Skip to content
Zomma Golf
Menu

Catamount Ranch and Club is an 18-hole private golf course in Steamboat Springs, Colorado.

It plays 7,088 yards from the Black tees, rated 73.4/149 (checked 2026-08-15).

Create a free account to save Catamount Ranch and Club to My Game, where every course you save is measured against the rest of its state on the figures it publishes.
18
holes
72
par
7,088
yards (tips)
149
slope (black)
The shape of the round · Black teespublished figures only
HOLE ORDER — BLACK TEES517547450230310315423211471530413341378185469455209628152534435464748394105114124134143154164173185PAROUT 3,474 YDSIN 3,608 YDSFIRST NINESECOND NINE
The published card in playing order, 18 holes with the two nines split — hole number under each bar, its par below that.

The course

access
private
address
33400 Catamount Dr B, Steamboat Springs, CO 80487, USA
elevation
6,925 ft derived
opened
2000

40.41732, -106.80000 — open on OpenStreetMap →

The course, from above

This map shows all 18 holes. 13 mapped features sit close to more than one hole and are drawn with the nearer one.

218 traced features across 8 layers for Catamount Ranch and Club, drawn over NAIP 2019 aerial imagery.

Use arrow keys to pan, plus and minus to zoom. Tab reaches the map controls.

218 traced features across 8 layers for Catamount Ranch and Club, drawn over NAIP 2019 aerial imagery. The map itself needs JavaScript; the geometry is a plain GeoJSON file either way.

18
Holes
22
Fairways
62
Bunkers
1
Water
18
Greens
70
Tee pads
7,082yds
Black tees
628yds
Longest hole
185yds
Shortest hole

Imported from OpenStreetMap, edges unchecked · USDA NAIP 2019-09-24

Tees & ratings

Ratingsopen datachecked 2026-08-15

All 4 tee sets par, yardage, course rating, slope — the full table

Sorted by Yards, descending. 4 rows.

BlackM72708873.414934743608
GoldM72665771.414232423421
Gold/SilverM72643869.1133
SilverM725984contested609566.613030143081

Every figure as published except Card yards (derived), which is summed from the card below and shown only where a published figure is contested; a blank cell elsewhere is one nobody publishes. Front 9 and Back 9 are summed from the per-hole yardages on the scorecard.

The Silver tees publish a yardage total the scorecard below does not add up to. Both figures are published and nothing we hold settles which one a round plays to, so the Yards column keeps the published figure, marked contested, and each tee's own yardage row from the card below is summed beside it, marked derived.

Scorecard

Scorecardopen datachecked 2026-08-15

Hole 123456789101112131415161718 Total
Par 554344434544434435 72
Black 517547450230310315423211471530413341378185469455209628 7,088
Gold 485519422188282297402198449507419321355164437435188595 6,657
Silver 456477370162248288396181436469397301298137381381184533 5,984
Handicap 711917151313568412181410162

No per-hole yardages are published for Gold/Silver, so it is not on the card above.

Plan it in the Studio

Plan Catamount Ranch and Club hole by hole, for your game.

Ask in plain words. The Studio draws each hole on the aerial photo, picks a club for each shot from your carries and the way you miss, and shows where a miss costs you strokes. Where a green was surveyed, it reads the slope too.

  • The approach, planned A Studio approach map on the aerial photo: a lob wedge aimed at the island green, its spread drawn as a dashed ring over the water, and the side it most often misses. Example from another course: hole 15, Resort tee, Stadium Course at TPC Scottsdale
  • The green, from LiDAR A Studio green view on the aerial photo: arrows for the slope a LiDAR survey measured, the area a cup could be cut, and the safer side to miss. Example from another course: hole 15, Stadium Course at TPC Scottsdale
  • Every shot, tee to green A Studio plan on the aerial photo of a desert par 4: the driver off the tee and a 7-iron into the green between the bunkers, each shot with its landing spread drawn as a dashed ring. Example from another course: hole 2, Resort tee, Stadium Course at TPC Scottsdale

Plan this course in the Studio

Pictures: Studio output for a sample golfer, drawn 2026-10-15. The Studio needs a free account. AI can make mistakes.

© OpenStreetMap contributors

Book nearby

Catamount Ranch and Club states private access, so there is no tee time here to book. The nearest courses that state access you can book: Rollingstone Ranch Golf Club (3.6 mi, resort) · Steamboat Golf Club (8.4 mi, semi-private) · Yampa Valley Golf Club (38 mi, public) · Grand Lake Golf Course (51 mi, public)

Measured against comparable courses

How hard and how long this course plays against comparable courses — never how good it is.

FigureThis courseIn ColoradoNationwideAmong its peers
Longest7,088 yds=72nd of 241=1,215th of 12,025=444th of 2,954 private courses · =1,212th of 9,017 18-hole regulation courses
Toughest testslope 149=4th of 208=88th of 8,710=45th of 2,300 private courses · =87th of 7,089 18-hole regulation courses
Hardest from the tipsrating 73.4=52nd of 188=2,119th of 7,615=858th of 2,143 private courses · =2,101st of 7,034 18-hole regulation courses
Widest tee spread1,104 yds between tees181st of 233=7,839th of 11,523=2,210th of 2,885 private courses · =7,632nd of 8,962 18-hole regulation courses
Oldestopened 2000=184th of 233=8,024th of 9,368=2,126th of 2,418 private courses · =5,930th of 7,001 18-hole regulation courses
Highest above sea level6,925 ft derived 60th of 24489th of 12,43723rd of 3,026 private courses · 66th of 9,106 18-hole regulation courses

A published figure is compared only against the courses that publish it too, which is why the totals differ from row to row — a state's length field is the courses with a scorecard, not the courses in the state. Height above sea level is the exception: we derive it from a coordinate, so its field is very nearly every course we render. Ties share an ordinal and are marked =. How this is computed →

What's on this page

In progress4 of 6 built

4 of 6 parts of this course page are built, and we're filling in the rest.

  • Scorecard, built.Par and yardage for every hole, from 3 sets of tees.
  • Course rating and slope, built.Rated from 4 sets of tees.
  • Course map, built.All 18 greens drawn, with the fairways, bunkers and water, over aerial imagery.
  • Per-hole distances, built.Every hole is traced, so carries and distances to the front, middle and back of each green are measured along the line you actually play.
  • Green contours, not built yet.We haven't built the green contours for this course yet.
  • Course details, partly built.4 of 7 background details — we don't hold the architect, a phone number and the grass on the greens.

The site is in beta and the database is still being built, so expect gaps. Know something we don't? Help us fill it in — a link to where it's published is worth more than anything else you could send.

Sources

Gathered from the course's own site and public records — every figure on this page is traceable to who published it and when. Spot an error or a gap? Tell us.

Location and identity seeded from OpenStreetMap — © OpenStreetMap contributors, ODbL. Last checked 2026-08-15. Where each figure came from is stated beside it, above.

Compare this course →

Or go straight to a comparison: vs Haymaker · vs Rollingstone Ranch Golf Club · vs Steamboat Golf Club

Nearby courses

Haymaker

1.0 mi · Steamboat Springs · 18 holes

Rollingstone Ranch Golf Club

3.6 mi · Steamboat Springs · resort · 18 holes

Steamboat Golf Club

8.4 mi · Steamboat Springs · semi-private · 9 holes

Yampa Valley Golf Club

38 mi · Craig · public · 18 holes

Red Sky Golf Club Fazio Course

51 mi · Wolcott · private · 18 holes

Red Sky Golf Club Norman Course

51 mi · Wolcott · private · 18 holes

Grand Lake Golf Course

51 mi · Grand Lake · public · 18 holes

Eagle Springs Golf Club

51 mi · Wolcott · private · 18 holes

Straight-line distance from this course's coordinates, within 60 miles — not driving distance, and it crosses state lines where the nearest courses are over one.

Know something about this course? 11 fields we don't hold — or tell us something here is wrong