Titleist iron
The Titleist T400 Irons | Titleist T-Series is an iron in 10 options from 20°–55°.
Built against the iron fieldpublished figures only
Where this club lands
The field is every iron in the database that publishes both of the chart's figures — every brand, not just Titleist.
This set's 7-iron is 26° — 1st percentile, stronger-lofted than 99% of the 889 sets that publish one. The median is 32°.
Loft ladder against the field
Loft at each club in the set over the middle half (p25–p75) of every comparable iron set on record — the busiest rung here is built from 900.
Titleist T400 Irons | Titleist T-Seriesmiddle half of the field
A break in the line is a club the set does not publish a loft for — it is never bridged, because joining across a gap would draw a loft the manufacturer never stated. Every brand's name for the gap wedge is pooled into one rung, since only 25 of 917 sets publish two of them.
The head half
Read the set through
Titleist T400 Irons | Titleist T-Series · 7
- LOFT · X AXIS26°
- 1st percentile — stronger-lofted than 99% of the 889 sets that publish a 7-iron
- LIE · Y AXIS63°
- 97th percentile — more upright than 97% of the 889 sets that publish a 7-iron
7-iron field: Loft × Lie
The 7-iron of every comparable iron set on record publishing both loft and lie — 889 of them, binned by density.
Specifications by option
What this record publishes. Across 10 options: loft, lie and length on every one; swingweight on 9 of 10.
10 rows, unsorted, collapsed — use the button below the table to show every option.
| 20 | 5 | 62 | 38 | D2 |
| 23 | 6 | 62.5 | 37.5 | D2 |
| 26 | 7 | 63 | 37 | D2 |
| 29 | 8 | 63.5 | 36.5 | D2 |
| 33 | 9 | 64 | 36 | D2 |
| 38 | P | 64 | 35.75 | D2 |
| 43 | W | 64 | 35.5 | not published |
| 49 | W2 | 64 | 35.5 | D2 |
| 55 | W3 | 64 | 35.25 | D2 |
| 43 | W1 | 64 | 35.5 | D2 |
Head geometry doesn't change with the shaft, so it's stated once. A blank cell means Titleist did not publish that figure — we don't estimate.
Measured against comparable clubs
Where this club's published fitting specs sit among comparable clubs — never how good it is.
| Figure | Published | All irons | Its year | Among its peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strongest-lofted 7-iron | 26° | =1st of 953 | no release year on record | =1st of 124 Titleist irons · =1st of 208 high-handicap irons |
| Widest loft range | 35° | =325th of 1,104 | no release year on record | =18th of 129 Titleist irons · =80th of 208 high-handicap irons |
| Most upright lie | 63° | =33rd of 941 | no release year on record | =1st of 124 Titleist irons · =20th of 203 high-handicap irons |
| Longest | 37" | =265th of 894 | no release year on record | =1st of 115 Titleist irons · =110th of 201 high-handicap irons |
player level — derived
This iron reads as built for a high-handicap player — our deterministic reading of 7-iron loft 26° (no offset published). A design classification, not a rule about who may play it. How the bands are read →
Or go straight to a comparison: vs PXG 0211 XCOR2 Irons | Players Distance Irons · vs XXIO 13 Ladies Irons · vs TaylorMade 200 Steel Iron Set
More irons
Titleist 1979-80 Tour Model 18°–55° · 11 options Titleist 1981 Tour Model 1981 · 18°–55° · 11 options Titleist 1982-83 Tour Model 18°–55° · 11 options Titleist 1984 Tour Model 1984 · 18°–55° · 11 options Titleist 620 CB 2019 · 21°–47° · 8 options · 9 stock shafts Titleist 620 MB 2019 · 21°–47° · 8 options · 9 stock shafts Titleist 681 ''T'' Forged Irons 20°–49° · 9 options Titleist 681 Forged Blade Irons 17°–49° · 10 options
Other Titleist irons on record. Nothing here is a ranking or a recommendation. Browse every club →
What's on this page
In progress2 of 3 built
2 of 3 parts of this club page are built, and we're filling in the rest.
- Titleist's own specs, partly built.Taken from Titleist's product page. We haven't found their full spec sheet for this club yet, so some figures they publish may be missing.
- Published options, built.10 configurations with 4 of the 7 specs an iron can publish.
- Stock shaft, built.Titleist names no stock shaft for this club on the sources we hold, so there's nothing to link.
The site is in beta and the database is still being built, so expect gaps. Know something we don't? Help us fill it in — a link to where it's published is worth more than anything else you could send.