Bridgestone iron
Discontinued. Kept here because the published specs still matter to anyone playing one or buying used.
The field is every iron in the database that publishes both of the chart's figures — every brand, not just Bridgestone.
This set's 7-iron is 31° — 45th percentile, stronger-lofted than 55% of the 889 sets that publish one. The median is 32°.
Loft at each club in the set over the middle half (p25–p75) of every comparable iron set on record — the busiest rung here is built from 900.
A break in the line is a club the set does not publish a loft for — it is never bridged, because joining across a gap would draw a loft the manufacturer never stated. Every brand's name for the gap wedge is pooled into one rung, since only 25 of 917 sets publish two of them.
Bridgestone TOUR B JGR HF2 Irons · 7-iron
The 7-iron of every comparable iron set on record publishing both loft and lie — 889 of them, binned by density.
Bridgestone TOUR B JGR HF2 Irons · 7-iron — the leading edge sits behind the line of the shaft by the published figure, drawn to the scale marked and seen from the toe, which is the one view that shows offset truly: it runs perpendicular to the face, so a picture square to the face would have it pointing at you. The outline is a nominal iron — this database holds no head geometry — so the gap the arrow spans is the only measured thing in the frame. The dashed edge is the median of the 7-iron of 580 iron sets on record that publish one.
Bridgestone's published offset at each club, over the middle half (p25–p75) of every comparable set on record that publishes one.
A break in the line is a club the set does not publish an offset for — it is never bridged, because joining across a gap would draw an offset the manufacturer never stated. Every brand's name for the gap wedge is pooled into one rung, since only 25 of 917 sets publish two of them.
What this record publishes. Across 8 options: loft, lie, length and swingweight on every one.
8 rows, unsorted.
| 22 | 4-iron | RH | 60.5 | 0.177 | 38.75 | D2 | 0.177 | 4.5 |
| 24 | 5-iron | RH / LH | 61 | 0.157 | 38.25 | D2 | 0.157 | 4 |
| 27 | 6-iron | RH / LH | 61.5 | 0.157 | 37.75 | D2 | 0.157 | 4 |
| 31 | 7-iron | RH / LH | 62 | 0.157 | 37.25 | D2 | 0.157 | 4 |
| 35 | 8-iron | RH / LH | 62.5 | 0.138 | 36.75 | D2 | 0.138 | 3.5 |
| 39 | 9-iron | RH / LH | 63 | 0.138 | 36.25 | D2 | 0.138 | 3.5 |
| 44 | PW | RH / LH | 63.5 | 0.138 | 35.75 | D2 | 0.138 | 3.5 |
| 50 | AW | RH / LH | 63.5 | 0.118 | 35.5 | D3 | 0.118 | 3 |
Head geometry doesn't change with the shaft, so it's stated once. A blank cell means Bridgestone did not publish that figure — we don't estimate.
Bridgestone publishes offset in millimetres; the offset (in) column is that figure converted, and Bridgestone's own is in the column beside it.
Bridgestone publishes offset in millimetres. The (in) column is that figure converted at 25.4 mm to the inch, and Bridgestone's own millimetre column sits beside it — neither is dropped, so the published figure is always on the page.
Where this club's published fitting specs sit among comparable clubs — never how good it is.
| Figure | Published | All irons | 2018 | Among its peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strongest-lofted 7-iron | 31° | =332nd of 953 | =5th of 16 | =175th of 208 high-handicap irons |
| Most offset at the 7-iron | 0.157" | =132nd of 583 | 5th of 13 | =108th of 155 high-handicap irons |
| Widest loft range | 28° | =719th of 1,104 | =6th of 16 | =178th of 208 high-handicap irons |
| Most upright lie | 62° | =539th of 941 | =5th of 16 | =119th of 203 high-handicap irons |
| Longest | 37.3" | =49th of 894 | =2nd of 16 | =24th of 201 high-handicap irons |
This iron reads as built for a high-handicap player — our deterministic reading of 7-iron offset 0.157", 7-iron loft 31°. A design classification, not a rule about who may play it. How the bands are read →
Or go straight to a comparison: vs Cobra F-Max Superlite Iron Set · vs TaylorMade M3 Iron Set · vs Callaway Rogue Pro Iron Set
Other Bridgestone irons on record. Irons released in 2018 by other brands, one per brand. Nothing here is a ranking or a recommendation. Browse every club →
2 of 3 parts of this club page are built, and we're filling in the rest.
The site is in beta and the database is still being built, so expect gaps. Know something we don't? Help us fill it in — a link to where it's published is worth more than anything else you could send.