and how long this course plays against comparable courses — never how good it is.

FigureThis courseIn MinnesotaNationwideAmong its peers
Longest2,000 yds246th of 261=11,545th of 12,025105th of 116 in the Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI metro area · 3,861st of 4,105 public courses · =6,686th of 7,004 courses you can book · =539th of 702 short courses nationwide — executive and short regulation
Widest tee spread220 yds between tees237th of 249=11,165th of 11,523104th of 110 in the Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI metro area · =3,681st of 3,841 public courses · =6,415th of 6,653 courses you can book · =524th of 615 short courses nationwide — executive and short regulation
Oldestopened 1968=109th of 240=4,141st of 9,368=39th of 108 in the Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI metro area · =1,197th of 3,277 public courses · =2,135th of 5,526 courses you can book · =217th of 531 short courses nationwide — executive and short regulation
Highest above sea level888 ft derived =243rd of 281=4,225th of 12,437=97th of 122 in the Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI metro area · =1,624th of 4,289 public courses · =2,747th of 7,274 courses you can book · 226th of 714 short courses nationwide — executive and short regulation

A published figure is compared only against the courses that publish it too, which is why the totals differ from row to row — a state's length field is the courses with a scorecard, not the courses in the state. Height above sea level is the exception: we derive it from a coordinate, so its field is very nearly every course we render. Ties share an ordinal and are marked =. How this is computed →

What's on this page

In progress2 of 6 built

2 of 6 parts of this course page are built, and we're filling in the rest.

  • Scorecard, built.Par and yardage for every hole, from 2 sets of tees.
  • Course rating and slope, not built yet.We don't have a course rating or slope for this course yet.
  • Course map, partly built.8 of the 9 greens are drawn — the rest of the course isn't mapped yet.
  • Per-hole distances, built.Every hole is traced, so carries and distances to the front, middle and back of each green are measured along the line you actually play.
  • Green contours, not built yet.We haven't built the green contours for this course yet.
  • Course details, partly built.5 of 7 background details — we don't hold a website and a phone number.

The site is in beta and the database is still being built, so expect gaps. Know something we don't? Help us fill it in — a link to where it's published is worth more than anything else you could send.

Sources

Gathered from the course's own published information and public records — every figure on this page is traceable to who published it and when. Spot an error or a gap? Tell us.

Location and identity seeded from OpenStreetMap — © OpenStreetMap contributors, ODbL. Last checked 2026-08-15. Where each figure came from is stated beside it, above.

Compare this course →

Or go straight to a comparison: vs Victory Links Golf Course · vs Brookland Golf Park · vs Rum River Hills Golf Club

Nearby courses

Victory Links Golf Course

4.5 mi · Minneapolis · public · 18 holes

Brookland Golf Park

7.2 mi · Brooklyn Park · municipal · 9 holes

Rum River Hills Golf Club

8.0 mi · Ramsey · public · 18 holes

Brightwood Hills Golf Course

8.9 mi · New Birghton · 9 holes

Chomonix Golf Course

9.2 mi · Lino Lakes · public · 18 holes

Centerbrook Golf Course

10 mi · Brooklyn Center · public · 9 holes

The Refuge Golf Course

10 mi · Oak Grove · public · 18 holes

Daytona Golf Course

10 mi · Dayton · public · 18 holes

Straight-line distance from this course's coordinates, within 60 miles — not driving distance, and it crosses state lines where the nearest courses are over one.

Know something about this course? 10 fields we don't hold — or tell us something here is wrong