PING wedge
The PING s259 Hydropearl Chrome Wedges is a wedge in 25 options from 46°–62°.
Image not published
PING wedge
Image not published
What this record publishes. Across 25 options: loft and length on every one.
25 rows, unsorted, collapsed — use the button below the table to show every option.
| 46 | 46° S | 0.02 | 12 | 35.5 |
| 48 | 48° S | 0.02 | 12 | 35.5 |
| 50 | 50° S | 0.02 | 12 | 35.5 |
| 52 | 52° S | 0.02 | 12 | 35.5 |
| 54 | 54° S | 0.02 | 12 | 35.25 |
| 56 | 56° S | 0.02 | 12 | 35.25 |
| 58 | 58° S | 0.02 | 10 | 35 |
| 60 | 60° S | 0.02 | 10 | 35 |
| 50 | 50° W | 0.02 | 14 | 35.5 |
| 52 | 52° W | 0.02 | 14 | 35.5 |
| 54 | 54° W | 0.02 | 14 | 35.25 |
| 56 | 56° W | 0.02 | 14 | 35.25 |
| 58 | 58° W | 0.02 | 14 | 35 |
| 60 | 60° W | 0.02 | 14 | 35 |
| 58 | 58° B | 0.02 | 8 | 35 |
| 60 | 60° B | 0.02 | 8 | 35 |
| 54 | 54° H | 0.02 | 10 | 35.25 |
| 56 | 56° H | 0.02 | 10 | 35.25 |
| 58 | 58° H | 0.02 | 8 | 35 |
| 60 | 60° H | 0.02 | 8 | 35 |
| 58 | 58° T | 0.02 | 6 | 35 |
| 60 | 60° T | 0.02 | 6 | 35 |
| 62 | 62° T | 0.02 | 6 | 35 |
| 58 | 58° E2 | 0.02 | 8 | 35 |
| 60 | 60° E2 | 0.02 | 8 | 35 |
Head geometry doesn't change with the shaft, so it's stated once. A blank cell means PING did not publish that figure — we don't estimate.
Where this club's published fitting specs sit among comparable clubs — never how good it is.
| Figure | Published | All wedges | Its year | Among its peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Widest loft range | 16° | =42nd of 394 | no release year on record | =1st of 14 PING wedges |
| Most bounce | 14° | =31st of 278 | no release year on record | |
| Longest | 35.5" | =175th of 407 | no release year on record | =1st of 20 PING wedges |
Or go straight to a comparison: vs PXG 0211 DC Wedge · vs XXIO 14 Wedges · vs Tour Edge 1outpluswedge
Other PING wedges on record. Nothing here is a ranking or a recommendation. Browse every club →
2 of 3 parts of this club page are built, and we're filling in the rest.
The site is in beta and the database is still being built, so expect gaps. Know something we don't? Help us fill it in — a link to where it's published is worth more than anything else you could send.