Wilson iron
The Wilson Staff D200 Irons is an iron in 9 options from 21°–55°.
Built against the iron fieldpublished figures only
Where this club lands
The field is every iron in the database that publishes both of the chart's figures — every brand, not just Wilson.
This set's 7-iron is 31° — 45th percentile, stronger-lofted than 55% of the 889 sets that publish one. The median is 32°.
Loft ladder against the field
Loft at each club in the set over the middle half (p25–p75) of every comparable iron set on record — the busiest rung here is built from 900.
Wilson Staff D200 Ironsmiddle half of the field
A break in the line is a club the set does not publish a loft for — it is never bridged, because joining across a gap would draw a loft the manufacturer never stated. Every brand's name for the gap wedge is pooled into one rung, since only 25 of 917 sets publish two of them.
The head half
Read the set through
Wilson Staff D200 Irons · #7
- LOFT · X AXIS31°
- 45th percentile — stronger-lofted than 55% of the 889 sets that publish a 7-iron
- LIE · Y AXIS62°
- 44th percentile — flatter than 56% of the 889 sets that publish a 7-iron
7-iron field: Loft × Lie
The 7-iron of every comparable iron set on record publishing both loft and lie — 889 of them, binned by density.
Specifications by option
What this record publishes. Across 9 options: loft, lie, length and swingweight on every one.
9 rows, unsorted, collapsed — use the button below the table to show every option.
| 21 | #4 | 60 | 2 | 39 | D2 | Y |
| 24 | #5 | 61 | 2.5 | 38.5 | D2 | Y |
| 27 | #6 | 61.5 | 3 | 38 | D2 | Y |
| 31 | #7 | 62 | 3.5 | 37.5 | D2 | Y |
| 35 | #8 | 63 | 4 | 37 | D2 | Y |
| 39 | #9 | 63.5 | 4.5 | 36.5 | D2 | Y |
| 43 | PW | 64 | 5 | 36 | D2 | Y |
| 47 | GW | 64 | 6 | 35.75 | D2 | Y |
| 55 | SW* | 64 | 6 | 35.5 | D3 | Y |
Head geometry doesn't change with the shaft, so it's stated once. A blank cell means Wilson did not publish that figure — we don't estimate.
Measured against comparable clubs
Where this club's published fitting specs sit among comparable clubs — never how good it is.
| Figure | Published | All irons | 2015 | Among its peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strongest-lofted 7-iron | 31° | =332nd of 953 | too few comparable clubs to place | =16th of 39 Wilson irons · =125th of 237 mid-handicap irons |
| Widest loft range | 34° | =381st of 1,104 | too few comparable clubs to place | =10th of 42 Wilson irons · =87th of 237 mid-handicap irons |
| Most upright lie | 62° | =539th of 941 | too few comparable clubs to place | =2nd of 38 Wilson irons · =158th of 233 mid-handicap irons |
| Longest | 37.5" | =8th of 894 | too few comparable clubs to place | =1st of 38 Wilson irons · =4th of 227 mid-handicap irons |
player level — derived
This iron reads as built for a mid-handicap player — our deterministic reading of 7-iron loft 31° (no offset published). A design classification, not a rule about who may play it. How the bands are read →
Or go straight to a comparison: vs Cleveland CG Black CB Iron Set · vs Cobra Fly-Z Iron Set · vs PING i Iron Set
More irons
Wilson Staff D200 Demo Irons 2015 · 1 option Wilson Staff FG Tour V4 Utility Irons 2015 · 18°–24° · 12 options Wilson Staff D-100 Golf Irons 2013 · 16 options Wilson Staff D7 Forged Iron Set 2020 · 21.5°–44° · 7 options Cleveland CG Black CB Iron Set 2015 · 22°–56° · 9 options Cobra Fly-Z Iron Set 2015 · 17°–60° · 11 options Mizuno JPX EZ Forged Iron Set 2015 · 22°–50° · 8 options PING i Iron Set 2015 · 20°–50° · 9 options
Other Wilson irons on record. Irons released in 2015 by other brands, one per brand. Nothing here is a ranking or a recommendation. Browse every club →
What's on this page
In progress2 of 3 built
2 of 3 parts of this club page are built, and we're filling in the rest.
- Wilson's own specs, partly built.Taken from Wilson's product page. We haven't found their full spec sheet for this club yet, so some figures they publish may be missing.
- Published options, built.9 configurations with 5 of the 7 specs an iron can publish.
- Stock shaft, built.Wilson names no stock shaft for this club on the sources we hold, so there's nothing to link.
The site is in beta and the database is still being built, so expect gaps. Know something we don't? Help us fill it in — a link to where it's published is worth more than anything else you could send.