Skip to content
Zomma Golf
Menu

Mizuno iron

The Mizuno JPX923 Tour iron is an iron in 8 options from 24°–51°, RH.

Discontinued. Kept here because the published specs still matter to anyone playing one or buying used.

8
options
24–51
loft °
2023
released
Built against the iron fieldpublished figures only
DIFFERENCE FROM THE MEDIAN OF EVERY RECORD WE HOLDLOFTMEDIAN 33.0°36.0° +3LIEMEDIAN 62.5°61.8° -0.8LENGTHMEDIAN 37.00"36.75" -0.25OFFSETMEDIAN 0.115"0.116" +0.001
Each bar is this club's published figure minus the median of the 1,084 other irons on record that publish it — a median over the records we hold.

View on Mizuno →

Where this club lands

The field is every iron in the database that publishes both of the chart's figures — every brand, not just Mizuno.

This set's 7-iron is 34° — 86th percentile, weaker-lofted than 86% of the 889 sets that publish one. The median is 32°.

Loft ladder against the field

Loft at each club in the set over the middle half (p25–p75) of every comparable iron set on record — the busiest rung here is built from 900.

Mizuno JPX923 Tourmiddle half of the field
2030405060123456789PWGW/AWSWLWLOFT (°)Mizuno JPX923 Tour — 4: 24°Mizuno JPX923 Tour — 5: 27°Mizuno JPX923 Tour — 6: 30°Mizuno JPX923 Tour — 7: 34°Mizuno JPX923 Tour — 8: 38°Mizuno JPX923 Tour — 9: 42°Mizuno JPX923 Tour — PW: 46°Mizuno JPX923 Tour — GW: 51°

A break in the line is a club the set does not publish a loft for — it is never bridged, because joining across a gap would draw a loft the manufacturer never stated. Every brand's name for the gap wedge is pooled into one rung, since only 25 of 917 sets publish two of them.

The head half

Read the set through

Mizuno JPX923 Tour · 7-iron

LOFT · X AXIS34°
86th percentile — weaker-lofted than 86% of the 889 sets that publish a 7-iron
LIE · Y AXIS61.5°
11th percentile — flatter than 89% of the 889 sets that publish a 7-iron
7-iron field: Loft × Lie

The 7-iron of every comparable iron set on record publishing both loft and lie — 889 of them, binned by density.

Offset

Published offset of 0.118 in: the leading edge sits 0.118 in behind the line of the shaft, against a median of 0.12 in for the 7-iron of 580 iron sets on record that publish one.MEDIAN 0.12 inOFFSET 0.118 inSHAFTLEADING EDGE0.25 INLEADING EDGE BEHIND THE SHAFTNOMINAL OUTLINE · SEEN FROM THE TOE · TRUE SCALE

Mizuno JPX923 Tour · 7-iron — the leading edge sits behind the line of the shaft by the published figure, drawn to the scale marked and seen from the toe, which is the one view that shows offset truly: it runs perpendicular to the face, so a picture square to the face would have it pointing at you. The outline is a nominal iron — this database holds no head geometry — so the gap the arrow spans is the only measured thing in the frame. The dashed edge is the median of the 7-iron of 580 iron sets on record that publish one.

Offset through the set, against the field

Mizuno's published offset at each club, over the middle half (p25–p75) of every comparable set on record that publishes one.

Mizuno JPX923 Tourmiddle half of the field
0.050.10.150.223456789PWGW/AWSWLWOFFSET (IN)Mizuno JPX923 Tour — 4: 0.131 inMizuno JPX923 Tour — 5: 0.127 inMizuno JPX923 Tour — 6: 0.122 inMizuno JPX923 Tour — 7: 0.118 inMizuno JPX923 Tour — 8: 0.114 inMizuno JPX923 Tour — 9: 0.11 inMizuno JPX923 Tour — PW: 0.106 inMizuno JPX923 Tour — GW: 0.102 in

A break in the line is a club the set does not publish an offset for — it is never bridged, because joining across a gap would draw an offset the manufacturer never stated. Every brand's name for the gap wedge is pooled into one rung, since only 25 of 917 sets publish two of them.

Specifications by option

What this record publishes. Across 8 options: loft, lie, length and swingweight on every one.

8 rows, unsorted.

244-iron600.13138.5D2
275-iron60.50.12738D2
306-iron610.12237.5D2
347-iron61.50.11837D2
388-iron620.11436.5D2
429-iron62.50.1136D2
46PW630.10635.5D2
51GW630.10235.25D2

Head geometry doesn't change with the shaft, so it's stated once. A blank cell means Mizuno did not publish that figure — we don't estimate.

Measured against comparable clubs

Where this club's published fitting specs sit among comparable clubs — never how good it is.

FigurePublishedAll irons2023Among its peers
Strongest-lofted 7-iron34°=677th of 953=32nd of 35=43rd of 69 Mizuno irons · =246th of 508 low-handicap irons
Most offset at the 7-iron0.118"=294th of 583=15th of 2334th of 48 Mizuno irons · 19th of 283 low-handicap irons
Widest loft range27°=771st of 1,104=29th of 42=33rd of 71 Mizuno irons · =323rd of 508 low-handicap irons
Most upright lie61.5°=835th of 941=30th of 34=17th of 69 Mizuno irons · =439th of 505 low-handicap irons
Longest37"=265th of 894=12th of 34=21st of 69 Mizuno irons · =83rd of 466 low-handicap irons

player level — derived

This iron reads as built for a low-handicap player — our deterministic reading of 7-iron offset 0.118", 7-iron loft 34° (traditional players loft). A design classification, not a rule about who may play it. How the bands are read →

Compare this iron →

Or go straight to a comparison: vs Cobra Aerojet Iron Set · vs Callaway Big Bertha · vs Miura CB-302

More irons

Other Mizuno irons on record. Irons released in 2023 by other brands, one per brand. Nothing here is a ranking or a recommendation. Browse every club →

What's on this page

In progress2 of 3 built

2 of 3 parts of this club page are built, and we're filling in the rest.

  • Mizuno's own specs, partly built.Taken from Mizuno's product page. We haven't found their full spec sheet for this club yet, so some figures they publish may be missing.
  • Published options, built.8 configurations with 5 of the 7 specs an iron can publish.
  • Stock shaft, built.Mizuno names no stock shaft for this club on the sources we hold, so there's nothing to link.

The site is in beta and the database is still being built, so expect gaps. Know something we don't? Help us fill it in — a link to where it's published is worth more than anything else you could send.

Know something about this club? 5 fields we don't hold — or tell us something here is wrong