Skip to content
Zomma Golf
Menu

Miura iron

The Miura CB-501 Iron Set is an iron in 8 options from 21°–47°.

8
options
21–47
loft °
Built against the iron fieldpublished figures only
DIFFERENCE FROM THE MEDIAN OF EVERY RECORD WE HOLDLOFTMEDIAN 33.0°32.0° -1LIEMEDIAN 62.5°60.8° -1.8OFFSETMEDIAN 0.115"0.106" -0.009
Each bar is this club's published figure minus the median of the 1,118 other irons on record that publish it — a median over the records we hold.

Image not published

Where this club lands

The field is every iron in the database that publishes both of the chart's figures — every brand, not just Miura.

This set's 7-iron is 34° — 86th percentile, weaker-lofted than 86% of the 889 sets that publish one. The median is 32°.

Loft ladder against the field

Loft at each club in the set over the middle half (p25–p75) of every comparable iron set on record — the busiest rung here is built from 900.

Miura CB-501 Iron Setmiddle half of the field
2030405060123456789PWGW/AWSWLWLOFT (°)Miura CB-501 Iron Set — 3: 21°Miura CB-501 Iron Set — 4: 24°Miura CB-501 Iron Set — 5: 27°Miura CB-501 Iron Set — 6: 30°Miura CB-501 Iron Set — 7: 34°Miura CB-501 Iron Set — 8: 38°Miura CB-501 Iron Set — 9: 42°Miura CB-501 Iron Set — PW: 47°

A break in the line is a club the set does not publish a loft for — it is never bridged, because joining across a gap would draw a loft the manufacturer never stated. Every brand's name for the gap wedge is pooled into one rung, since only 25 of 917 sets publish two of them.

The head half

Read the set through

Miura CB-501 Iron Set · #7

LOFT · X AXIS34°
86th percentile — weaker-lofted than 86% of the 889 sets that publish a 7-iron
LIE · Y AXIS61°
1st percentile — flatter than 99% of the 889 sets that publish a 7-iron
7-iron field: Loft × Lie

The 7-iron of every comparable iron set on record publishing both loft and lie — 889 of them, binned by density.

Offset

Published offset of 0.106 in (published as 2.7 mm): the leading edge sits 0.106 in behind the line of the shaft, against a median of 0.12 in for the 7-iron of 580 iron sets on record that publish one.MEDIAN 0.12 inOFFSET 0.106 in · 2.7 mm as publishedSHAFTLEADING EDGE0.25 INLEADING EDGE BEHIND THE SHAFTNOMINAL OUTLINE · SEEN FROM THE TOE · TRUE SCALE

Miura CB-501 Iron Set · #7 — the leading edge sits behind the line of the shaft by the published figure, drawn to the scale marked and seen from the toe, which is the one view that shows offset truly: it runs perpendicular to the face, so a picture square to the face would have it pointing at you. The outline is a nominal iron — this database holds no head geometry — so the gap the arrow spans is the only measured thing in the frame. The dashed edge is the median of the 7-iron of 580 iron sets on record that publish one.

Offset through the set, against the field

Miura's published offset at each club, over the middle half (p25–p75) of every comparable set on record that publishes one.

Miura CB-501 Iron Setmiddle half of the field
0.050.10.150.223456789PWGW/AWSWLWOFFSET (IN)Miura CB-501 Iron Set — 3: 0.126 inMiura CB-501 Iron Set — 4: 0.126 inMiura CB-501 Iron Set — 5: 0.126 inMiura CB-501 Iron Set — 6: 0.106 inMiura CB-501 Iron Set — 7: 0.106 inMiura CB-501 Iron Set — 8: 0.106 inMiura CB-501 Iron Set — 9: 0.087 inMiura CB-501 Iron Set — PW: 0.047 in

A break in the line is a club the set does not publish an offset for — it is never bridged, because joining across a gap would draw an offset the manufacturer never stated. Every brand's name for the gap wedge is pooled into one rung, since only 25 of 917 sets publish two of them.

Specifications by option

What this record publishes. Across 8 options: loft and lie on every one.

8 rows, unsorted.

21#3590.1262
24#459.50.1264
27#5600.1265
30#660.50.1066
34#7610.1067
38#861.50.1068
42#9620.0878
47PW62.50.04710

Head geometry doesn't change with the shaft, so it's stated once. A blank cell means Miura did not publish that figure — we don't estimate.

Miura publishes offset in millimetres; the offset (in) column is that figure converted, and the record keeps Miura's own figure verbatim.

Measured against comparable clubs

Where this club's published fitting specs sit among comparable clubs — never how good it is.

FigurePublishedAll ironsIts yearAmong its peers
Strongest-lofted 7-iron34°=677th of 953no release year on record=21st of 34 Miura irons · =246th of 508 low-handicap irons
Most offset at the 7-iron0.106"=370th of 583no release year on record=70th of 283 low-handicap irons
Widest loft range26°=813th of 1,104no release year on record=11th of 35 Miura irons · =339th of 508 low-handicap irons
Most upright lie61°=924th of 941no release year on record=30th of 34 Miura irons · =492nd of 505 low-handicap irons

player level — derived

This iron reads as built for a low-handicap player — our deterministic reading of 7-iron offset 0.106", 7-iron loft 34°. A design classification, not a rule about who may play it. How the bands are read →

Compare this iron →

Or go straight to a comparison: vs PXG 0211 XCOR2 Irons | Players Distance Irons · vs XXIO 13 Ladies Irons · vs Titleist 1979-80 Tour Model

More irons

Other Miura irons on record. Nothing here is a ranking or a recommendation. Browse every club →

What's on this page

In progress2 of 3 built

2 of 3 parts of this club page are built, and we're filling in the rest.

  • Miura's own specs, not built yet.We haven't found Miura's own page for this club yet — everything here comes from the sources listed at the foot of the page.
  • Published options, built.8 configurations with 4 of the 7 specs an iron can publish.
  • Stock shaft, built.Miura names no stock shaft for this club on the sources we hold, so there's nothing to link.

The site is in beta and the database is still being built, so expect gaps. Know something we don't? Help us fill it in — a link to where it's published is worth more than anything else you could send.

Know something about this club? 10 fields we don't hold — or tell us something here is wrong