Callaway hybrid
The Callaway Mavrik hybrid is a hybrid in 7 options from 18°–26°, RH and LH.
Discontinued. Kept here because the published specs still matter to anyone playing one or buying used.
Built against the hybrid fieldpublished figures only
Where this club lands
The field is every hybrid in the database that publishes both of the chart's figures — every brand, not just Callaway.
The head half
Head option
Across every option: this club's loft from the 15th to the 57th percentile, and length from the 50th to the 86th percentile.
Head: Loft against Length
The cloud is every hybrid head option on record that publishes both loft and length — 1,051 of them, binned by density.
Specifications by option
What this record publishes. Across 7 options: loft on every one; lie on 6 of 7, length on 6 of 7 and swingweight on 6 of 7.
7 rows, unsorted.
| 18 | 3H | RH / LH | 58 | 40.5 | D2 |
| 20 | 4H | RH / LH | 58.5 | 40 | D2 |
| 23 | 5H | RH / LH | 59 | 39.5 | D2 |
| 26 | 6H | RH / LH | not published | not published | not published |
| 18 | 3 | RH / LH | 58 | 40.5 | D2 |
| 20 | 4 | RH / LH | 58.5 | 40 | D2 |
| 23 | 5 | RH / LH | 59 | 39.5 | D2 |
Head geometry doesn't change with the shaft, so it's stated once. A blank cell means Callaway did not publish that figure — we don't estimate.
Stock shafts
Callaway states this about the shaft this club ships with, quoted exactly as the record holds it:
- Standard 2020 Mavrik hybrid (stock shaft UST Helium per press coverage, not linked here as no matching data/shafts/callaway record exists).
We hold no shaft record matching that name, so there is nothing to link to and no weight, torque or flex profile to show — naming one on a guess would attach another product's numbers to this club. Browse every shaft instead.
Measured against comparable clubs
Where this club's published fitting specs sit among comparable clubs — never how good it is.
| Figure | Published | All hybrids | 2020 | Among its peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lowest published loft | 18° | =166th of 456 | =5th of 12 | =11th of 76 Callaway hybrids · =137th of 346 mid-handicap hybrids |
| Widest loft range | 8° | =247th of 448 | =6th of 12 | =49th of 76 Callaway hybrids · =179th of 339 mid-handicap hybrids |
| Most upright lie | 59° | =359th of 428 | too few comparable clubs to place | =57th of 74 Callaway hybrids · =271st of 325 mid-handicap hybrids |
| Longest | 40.5" | =188th of 446 | too few comparable clubs to place | =25th of 74 Callaway hybrids · =156th of 338 mid-handicap hybrids |
player level — derived
This hybrid reads as built for a mid-handicap player — our deterministic reading of no tour or forgiveness designation in the manufacturer’s model name — core model. A design classification, not a rule about who may play it. How the bands are read →
Or go straight to a comparison: vs Mizuno CLK Hybrid · vs Cobra KING SpeedZone Hybrid · vs Ben Hogan UiHi
More hybrids
Callaway Big Bertha B21 Hybrids 2020 · 19°–33° · 9 options Callaway Mavrik Max Hybrid 2020 · 19°–33° · 6 options Callaway Mavrik Pro Hybrid 2020 · 18°–23° · 3 options Callaway EPIC Super Hybrid 2021 · 16°–27° · 5 options Ben Hogan UiHi 2020 · 18°–26° · 3 options Cobra KING SpeedZone Hybrid 2020 · 17°–24° · 4 options Honma T//World TR21 H Hybrid discontinued 2020 · 18°–24° · 3 options Mizuno CLK Hybrid 2020 · 16°–25° · 4 options
Other Callaway hybrids on record. Hybrids released in 2020 by other brands, one per brand. Nothing here is a ranking or a recommendation. Browse every club →
What's on this page
In progress2 of 3 built
2 of 3 parts of this club page are built, and we're filling in the rest.
- Callaway's own specs, partly built.Taken from Callaway's product page. We haven't found their full spec sheet for this club yet, so some figures they publish may be missing.
- Published options, built.7 configurations with 4 of the 6 specs a hybrid can publish.
- Stock shaft, built.Callaway names no stock shaft for this club on the sources we hold, so there's nothing to link.
The site is in beta and the database is still being built, so expect gaps. Know something we don't? Help us fill it in — a link to where it's published is worth more than anything else you could send.