Cleveland putter
Discontinued. Kept here because the published specs still matter to anyone playing one or buying used.
Toe hang is the axis a putter is chosen on, and 205 of 835 putter records publish one — as words no two brands share, so it cannot be drawn.
Image not published
The field is every putter in the database that publishes both of the chart's figures — every brand, not just Cleveland.
Across every option: this club's loft at the 66th percentile, and lie at the 81st percentile.
The cloud is every putter head option on record that publishes both loft and lie — 1,369 of them, binned by density.
What this record publishes. Across 3 options: loft, lie, length and head weight on every one.
3 rows, unsorted.
| 3 | 33 in | RH / LH | 70 | 33 | 350 |
| 3 | 34 in | RH / LH | 70 | 34 | 350 |
| 3 | 35 in | RH / LH | 70 | 35 | 350 |
Head geometry doesn't change with the shaft, so it's stated once. A blank cell means Cleveland did not publish that figure — we don't estimate.
Where this club's published fitting specs sit among comparable clubs — never how good it is.
| Figure | Published | All putters | 2020 | Among its peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Most upright lie | 70° | =124th of 552 | =1st of 12 | =4th of 68 Cleveland putters |
| Longest | 35" | =62nd of 370 | =1st of 12 | =10th of 65 Cleveland putters |
| Heaviest head | 350 g | =319th of 364 | too few comparable clubs to place | =52nd of 54 Cleveland putters |
Or go straight to a comparison: vs Ben Hogan BHB01 Putter · vs PING CA 70 Putter · vs L.A.B. Golf DF 2.1
Other Cleveland putters on record. Putters released in 2020 by other brands, one per brand. Nothing here is a ranking or a recommendation. Browse every club →
2 of 3 parts of this club page are built, and we're filling in the rest.
The site is in beta and the database is still being built, so expect gaps. Know something we don't? Help us fill it in — a link to where it's published is worth more than anything else you could send.