Callaway fairway
Specifications by option
What this record publishes. Across 4 options: loft and lie on every one.
4 rows, unsorted.
| 15 | 3W (Adjustable) | RH / LH | 58 |
| 16.5 | 3HL (Adjustable) | RH | 58 |
| 18 | 5W (Adjustable) | RH / LH | 58.5 |
| 21.5 | 7W | RH | 59 |
Head geometry doesn't change with the shaft, so it's stated once. A blank cell means Callaway did not publish that figure — we don't estimate.
Measured against comparable clubs
Where this club's published fitting specs sit among comparable clubs — never how good it is.
| Figure | Published | All fairway woods | Its year | Among its peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lowest published loft | 15° | =182nd of 548 | no release year on record | =30th of 91 Callaway fairway woods · =12th of 126 high-handicap fairway woods |
| Widest loft range | 6.5° | =249th of 531 | no release year on record | =47th of 90 Callaway fairway woods · =83rd of 126 high-handicap fairway woods |
| Most upright lie | 59° | =208th of 500 | no release year on record | =19th of 89 Callaway fairway woods · =77th of 117 high-handicap fairway woods |
player level — derived
This fairway reads as built for a high-handicap player — our deterministic reading of manufacturer designation "max d" (forgiveness / draw / lightweight line). A design classification, not a rule about who may play it. How the bands are read →
Or go straight to a comparison: vs PXG 0311 GEN6 Fairway Wood · vs XXIO 13 Womens Fairway Wood · vs Tour Edge 13° Ex9 LONG 3 FAIRWAY WOOD
More fairways
Other Callaway fairways on record. Nothing here is a ranking or a recommendation. Browse every club →
What's on this page
2 of 3 parts of this club page are built, and we're filling in the rest.
- Callaway's own specs, partly built.Taken from Callaway's product page. We haven't found their full spec sheet for this club yet, so some figures they publish may be missing.
- Published options, built.4 configurations with 2 of the 5 specs a fairway can publish.
- Stock shaft, built.Callaway names no stock shaft for this club on the sources we hold, so there's nothing to link.
The site is in beta and the database is still being built, so expect gaps. Know something we don't? Help us fill it in — a link to where it's published is worth more than anything else you could send.