PXG iron
The PXG 0311 ST Iron Set is an iron in 9 options from 21°–52°, RH and LH.
Built against the iron fieldpublished figures only
Image not published
Where this club lands
The field is every iron in the database that publishes both of the chart's figures — every brand, not just PXG.
This set's 7-iron is 33° — 72nd percentile, weaker-lofted than 72% of the 889 sets that publish one. The median is 32°.
Loft ladder against the field
Loft at each club in the set over the middle half (p25–p75) of every comparable iron set on record — the busiest rung here is built from 900.
PXG 0311 ST Iron Setmiddle half of the field
A break in the line is a club the set does not publish a loft for — it is never bridged, because joining across a gap would draw a loft the manufacturer never stated. Every brand's name for the gap wedge is pooled into one rung, since only 25 of 917 sets publish two of them.
The head half
Read the set through
PXG 0311 ST Iron Set · 7
- LOFT · X AXIS33°
- 72nd percentile — weaker-lofted than 72% of the 889 sets that publish a 7-iron
- LIE · Y AXIS62.5°
- 77th percentile — more upright than 77% of the 889 sets that publish a 7-iron
7-iron field: Loft × Lie
The 7-iron of every comparable iron set on record publishing both loft and lie — 889 of them, binned by density.
Specifications by option
What this record publishes. Across 9 options: loft, lie and length on every one.
9 rows, unsorted, collapsed — use the button below the table to show every option.
| 21 | 3 | RH / LH | 60.5 | 39.5 |
| 23 | 4 | RH / LH | 61 | 38.875 |
| 26 | 5 | RH / LH | 61.5 | 38.25 |
| 29 | 6 | RH / LH | 62 | 37.625 |
| 33 | 7 | RH / LH | 62.5 | 37 |
| 37 | 8 | RH / LH | 63 | 36.5 |
| 42 | 9 | RH / LH | 63.5 | 35.75 |
| 47 | PW | RH / LH | 64 | 35.75 |
| 52 | GW | RH / LH | 64 | 35.5 |
Head geometry doesn't change with the shaft, so it's stated once. A blank cell means PXG did not publish that figure — we don't estimate.
Measured against comparable clubs
Where this club's published fitting specs sit among comparable clubs — never how good it is.
| Figure | Published | All irons | Its year | Among its peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strongest-lofted 7-iron | 33° | =568th of 953 | no release year on record | 14th of 14 PXG irons · =147th of 508 low-handicap irons |
| Widest loft range | 31° | =496th of 1,104 | no release year on record | =15th of 26 PXG irons · =162nd of 508 low-handicap irons |
| Most upright lie | 62.5° | =204th of 941 | no release year on record | =1st of 14 PXG irons · =88th of 505 low-handicap irons |
| Longest | 37" | =265th of 894 | no release year on record | =6th of 14 PXG irons · =83rd of 466 low-handicap irons |
player level — derived
This iron reads as built for a low-handicap player — our deterministic reading of 7-iron loft 33° (no offset published). A design classification, not a rule about who may play it. How the bands are read →
Or go straight to a comparison: vs XXIO 13 Ladies Irons · vs Titleist 1979-80 Tour Model · vs TaylorMade 200 Steel Iron Set
More irons
PXG 0211 Irons discontinued 2019 · 21.5°–60° · 10 options PXG 0211 XCOR2 Irons 2022 · 19°–60° · 10 options PXG 0211 XCOR2 Irons | Players Distance Irons 19°–60° · 10 options PXG 0211 Z Hybrid-Irons discontinued 2021 · 16°–55° · 9 options PXG 0311 Chrome Iron Set 19°–50° · 9 options PXG 0311 GEN8 Irons 2026 · 18°–60° · 27 options · 1 stock shaft PXG 0311 P GEN3 Iron Set 19°–50° · 9 options PXG 0311 T GEN3 Iron Set 20°–51° · 9 options
Other PXG irons on record. Nothing here is a ranking or a recommendation. Browse every club →
What's on this page
In progress2 of 3 built
2 of 3 parts of this club page are built, and we're filling in the rest.
- PXG's own specs, not built yet.We haven't found PXG's own page for this club yet — everything here comes from the sources listed at the foot of the page.
- Published options, built.9 configurations with 3 of the 7 specs an iron can publish.
- Stock shaft, built.PXG names no stock shaft for this club on the sources we hold, so there's nothing to link.
The site is in beta and the database is still being built, so expect gaps. Know something we don't? Help us fill it in — a link to where it's published is worth more than anything else you could send.