Skip to content
Zomma Golf
Menu

Richter Park Golf Course is an 18-hole public course in Danbury, Connecticut.

Designed by Edward Ryder. It plays 6,744 yards from the Blue tees, rated 73.6/139 (checked 2026-08-15).

Create a free account to save Richter Park Golf Course to My Game, where every course you save is measured against the rest of its state on the figures it publishes.

18
holes
71
par
6,744
yards (tips)
139
slope (blue)
The shape of the round · Blue teespublished figures only
HOLE ORDER — BLUE TEES398518183430174413526359344185387527161417342580165438142533445364758494103114125133144154165173184PAROUT 3,345 YDSIN 3,202 YDSFIRST NINESECOND NINE
The published card in playing order, 18 holes with the two nines split — hole number under each bar, its par below that.

The course

designer
Edward Ryder reported
access
public
address
100 Aunt Hack Rd, Danbury, CT 06811, USA
phone
203-792-2550
elevation
669 ft derived
opened
1970
turf
Bent/Poa greens · Blue/Rye fairways
on site
driving range · lessons

41.41361, -73.52000 — open on OpenStreetMap →

The course, from above

This map shows all 18 holes. 11 mapped features sit close to more than one hole and are drawn with the nearer one.

176 traced features across 8 layers for Richter Park Golf Course, drawn over NAIP 2023 aerial imagery.

Use arrow keys to pan, plus and minus to zoom. Tab reaches the map controls.

176 traced features across 8 layers for Richter Park Golf Course, drawn over NAIP 2023 aerial imagery. The map itself needs JavaScript; the geometry is a plain GeoJSON file either way.

18
Holes
20
Fairways
37
Bunkers
10
Water
18
Greens
43
Tee pads
6,547yds
Blue tees
580yds
Longest hole
161yds
Shortest hole

Imported from OpenStreetMap, edges unchecked · USDA NAIP 2023-07-05

Tees & ratings

Ratingsopen datachecked 2026-08-15

All 4 tee sets par, yardage, course rating, slope — the full table

Sorted by Yards, descending. 4 rows.

BlueM72contested716744contested654773.613933453202
WhiteM72contested716304contested611971.613631133006
GoldM72contested715531contested533572.912926352700
RedM72contested715114contested492270.712424322490

Every figure as published except Card par (derived) and Card yards (derived), which are summed from the card below and shown only where a published figure is contested; a blank cell elsewhere is one nobody publishes. Front 9 and Back 9 are summed from the per-hole yardages on the scorecard.

The Blue, White, Gold and Red tees publish a par the scorecard below does not add up to. Both figures are published and nothing we hold settles which one a round plays to, so the Par column keeps the published figure, marked contested, and each tee's own par row from the card below is summed beside it, marked derived.

The Blue, White, Gold and Red tees publish a yardage total the scorecard below does not add up to. Both figures are published and nothing we hold settles which one a round plays to, so the Yards column keeps the published figure, marked contested, and each tee's own yardage row from the card below is summed beside it, marked derived.

Scorecard — every published tee

Scorecardopen datachecked 2026-08-15

Hole 123456789101112131415161718 Total
Par 453434544345344534 71
Blue 398518183430174413526359344185387527161417342580165438 6,744
White 372495150386170387508337308160367479142395319570152422 6,304
Gold 350447137301100333367300300142340442120377263484130402 5,531
Red 319390132301100333367244246120290430120292263462111402 5,114
Handicap 911173151751314106168124182

Plan it in the Studio

Plan Richter Park Golf Course hole by hole, for your game.

Ask in plain words. The Studio draws each hole on the aerial photo, picks a club for each shot from your carries and the way you miss, and shows where a miss costs you strokes. Where a green was surveyed, it reads the slope too.

  • The approach, planned A Studio approach map on the aerial photo: a lob wedge aimed at the island green, its spread drawn as a dashed ring over the water, and the side it most often misses. Example from another course: hole 15, Resort tee, Stadium Course at TPC Scottsdale
  • The green, from LiDAR A Studio green view on the aerial photo: arrows for the slope a LiDAR survey measured, the area a cup could be cut, and the safer side to miss. Example from another course: hole 15, Stadium Course at TPC Scottsdale
  • Every shot, tee to green A Studio plan on the aerial photo of a desert par 4: the driver off the tee and a 7-iron into the green between the bunkers, each shot with its landing spread drawn as a dashed ring. Example from another course: hole 2, Resort tee, Stadium Course at TPC Scottsdale

Plan this course in the Studio

Pictures: Studio output for a sample golfer, drawn 2026-10-15. The Studio needs a free account. AI can make mistakes.

© OpenStreetMap contributors

Book a tee time

Rates change by day and by season, so we send you to Richter Park Golf Course's own booking page rather than quoting a figure that was true the week we captured it.

Check tee times and rates

Also bookable nearby: Ridgefield Golf Course (3.9 mi) · Pehquenakonck Country Club (5.1 mi) · Lakes Fairways at Centennial Golf Club (6.8 mi) · Fairways Meadows at Centennial Golf Club (7.0 mi)

Measured against comparable courses

How hard and how long this course plays against comparable courses — never how good it is.

FigureThis courseIn ConnecticutNationwideAmong its peers
Longest6,744 yds31st of 186=3,981st of 12,025=1,012th of 4,105 public courses · =1,889th of 7,004 courses you can book · =3,955th of 9,017 18-hole regulation courses
Toughest testslope 139=9th of 157=1,166th of 8,710=214th of 2,882 public courses · =445th of 4,936 courses you can book · =1,140th of 7,089 18-hole regulation courses
Hardest from the tipsrating 73.6=16th of 131=1,853rd of 7,615=393rd of 2,412 public courses · =772nd of 4,145 courses you can book · =1,838th of 7,034 18-hole regulation courses
Widest tee spread1,630 yds between tees31st of 180=4,545th of 11,523=1,254th of 3,841 public courses · =2,373rd of 6,653 courses you can book · =4,476th of 8,962 18-hole regulation courses
Oldestopened 1970=128th of 176=4,455th of 9,368=1,310th of 3,277 public courses · =2,340th of 5,526 courses you can book · =3,157th of 7,001 18-hole regulation courses
Highest above sea level669 ft derived 23rd of 191=5,989th of 12,437=2,383rd of 4,289 public courses · =3,893rd of 7,274 courses you can book · =4,252nd of 9,106 18-hole regulation courses

What's on this page

In progress5 of 6 built

5 of 6 parts of this course page are built, and we're filling in the rest.

  • Scorecard, built.Par and yardage for every hole, from 4 sets of tees.
  • Course rating and slope, built.Rated from 4 sets of tees.
  • Course map, built.All 18 greens drawn, with the fairways, bunkers and water, over aerial imagery.
  • Per-hole distances, built.Every hole is traced, so carries and distances to the front, middle and back of each green are measured along the line you actually play.
  • Green contours, not built yet.We haven't built the green contours for this course yet.
  • Course details, built.All 7 background details — architect, year opened, access, contact and grass.

The site is in beta and the database is still being built, so expect gaps. What's left on this course is ours to build rather than ours to be told — it comes from mapping and survey data, not from a form. Coverage sets out where the whole database stands.

Sources

Gathered from the course's own site and public records — every figure on this page is traceable to who published it and when. Spot an error or a gap? Tell us.

Location and identity seeded from OpenStreetMap — © OpenStreetMap contributors, ODbL. Last checked 2026-08-15. Where each figure came from is stated beside it, above.

Compare this course →

Or go straight to a comparison: vs Morefar Golf Course · vs Ridgewood Country Club · vs Ridgefield Golf Course

Nearby courses

Straight-line distance from this course's coordinates, within 60 miles — not driving distance, and it crosses state lines where the nearest courses are over one.

Know something about this course? 5 fields we don't hold — or tell us something here is wrong