Ben Hogan putter
Toe hang is the axis a putter is chosen on, and 205 of 835 putter records publish one — as words no two brands share, so it cannot be drawn.
The field is every putter in the database that publishes both of the chart's figures — every brand, not just Ben Hogan.
Across every option: this club's loft at the 2nd percentile, and lie at the 81st percentile.
The cloud is every putter head option on record that publishes both loft and lie — 1,369 of them, binned by density.
Pick an option above to see its published offset drawn to scale.
What this record publishes. Across 1 option: loft, lie, length and head weight on every one.
1 rows, unsorted.
| 2 | BHB01 | 70 | 0.37 | 35 | 355 | 43° Toe Hang | 1020C carbon steel, forged | CNC milled |
Head geometry doesn't change with the shaft, so it's stated once. A blank cell means Ben Hogan did not publish that figure — we don't estimate.
Where this club's published fitting specs sit among comparable clubs — never how good it is.
| Figure | Published | All putters | 2019 | Among its peers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Most upright lie | 70° | =124th of 552 | too few comparable clubs to place | =1st of 12 Ben Hogan putters |
| Longest | 35" | =62nd of 370 | too few comparable clubs to place | |
| Heaviest head | 355 g | =277th of 364 | too few comparable clubs to place | =3rd of 12 Ben Hogan putters |
Or go straight to a comparison: vs L.A.B. Golf DF 2.1 · vs Bettinardi Studio Stock 2 · vs PING CA 70 Putter
Other Ben Hogan putters on record. Putters released in 2019 by other brands, one per brand. Nothing here is a ranking or a recommendation. Browse every club →
2 of 3 parts of this club page are built, and we're filling in the rest.
The site is in beta and the database is still being built, so expect gaps. Know something we don't? Help us fill it in — a link to where it's published is worth more than anything else you could send.