PING putter
Toe hang is the axis a putter is chosen on, and 205 of 835 putter records publish one — as words no two brands share, so it cannot be drawn.
Image not published
The field is every putter in the database that publishes both of the chart's figures — every brand, not just PING.
Across every option: this club's loft at the 66th percentile, and lie at the 3rd percentile.
The cloud is every putter head option on record that publishes both loft and lie — 1,369 of them, binned by density.
Pick an option above to see its published offset drawn to scale.
What this record publishes. Across 1 option: loft, lie and head weight on every one.
1 rows, unsorted.
| 3 | RH / LH | 20 | Full Shaft | 345 |
Head geometry doesn't change with the shaft, so it's stated once. A blank cell means PING did not publish that figure — we don't estimate.
PING does not publish this offset as a plain number — it is a description (a putter's "Full Shaft") or a value the source gave as a range. It is shown exactly as published and is never converted into one.
Where this club's published fitting specs sit among comparable clubs — never how good it is.
| Figure | Published | All putters | 2025 | Among its peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heaviest head | 345 g | =355th of 364 | =34th of 35 | =46th of 48 PING putters |
Or go straight to a comparison: vs Cobra 3D Printed Supernova CB Putter · vs Odyssey Ai-ONE Jailbird Nano · vs Bettinardi Antidote SB2 Long
Other PING putters on record. Putters released in 2025 by other brands, one per brand. Nothing here is a ranking or a recommendation. Browse every club →
2 of 3 parts of this club page are built, and we're filling in the rest.
The site is in beta and the database is still being built, so expect gaps. Know something we don't? Help us fill it in — a link to where it's published is worth more than anything else you could send.