Mizuno fairway
The Mizuno ST 180 Fairway Wood is a fairway in 2 options from 15°–18°, RH.
Image not published
Mizuno fairway
Image not published
The field is every fairway in the database that publishes both of the chart's figures — every brand, not just Mizuno.
Across every option: this club's loft from the 31st to the 61st percentile, and length from the 42nd to the 61st percentile.
The cloud is every fairway head option on record that publishes both loft and length — 1,546 of them, binned by density.
What this record publishes. Across 2 options: loft and length on every one.
2 rows, unsorted.
| 15 | 3 (15°) | 42.75 |
| 18 | 5 (18°) | 42.25 |
Head geometry doesn't change with the shaft, so it's stated once. A blank cell means Mizuno did not publish that figure — we don't estimate.
Where this club's published fitting specs sit among comparable clubs — never how good it is.
| Figure | Published | All fairway woods | Its year | Among its peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lowest published loft | 15° | =182nd of 548 | no release year on record | =4th of 17 Mizuno fairway woods · =140th of 375 mid-handicap fairway woods |
| Widest loft range | 3° | =470th of 531 | no release year on record | =9th of 17 Mizuno fairway woods · =318th of 363 mid-handicap fairway woods |
| Longest | 42.8" | =425th of 551 | no release year on record | =14th of 17 Mizuno fairway woods · =298th of 381 mid-handicap fairway woods |
This fairway reads as built for a mid-handicap player — our deterministic reading of no tour or forgiveness designation in the manufacturer’s model name — core model. A design classification, not a rule about who may play it. How the bands are read →
Or go straight to a comparison: vs PXG 0311 GEN6 Fairway Wood · vs XXIO 13 Womens Fairway Wood · vs Tour Edge 13° Ex9 LONG 3 FAIRWAY WOOD
Other Mizuno fairways on record. Nothing here is a ranking or a recommendation. Browse every club →
2 of 3 parts of this club page are built, and we're filling in the rest.
The site is in beta and the database is still being built, so expect gaps. Know something we don't? Help us fill it in — a link to where it's published is worth more than anything else you could send.