TaylorMade iron
The TaylorMade Burner 2.0 HP Iron Set is an iron in 11 options from 19°–60°.
Built against the iron fieldpublished figures only
Image not published
Where this club lands
The field is every iron in the database that publishes both of the chart's figures — every brand, not just TaylorMade.
This set's 7-iron is 31° — 45th percentile, stronger-lofted than 55% of the 889 sets that publish one. The median is 32°.
Loft ladder against the field
Loft at each club in the set over the middle half (p25–p75) of every comparable iron set on record — the busiest rung here is built from 900.
TaylorMade Burner 2.0 HP Iron Setmiddle half of the field
A break in the line is a club the set does not publish a loft for — it is never bridged, because joining across a gap would draw a loft the manufacturer never stated. Every brand's name for the gap wedge is pooled into one rung, since only 25 of 917 sets publish two of them.
The head half
TaylorMade Burner 2.0 HP Iron Set · 7
- LOFT · X AXIS31°
- 45th percentile — stronger-lofted than 55% of the 889 sets that publish a 7-iron
- LIE · Y AXIS63°
- 97th percentile — more upright than 97% of the 889 sets that publish a 7-iron
7-iron field: Loft × Lie
The 7-iron of every comparable iron set on record publishing both loft and lie — 889 of them, binned by density.
Specifications by option
What this record publishes. Across 11 options: loft, lie, length and swingweight on every one.
11 rows, unsorted, collapsed — use the button below the table to show every option.
| 19 | 3 | 60.75 | 39.5 | D3.5 |
| 21 | 4 | 61.5 | 38.75 | D3.5 |
| 24 | 5 | 62 | 38.25 | D3.5 |
| 27 | 6 | 62.5 | 37.75 | D3.5 |
| 31 | 7 | 63 | 37 | D3.5 |
| 35 | 8 | 63.5 | 36.5 | D3.5 |
| 40 | 9 | 64 | 36 | D3.5 |
| 45 | PW | 64.5 | 35.5 | D3.5 |
| 50 | AW | 64.5 | 35.5 | D3.5 |
| 55 | SW | 64.5 | 35.25 | D5 |
| 60 | LW | 64.5 | 35 | D5 |
Head geometry doesn't change with the shaft, so it's stated once. A blank cell means TaylorMade did not publish that figure — we don't estimate.
Measured against comparable clubs
Where this club's published fitting specs sit among comparable clubs — never how good it is.
| Figure | Published | All irons | Its year | Among its peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strongest-lofted 7-iron | 31° | =332nd of 953 | no release year on record | =33rd of 86 TaylorMade irons · =125th of 237 mid-handicap irons |
| Widest loft range | 41° | =64th of 1,104 | no release year on record | =15th of 89 TaylorMade irons · =13th of 237 mid-handicap irons |
| Most upright lie | 63° | =33rd of 941 | no release year on record | =2nd of 83 TaylorMade irons · =7th of 233 mid-handicap irons |
| Longest | 37" | =265th of 894 | no release year on record | =17th of 85 TaylorMade irons · =74th of 227 mid-handicap irons |
player level — derived
This iron reads as built for a mid-handicap player — our deterministic reading of 7-iron loft 31° (no offset published). A design classification, not a rule about who may play it. How the bands are read →
Or go straight to a comparison: vs PXG 0211 XCOR2 Irons | Players Distance Irons · vs XXIO 13 Ladies Irons · vs Titleist 1979-80 Tour Model
More irons
TaylorMade 200 Steel Iron Set 18°–55° · 11 options TaylorMade 300 Iron Set 17°–48° · 10 options TaylorMade 320 Iron Set 18°–55° · 11 options TaylorMade 360 Iron Set 18°–60° · 12 options TaylorMade 360 XD Iron Set 18°–60° · 12 options TaylorMade AeroBurner Iron Set 19°–55° · 9 options TaylorMade Burner 2.0 Iron Set 19°–60° · 11 options TaylorMade Burner Iron Set 2009 · 19°–60° · 11 options
Other TaylorMade irons on record. Nothing here is a ranking or a recommendation. Browse every club →
What's on this page
In progress2 of 3 built
2 of 3 parts of this club page are built, and we're filling in the rest.
- TaylorMade's own specs, not built yet.We haven't found TaylorMade's own page for this club yet — everything here comes from the sources listed at the foot of the page.
- Published options, built.11 configurations with 4 of the 7 specs an iron can publish.
- Stock shaft, built.TaylorMade names no stock shaft for this club on the sources we hold, so there's nothing to link.
The site is in beta and the database is still being built, so expect gaps. Know something we don't? Help us fill it in — a link to where it's published is worth more than anything else you could send.