Skip to content
Zomma Golf
Menu

Spring Hills Golf Course is an 18-hole public course in Watsonville, California.

It plays 6,073 yards from the Blue tees, rated 70/122 (checked 2026-08-14).

Create a free account to save Spring Hills Golf Course to My Game, where every course you save is measured against the rest of its state on the figures it publishes.

18
holes
71
par
6,073
yards (tips)
122
slope (blue)
The shape of the round · Blue teespublished figures only
HOLE ORDER — BLUE TEES406431358347349462194398187165475343108366176527508273142434445465738493103115124133144153165175184PAROUT 3,132 YDSIN 2,941 YDSFIRST NINESECOND NINE
The published card in playing order, 18 holes with the two nines split — hole number under each bar, its par below that.

The course

access
public
address
501 Spring Hills Dr, Watsonville, CA 95076, USA
elevation
116 ft derived
opened
1965

36.98121, -121.75616 — open on OpenStreetMap →

The course, from above

This map shows all 18 holes. Hole 18: line and green predicted by a model from USDA NAIP aerial imagery. Other holes: traced by OpenStreetMap contributors. 3 mapped features sit close to more than one hole and are drawn with the nearer one.

126 features across 7 layers for Spring Hills Golf Course, 124 traced and 2 predicted by a model, drawn over NAIP 2022 aerial imagery.

Use arrow keys to pan, plus and minus to zoom. Tab reaches the map controls.

126 features across 7 layers for Spring Hills Golf Course, 124 traced and 2 predicted by a model, drawn over NAIP 2022 aerial imagery. The map itself needs JavaScript; the geometry is a plain GeoJSON file either way.

Hole 18 predicted from USDA NAIP imagery · Contains information from SatlasPretrain, which is made available under the ODC Attribution License

18
Holes
23
Fairways
13
Bunkers
1
Water
18
Greens
35
Tee pads
6,073yds
Blue tees
527yds
Longest hole
108yds
Shortest hole

124 imported from OpenStreetMap and the lines and greens of hole 18 predicted by a model from aerial imagery, hole lines and edges unchecked · USDA NAIP 2022-05-19

Tees & ratings

Ratingsopen datachecked 2026-08-14

All 8 tee sets par, yardage, course rating, slope — the full table

Sorted by Yards, descending. 8 rows.

BlueF71607375.713031322941
BlueM71607370.012231322941
WhiteM71588369.312130242859
WhiteF71588374.912630242859
GoldF71559672.812228052791
GoldM71559667.811728052791
RedF71520070.811926022598
RedM71520066.211126022598

Every figure as published; a blank cell is one nobody publishes. Front 9 and Back 9 are summed from the per-hole yardages on the scorecard.

Scorecard — every published tee

Scorecardopen datachecked 2026-08-14

Hole 123456789101112131415161718 Total
Par 444445343354343554 71
Blue 406431358347349462194398187165475343108366176527508273 6,073
White 386421349340338452182387169156464333105357164518502260 5,883
Gold 379350341336274440172357156149459327103352161509478253 5,596
Red 347344270306266417160352140146408319102346157456424240 5,200
Handicap 111313791751518610144162812

Plan it in the Studio

Plan Spring Hills Golf Course hole by hole, for your game.

Ask in plain words. The Studio draws each hole on the aerial photo, picks a club for each shot from your carries and the way you miss, and shows where a miss costs you strokes. Where a green was surveyed, it reads the slope too.

  • The approach, planned A Studio approach map on the aerial photo: a lob wedge aimed at the island green, its spread drawn as a dashed ring over the water, and the side it most often misses. Example from another course: hole 15, Resort tee, Stadium Course at TPC Scottsdale
  • The green, from LiDAR A Studio green view on the aerial photo: arrows for the slope a LiDAR survey measured, the area a cup could be cut, and the safer side to miss. Example from another course: hole 15, Stadium Course at TPC Scottsdale
  • Every shot, tee to green A Studio plan on the aerial photo of a desert par 4: the driver off the tee and a 7-iron into the green between the bunkers, each shot with its landing spread drawn as a dashed ring. Example from another course: hole 2, Resort tee, Stadium Course at TPC Scottsdale

Plan this course in the Studio

Pictures: Studio output for a sample golfer, drawn 2026-10-15. The Studio needs a free account. AI can make mistakes.

© OpenStreetMap contributors

Book a tee time

Rates change by day and by season, so we send you to Spring Hills Golf Course's own booking page rather than quoting a figure that was true the week we captured it.

Check tee times and rates

Also bookable nearby: Casserly Par 3 Golf Course (0.7 mi) · Seascape Golf Club (7.1 mi) · Pajaro Valley Golf Club (7.3 mi) · Gilroy Golf Course (7.8 mi)

Measured against comparable courses

How hard and how long this course plays against comparable courses — never how good it is.

FigureThis courseIn CaliforniaNationwideAmong its peers
Longest6,073 yds=652nd of 889=8,228th of 12,025112th of 147 in the San Jose-San Francisco-Oakland, CA combined area · =2,367th of 4,105 public courses · =4,337th of 7,004 courses you can book · =8,151st of 9,017 18-hole regulation courses
Toughest testslope 122=563rd of 750=6,159th of 8,710=105th of 135 in the San Jose-San Francisco-Oakland, CA combined area · =1,629th of 2,882 public courses · =3,080th of 4,936 courses you can book · =5,821st of 7,089 18-hole regulation courses
Hardest from the tipsrating 70.0=556th of 685=6,086th of 7,615=103rd of 123 in the San Jose-San Francisco-Oakland, CA combined area · =1,682nd of 2,412 public courses · =3,081st of 4,145 courses you can book · =5,980th of 7,034 18-hole regulation courses
Widest tee spread873 yds between tees659th of 857=8,804th of 11,523110th of 145 in the San Jose-San Francisco-Oakland, CA combined area · =2,685th of 3,841 public courses · =4,823rd of 6,653 courses you can book · =8,377th of 8,962 18-hole regulation courses
Oldestopened 1965=322nd of 768=3,726th of 9,368=68th of 134 in the San Jose-San Francisco-Oakland, CA combined area · =1,027th of 3,277 public courses · =1,860th of 5,526 courses you can book · =2,631st of 7,001 18-hole regulation courses
Highest above sea level116 ft derived =690th of 917=9,824th of 12,437=95th of 150 in the San Jose-San Francisco-Oakland, CA combined area · =3,698th of 4,289 public courses · =6,039th of 7,274 courses you can book · =7,076th of 9,106 18-hole regulation courses

What's on this page

In progress4 of 6 built

4 of 6 parts of this course page are built, and we're filling in the rest.

  • Scorecard, built.Par and yardage for every hole, from 8 sets of tees.
  • Course rating and slope, built.Rated from 8 sets of tees.
  • Course map, built.All 18 greens drawn, with the fairways, bunkers and water, over aerial imagery. Hole 18 is predicted from aerial imagery; OpenStreetMap traced the rest.
  • Per-hole distances, built.Every hole has a line of play, so carries and distances to the front, middle and back of each green are measured along it. Hole 18 is predicted from aerial imagery; OpenStreetMap traced the rest.
  • Green contours, not built yet.We haven't built the green contours for this course yet.
  • Course details, partly built.4 of 7 background details — we don't hold the architect, a phone number and the grass on the greens.

The site is in beta and the database is still being built, so expect gaps. Know something we don't? Help us fill it in — a link to where it's published is worth more than anything else you could send.

Sources

Gathered from the course's own site and public records — every figure on this page is traceable to who published it and when. Spot an error or a gap? Tell us.

Location and identity seeded from OpenStreetMap — © OpenStreetMap contributors, ODbL. Last checked 2026-08-14. Where each figure came from is stated beside it, above.

Compare this course →

Or go straight to a comparison: vs Casserly Par 3 Golf Course · vs Seascape Golf Club · vs Pajaro Valley Golf Club

Nearby courses

Straight-line distance from this course's coordinates, within 60 miles — not driving distance, and it crosses state lines where the nearest courses are over one.

Know something about this course? 11 fields we don't hold — or tell us something here is wrong