PXG fairway
The PXG Lightning Fairways is a fairway in 14 options from 15°–27°, offered with the Project X Denali Frost Blue, RH and LH.
Built against the fairway fieldpublished figures only
Where this club lands
Two separate readings, because a club is two products. Each field is every fairway in the database that publishes both of that chart's figures — every brand, not just PXG.
The head half
Head option
Across every option: this club's loft from the 31st to the 100th percentile, and length from the 9th to the 83rd percentile.
Head: Loft against Length
The cloud is every fairway head option on record that publishes both loft and length — 1,546 of them, binned by density.
The stock-shaft half
Across every build: this club's stock shafts run weight at the 45th percentile, and torque at the 69th percentile.
Stock shaft: Weight against Torque
The cloud is every fairway shaft variant on record that publishes both weight and torque — 1,748 of them, binned by density.
Specifications by option
What this record publishes. Across 14 options: loft, lie, length and head weight on every one.
14 rows, unsorted, collapsed — use the button below the table to show every option.
| 15 | Lightning 3 Wood | RH / LH | 58.5 | 43 | 215 |
| 17 | Lightning 4 Wood | RH / LH | 58.5 | 43 | 215 |
| 18 | Lightning 5 Wood | RH / LH | 59 | 42.5 | 220 |
| 21 | Lightning 7 Wood | RH / LH | 59.5 | 42 | 225 |
| 24 | Lightning 9 Wood | RH / LH | 60 | 41.5 | 230 |
| 27 | Lightning 11 Wood | RH / LH | 60.5 | 41 | 235 |
| 15 | Lightning Tour 3 Wood | RH / LH | 58 | 43 | 215 |
| 18 | Lightning Tour 5 Wood | RH / LH | 58.5 | 42.5 | 220 |
| 15 | 3 | RH / LH | 58.5 | 43 | 215 |
| 17 | 4 | RH / LH | 58.5 | 43 | 215 |
| 18 | 5 | RH / LH | 59 | 42.5 | 220 |
| 21 | 7 | RH / LH | 59.5 | 42 | 225 |
| 24 | 9 | RH / LH | 60 | 41.5 | 230 |
| 27 | 11 | RH / LH | 60.5 | 41 | 235 |
Head geometry doesn't change with the shaft, so it's stated once. A blank cell means PXG did not publish that figure — we don't estimate.
Stock shafts (1)
Every shaft PXG lists as stock for this club, each with its own flexes, weight and torque. Open one for its full loft × flex build table.
Project X Denali Frost Blue aftermarket 14 builds · 15°–27° · 1 flex · 60 g · 4.5°
- Weight
- 60 g
- Torque
- 4.5°
- Flexes
- Regular
14 rows, unsorted.
| 15 | 3 | Regular | RH / LH | 60 | 4.5 | 58.5 | 43 |
| 15 | Lightning 3 Wood | Regular | RH / LH | 60 | 4.5 | 58.5 | 43 |
| 15 | Lightning Tour 3 Wood | Regular | RH / LH | 60 | 4.5 | 58 | 43 |
| 17 | 4 | Regular | RH / LH | 60 | 4.5 | 58.5 | 43 |
| 17 | Lightning 4 Wood | Regular | RH / LH | 60 | 4.5 | 58.5 | 43 |
| 18 | 5 | Regular | RH / LH | 60 | 4.5 | 59 | 42.5 |
| 18 | Lightning 5 Wood | Regular | RH / LH | 60 | 4.5 | 59 | 42.5 |
| 18 | Lightning Tour 5 Wood | Regular | RH / LH | 60 | 4.5 | 58.5 | 42.5 |
| 21 | 7 | Regular | RH / LH | 60 | 4.5 | 59.5 | 42 |
| 21 | Lightning 7 Wood | Regular | RH / LH | 60 | 4.5 | 59.5 | 42 |
| 24 | 9 | Regular | RH / LH | 60 | 4.5 | 60 | 41.5 |
| 24 | Lightning 9 Wood | Regular | RH / LH | 60 | 4.5 | 60 | 41.5 |
| 27 | 11 | Regular | RH / LH | 60 | 4.5 | 60.5 | 41 |
| 27 | Lightning 11 Wood | Regular | RH / LH | 60 | 4.5 | 60.5 | 41 |
Made-for means a version built for this club, not the aftermarket shaft of the same name — a different product with different specs. We keep them as separate records and never blur the two.
Also stated on the record, verbatim — shafts we hold no matching record for, so they are quoted rather than linked:
- This harvest captures only the no-upcharge default stock shaft at the page's default Regular-flex selection (verified via the "Customize Shaft" configurator, which shows the selected default with no listed upcharge price while every alternative carries a $ upcharge).
- The Ladies/Senior/Stiff/X-Stiff stock-shaft SKUs and the full upcharge shaft catalog are out of scope for this stock-configuration harvest (same treatment as the Cleveland custom-shop carve-out).
Measured against comparable clubs
Where this club's published fitting specs sit among comparable clubs — never how good it is.
| Figure | Published | All fairway woods | 2025 | Among its peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lowest published loft | 15° | =182nd of 548 | =8th of 43 | =140th of 375 mid-handicap fairway woods |
| Widest loft range | 12° | =15th of 531 | =1st of 40 | =14th of 363 mid-handicap fairway woods |
| Most upright lie | 60.5° | =44th of 500 | =3rd of 41 | =28th of 339 mid-handicap fairway woods |
| Longest | 43" | =205th of 551 | =24th of 42 | =132nd of 381 mid-handicap fairway woods |
player level — derived
This fairway reads as built for a mid-handicap player — our deterministic reading of no tour or forgiveness designation in the manufacturer’s model name — core model. A design classification, not a rule about who may play it. How the bands are read →
Or go straight to a comparison: vs Callaway Apex Utility Woods · vs Cobra DS-ADAPT LS Fairway · vs Wilson DYNAPWR Carbon Fairway Wood
More fairways
PXG Wildcat Fairway 2025 · 19° · 2 options · 1 stock shaft PXG Black Ops Fairways 2024 · 15°–24° · 5 options · 1 stock shaft PXG 0311 GEN6 Fairway Wood 13°–21° · 4 options PXG 0311 XF GEN6 Fairway Wood 16°–22° · 4 options Ben Hogan PTx MAX Fairway Woods 2025 · 15°–21° · 3 options Callaway Apex Utility Woods 2025 · 17°–23° · 4 options · 1 stock shaft Cobra DS-ADAPT LS Fairway 2025 · 14.5°–17.5° · 3 options · 1 stock shaft Honma Malbon Performance FW (Ladies) 2025 · 16°–19° · 2 options
Other PXG fairways on record. Fairways released in 2025 by other brands, one per brand. Nothing here is a ranking or a recommendation. Browse every club →
What's on this page
In progress2 of 3 built
2 of 3 parts of this club page are built, and we're filling in the rest.
- PXG's own specs, partly built.Taken from PXG's product page. We haven't found their full spec sheet for this club yet, so some figures they publish may be missing.
- Published options, built.14 configurations with 4 of the 5 specs a fairway can publish.
- Stock shaft, built.1 stock shaft, each with its own specced page.
The site is in beta and the database is still being built, so expect gaps. Know something we don't? Help us fill it in — a link to where it's published is worth more than anything else you could send.