Skip to content
Zomma Golf
Menu

Sycamore Hills Golf Club is an 18-hole public course in Macomb, Michigan.

Designed by Jerry Matthews.

Create a free account to save Sycamore Hills Golf Club to My Game, where every course you save is measured against the rest of its state on the figures it publishes.

18
holes
72
par

The course

designer
Jerry Matthews
access
public
address
48787 North Avenue, Macomb, MI
phone
586-598-9500
elevation
592 ft derived
opened
1990
on site
pro shop · restaurant · lessons

“Designed by master golf architect Jerry Matthews, the three 9-hole courses at Sycamore Hills” — the course's own page

42.65513, -82.88451 — open on OpenStreetMap →

The course, from above

This map shows all 18 holes. 63 mapped features sit close to more than one hole and are drawn with the nearer one.

250 traced features across 8 layers for Sycamore Hills Golf Club, drawn over NAIP 2022 aerial imagery.

Use arrow keys to pan, plus and minus to zoom. Tab reaches the map controls.

250 traced features across 8 layers for Sycamore Hills Golf Club, drawn over NAIP 2022 aerial imagery. The map itself needs JavaScript; the geometry is a plain GeoJSON file either way.

18
Holes
31
Fairways
63
Bunkers
6
Water
18
Greens
74
Tee pads

Imported from OpenStreetMap, edges unchecked · USDA NAIP 2022-08-31

Book a tee time

Rates change by day and by season, so we send you to Sycamore Hills Golf Club's own booking page rather than quoting a figure that was true the week we captured it.

Check tee times and rates

Also bookable nearby: Hickory Hollow Golf Course (0.3 mi) · Cracklewood Golf Club! (3.9 mi) · Fern Hill Golf Club (5.9 mi) · Salt River Golf Course (6.1 mi)

Measured against comparable courses

How hard and how long this course plays against comparable courses — never how good it is.

FigureThis courseIn MichiganNationwideAmong its peers
Oldestopened 1990=319th of 475=6,280th of 9,368=97th of 133 in the Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MI metro area · =1,949th of 3,277 public courses · =3,438th of 5,526 courses you can book · =4,506th of 7,001 18-hole regulation courses
Highest above sea level592 ft derived =611th of 644=6,695th of 12,437=147th of 163 in the Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MI metro area · =2,675th of 4,289 public courses · =4,334th of 7,274 courses you can book · =4,757th of 9,106 18-hole regulation courses

What's on this page

In progress2 of 6 built

2 of 6 parts of this course page are built, and we're filling in the rest.

  • Scorecard, not built yet.We know it plays 18 holes, but we don't have the scorecard yet — no par or yardage per hole.
  • Course rating and slope, not built yet.We don't have a course rating or slope for this course yet.
  • Course map, built.All 18 greens drawn, with the fairways, bunkers and water, over aerial imagery.
  • Per-hole distances, built.Every hole is traced, so carries and distances to the front, middle and back of each green are measured along the line you actually play.
  • Green contours, not built yet.We haven't built the green contours for this course yet.
  • Course details, partly built.6 of 7 background details — we don't hold the grass on the greens.

The site is in beta and the database is still being built, so expect gaps. Know something we don't? Help us fill it in — a link to where it's published is worth more than anything else you could send.

Sources

Gathered from the course's own site and public records — every figure on this page is traceable to who published it and when. Spot an error or a gap? Tell us.

Location and identity seeded from OpenStreetMap — © OpenStreetMap contributors, ODbL. Last checked 2026-08-14. Where each figure came from is stated beside it, above.

Compare this course →

Or go straight to a comparison: vs Hickory Hollow Golf Course · vs Cracklewood Golf Club! · vs Gowanie Country Club

Nearby courses

Straight-line distance from this course's coordinates, within 60 miles — not driving distance, and it crosses state lines where the nearest courses are over one.

Know something about this course? 7 fields we don't hold — or tell us something here is wrong