Skip to content
Zomma Golf
Menu

Titleist iron

The Titleist Forged 670 Irons is an iron in 9 options from 19°–48°.

9
options
19–48
loft °
Built against the iron fieldpublished figures only
DIFFERENCE FROM THE MEDIAN OF EVERY RECORD WE HOLDLOFTMEDIAN 33.0°32.0° -1LIEMEDIAN 62.5°62.5° 0LENGTHMEDIAN 37.00"37.50" +0.5OFFSETMEDIAN 0.115"0.105" -0.01
Each bar is this club's published figure minus the median of the 1,084 other irons on record that publish it — a median over the records we hold.

View on Titleist →

Where this club lands

The field is every iron in the database that publishes both of the chart's figures — every brand, not just Titleist.

This set's 7-iron is 36° — 99th percentile, weaker-lofted than 99% of the 889 sets that publish one. The median is 32°.

Loft ladder against the field

Loft at each club in the set over the middle half (p25–p75) of every comparable iron set on record — the busiest rung here is built from 900.

Titleist Forged 670 Ironsmiddle half of the field
2030405060123456789PWGW/AWSWLWLOFT (°)Titleist Forged 670 Irons — 2: 19°Titleist Forged 670 Irons — 3: 22°Titleist Forged 670 Irons — 4: 25°Titleist Forged 670 Irons — 5: 28°Titleist Forged 670 Irons — 6: 32°Titleist Forged 670 Irons — 7: 36°Titleist Forged 670 Irons — 8: 40°Titleist Forged 670 Irons — 9: 44°Titleist Forged 670 Irons — P: 48°

A break in the line is a club the set does not publish a loft for — it is never bridged, because joining across a gap would draw a loft the manufacturer never stated. Every brand's name for the gap wedge is pooled into one rung, since only 25 of 917 sets publish two of them.

The head half

Read the set through

Titleist Forged 670 Irons · 7 Iron

LOFT · X AXIS36°
99th percentile — weaker-lofted than 99% of the 889 sets that publish a 7-iron
LIE · Y AXIS63°
97th percentile — more upright than 97% of the 889 sets that publish a 7-iron
7-iron field: Loft × Lie

The 7-iron of every comparable iron set on record publishing both loft and lie — 889 of them, binned by density.

Offset

Published offset of 0.1 in: the leading edge sits 0.1 in behind the line of the shaft, against a median of 0.12 in for the 7-iron of 580 iron sets on record that publish one.MEDIAN 0.12 inOFFSET 0.1 inSHAFTLEADING EDGE0.25 INLEADING EDGE BEHIND THE SHAFTNOMINAL OUTLINE · SEEN FROM THE TOE · TRUE SCALE

Titleist Forged 670 Irons · 7 Iron — the leading edge sits behind the line of the shaft by the published figure, drawn to the scale marked and seen from the toe, which is the one view that shows offset truly: it runs perpendicular to the face, so a picture square to the face would have it pointing at you. The outline is a nominal iron — this database holds no head geometry — so the gap the arrow spans is the only measured thing in the frame. The dashed edge is the median of the 7-iron of 580 iron sets on record that publish one.

Offset through the set, against the field

Titleist's published offset at each club, over the middle half (p25–p75) of every comparable set on record that publishes one.

Titleist Forged 670 Ironsmiddle half of the field
0.050.10.150.223456789PWGW/AWSWLWOFFSET (IN)Titleist Forged 670 Irons — 2: 0.125 inTitleist Forged 670 Irons — 3: 0.12 inTitleist Forged 670 Irons — 4: 0.115 inTitleist Forged 670 Irons — 5: 0.11 inTitleist Forged 670 Irons — 6: 0.105 inTitleist Forged 670 Irons — 7: 0.1 inTitleist Forged 670 Irons — 8: 0.095 inTitleist Forged 670 Irons — 9: 0.09 inTitleist Forged 670 Irons — P: 0.085 in

A break in the line is a club the set does not publish an offset for — it is never bridged, because joining across a gap would draw an offset the manufacturer never stated. Every brand's name for the gap wedge is pooled into one rung, since only 25 of 917 sets publish two of them.

Specifications by option

What this record publishes. Across 9 options: loft, lie and length on every one.

9 rows, unsorted, collapsed — use the button below the table to show every option.

192 Iron590.125239.5
223 Iron600.12339
254 Iron610.115438.5
285 Iron620.11538
326 Iron62.50.105637.5
367 Iron630.17.537
408 Iron63.50.095836.5
449 Iron640.09836
48P640.085835.75

Head geometry doesn't change with the shaft, so it's stated once. A blank cell means Titleist did not publish that figure — we don't estimate.

Measured against comparable clubs

Where this club's published fitting specs sit among comparable clubs — never how good it is.

FigurePublishedAll ironsIts yearAmong its peers
Strongest-lofted 7-iron36°=905th of 953no release year on record=94th of 124 Titleist irons · =462nd of 508 low-handicap irons
Most offset at the 7-iron0.1"=395th of 583no release year on record=51st of 85 Titleist irons · =95th of 283 low-handicap irons
Widest loft range29°=629th of 1,104no release year on record=64th of 129 Titleist irons · =241st of 508 low-handicap irons
Most upright lie63°=33rd of 941no release year on record=1st of 124 Titleist irons · =8th of 505 low-handicap irons
Longest37"=265th of 894no release year on record=1st of 115 Titleist irons · =83rd of 466 low-handicap irons

player level — derived

This iron reads as built for a low-handicap player — our deterministic reading of 7-iron offset 0.1", 7-iron loft 36°. A design classification, not a rule about who may play it. How the bands are read →

Compare this iron →

Or go straight to a comparison: vs PXG 0211 XCOR2 Irons | Players Distance Irons · vs XXIO 13 Ladies Irons · vs TaylorMade 200 Steel Iron Set

More irons

Other Titleist irons on record. Nothing here is a ranking or a recommendation. Browse every club →

What's on this page

In progress2 of 3 built

2 of 3 parts of this club page are built, and we're filling in the rest.

  • Titleist's own specs, partly built.Taken from Titleist's product page. We haven't found their full spec sheet for this club yet, so some figures they publish may be missing.
  • Published options, built.9 configurations with 5 of the 7 specs an iron can publish.
  • Stock shaft, built.Titleist names no stock shaft for this club on the sources we hold, so there's nothing to link.

The site is in beta and the database is still being built, so expect gaps. Know something we don't? Help us fill it in — a link to where it's published is worth more than anything else you could send.

Know something about this club? 8 fields we don't hold — or tell us something here is wrong